Today - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Today

Description:

Q varies from 10 at Redoubt to 1000 at Kusatsu-Shirane and Galeras ... Deep LP events at Mount Rainier. Comparing a Long Period with a High Frequency Event ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:112
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: gregor2
Category:
Tags: mount | redoubt | today

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Today


1
Volcano Seismology - 16 March 2009
  • Today
  • Long-period earthquakes and complex frequencies
  • Estimate fluid type from frequency-attenuation
    relationship of LP coda
  • The Sompi method
  • Deep Long period earthquakes
  • Examples and case studies
  • Midterm exam on Wednesday 18 March

2
Sompi method
  • LP earthquakes typically characterized by
    dominant frequency and decaying amplitudes
  • The frequency and decay characteristics can be
    used to determine the type of fluid involved in
    the source

From Kumagai and Chouet, GJI, 1999
3
Sompi method
  • Sompi is from a Japanese word meaning
    existence?
  • An application of an Autoregressive model
  • AR typically used for prediction
  • In this case, used for extracting complex
    frequencies
  • Frequency and growth rate
  • Complex frequency f-ig
  • f - frequency
  • i - sqrt(-1)
  • g - growth rate
  • Dimensionless measure of the increase in
    amplitude
  • Negative values indicate decay
  • So Sompi is used to extract the decay
    characteristics and dominant frequencies together

4
How does the Sompi method work?
  • Think of a simple regression technique, like
    least squares

5
How does the Sompi method work?
  • Think of a simple regression technique, like
    least squares
  • You can fit the data with polynomials of
    different degrees (orders)
  • Loop over many orders (from 20-60) and find
    parameters f and g for each
  • Where many points are nearly the same (same f and
    g for different polynomial orders), the signal is
    stable for many different orders and there is
    some confidence that the parameters are
    significant

6
Sompi method
  • Attenuation quality factor, Q, estimated from
    complex frequency
  • Large Q (small Q-1)- little attenuation
  • Q-1 Qi-1 Qr-1
  • Intrinsic Qi-1
  • Energy lost through internal friction
  • Conversion of seismic energy to heat
  • Qr-1 from radiative losses
  • Resonance
  • Scattering
  • Sompi method addresses only Qr-1
  • Intrinsic Qi-1 also affected by crack and fluid
    properties, but may be less important
  • The quality factor can be expressed in terms of
    the complex frequency
  • Q-1 -2g/f

7
Sompi method
  • Sompi method estimates f and g for different AR
    orders
  • Similar complex frequencies found for many orders
    indicate best estimates

From Kumagai and Chouet, GJI, 1999
8
Sompi method
  • Only the coda is used, not the inhomogeneous part
    at the beginning of he seismogram

From Kumagai and Chouet, GJI, 1999
9
Sompi method
  • Q varies from 10 at Redoubt to 1000 at
    Kusatsu-Shirane and Galeras

From Kumagai and Chouet, GJI, 1999
10
Sompi method
  • Q varies from 10 at Redoubt to 1000 at
    Kusatsu-Shirane and Galeras

From Kumagai and Chouet, GJI, 1999
11
Sompi method
  • One way to interpret Sompi results is to use
    numerical simulations (Kumagai and Chouet, JGR,
    2000)
  • Assume crack (rock) properties
  • Fix crack elastic parameters and dimensions
  • Vary density and VP of fluid
  • Generate synthetic LPs
  • Identify dominant frequencies
  • Estimate complex frequencies

12
  • Ranges of ?s and a for crack fluid
  • Qr - Almost monotonically increases with
    increasing impedance contrast, Z (?s?/?fa)
  • Dimensionless frequency decreases with increasing
    ?/a and ?f/?s

?/a
From Kumagai and Chouet, JGR, 2000
13
Sompi method
From Kumagai and Chouet, GJI, 1999
14
Sompi method
From Kumagai and Chouet, GJI, 1999
15
Sompi method
  • High Q is best explained by a dusty gas
  • Dust 1 ?m
  • Only tested fluid that can produce long-lived
    coda with Q significantly greater than 100
  • Low Q results can be explained by a variety of
    fluid mixtures
  • Frothy basalt
  • H2O gas- CO2 gas
  • Bubbly water
  • Dominant frequencies are different!
  • Crack dimensions are the same
  • Only the fluid content has changed

16
Sompi method
  • Qi can not generally be neglected
  • If Qi is low, there will be no resonance
  • Qi can vary over several orders of magnitude
    depending on, e.g.,
  • bubble radius
  • bubble density (gas fraction)
  • wavelength (frequency)
  • Simply varying the bubble radius can explain
    changes in Q over two orders of magnitude (Nakano
    et al., JGR, 1998)

17
Sompi method examples from Mt. Spurr, summer 2004
  • Long duration LPs (up to 40 s)
  • Sharp spectral peaks (.8 - 2.2 Hz)
  • Dominant frequency and Q varied with time
  • Generally declined
  • Q from 100 to 25
  • f from 2.2 to 0.8 Hz

18
Sompi method examples from Mt. Spurr, summer 2004
  • July, August, and Sept events on same two stations

19
Sompi method examples from Mt. Spurr, summer 2004
  • Sompi analysis of July, August, and Sept events

20
Sompi method examples from Mt. Spurr, summer 2004
  • Temporal variations of peak frequencies Q

21
Sompi method examples from Mt. Spurr, summer 2004
  • What caused temporal variation?
  • increased volatile content (drying out of crack)
  • Lower a and ?f
  • higher impedance contrast
  • Lower Qr
  • Depending on relative decreases in velocity and
    density, could explain decrease in frequency
  • Would lower bulk modulus of the fluid and lower
    crack stiffness
  • Should increase frequency!
  • Change in crack geometry
  • As crack stiffness increases, frequency decreases
  • Increased crack length or decrease in crack
    thickness would increase crack stiffness
  • Many causes and effects are interlinked and some
    are probably not well understood!

22
Characteristics of Deep Long Period Earthquakes
  • Deep!
  • lower crust or upper mantle
  • 10-40 km
  • P and S are both visible in some cases
  • S is predicted for some resonating source models
    (cracks, vertical pipes), but not all (sphere)
  • Sometimes have long, monotonic coda
  • Often have emergent onset
  • Observed in many areas
  • Hawaii
  • Alaska
  • Long Valley
  • Cascades
  • Japan

23
Characteristics of Deep Long Period Earthquakes
  • Enigmatic, but presumed to be related to fluids
  • sometimes related to eruptions, e.g.,
  • Pinatubo 1991
  • Spur 1992 (coincident)
  • Mauna Loa 2002 (inflation, not eruption)

24
Deep Long Period Earthquakes at Hawaii
  • Swarms of similar events observed
  • Swarm (31 events) preceded start of inflation of
    Mauna Loa
  • Large swarm in 2004-2005 modulated by teleseismic
    waves
  • Rate of occurrence declined following Sumatra
    MW9.3
  • Strong evidence for relationship to magma
    transport
  • Temporal relationship to inflation of Mauna Loa
  • Relatively stationary, non-destructive source

25
Deep Long Period Earthquakes at Hawaii
Okubo and Wolfe, JVGR, 2008
26
Deep Long Period Earthquakes at Hawaii
  • Subset of data from 2004-2005 swarm

Okubo and Wolfe, JVGR, 2008
27
Deep Long Period Earthquakes at Hawaii
  • Relocated earthquake locations
  • 50 were tossed
  • cross-correlation
  • double-difference
  • nearly identical source
  • Directly below inflation source

Okubo and Wolfe, JVGR, 2008
28
Deep Long Period Earthquakes in Aleutian Arc
  • Occur under 11 volcanoes
  • 10-45 km depth
  • Emergent onset
  • Extended coda
  • Peak frequency 1-3 Hz
  • Dominantly body wave energy
  • Solitary or sequences of events

29
Deep Long Period Earthquakes in Aleutian Arc
Power et al., JVGR, 2004
30
Deep Long Period Earthquakes in Aleutian Arc
Power et al., JVGR, 2004
31
Deep Long Period Earthquakes in Aleutian Arc
  • Other observations/inferrences from Power et al.,
    JVGR, 2004
  • Likely candidate for gas in magma is CO2
  • Pressure is too great for other volatiles to come
    out of solution
  • At Mammoth Mtn, CA deep (mid-crustal LPs)
    associated with increased CO2 flux at surface
  • DLPs are generally within 15 km of summit, not
    directly beneath
  • Mostly short period records
  • Some LPs have characteristics of known VLPs seen
    on short period stations at other volcanoes

32
Deep LP events at Mount Rainier
From Wendy McCausland, USGS
33
Deep LP events at Mount Rainier
Depth 10 13 km Spatially distinct from
Volcano-tectonic (VT) events Similar depth to
deepest VT events Reflect injection of basaltic
magma into system? Result from Resonance of
fluid-filled crack? Unsteady non-linear flow in
irregular conduit? Another yet unknown
mechanism?
From Wendy McCausland, USGS
34
DLPsFiltered for Low and High Frequencies
Deep LP events at Mount Rainier
From Wendy McCausland, USGS
35
Comparing a Long Period with a High Frequency
Event
Deep LP events at Mount Rainier
From Wendy McCausland, USGS
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com