Title: President's Hydrogen Fuel Initiative
1Successful Teams Announced
(1)
(1)
(1) Fuel cells supplied by Ballard
2Value of a Learning Demonstration
- Involves major stakeholders that will be
responsible for bringing vehicle and energy
technologies to consumers. - Brings energy and auto companies together during
research phase vs. commercialization or
regulatory phases where tension can occur - Ensures seamless integration of
vehicle/infrastructure interfaces. - Establishes real environment for safety,
codes/standards issues shared across teams. - Provides component data under real systems
context and operating conditions - This data is currently unavailable to the
government - Provides validation of technology status
important to public benefit (vehicle fuel
economy, fuel cell efficiency/durability, freeze
start ability, hydrogen cost and operating
range). - This data (under controlled methodology)
currently unavailable to the government - Communicates honest-broker progress and risk to
the public and Congress - Industry commitment (50 cost share)
3Learning Demonstration Description and
Performance Targets
- FY 2004 2009 Project Period
- Government / Industry cost shared co-operative
agreement - 190M government share subject to the
appropriations process - Two generations of vehicles
- Cold climates to be included by 2nd generation
- Renewable feedstock for H2 generation included
- Codes, Standards and Education integral to the
success of the project - Stationary facilities that co-produce electricity
and hydrogen are included
Key Targets
4Systems Analysis Modeling
Emissions Model (GREET)
Emissions Output
Onboard Storage (TIAX, ANL Model)
Delivery (H2A)
Fuel Cell Model (TIAX) (GC Tool) (Cost)
Hydrogen Production (H2A)
EnergyRaw Materials
Vehicle (PSAT)
H2
Vehicle Penetration Transition (HyTrans)
- Output
- H2 Cost
- Emissions
- Fuel Efficiency
- Fuel Use
Emissions Model (GREET)
Modeling and Analysis Outputs
5Systems Integration
The DOE should identify potentially useful
management tools and capabilities developed
elsewhere in the government for managing complex
programs and should evaluate their potential for
use in the hydrogen program. (NAS, Feb 04)
Established Systems Integration activity at NREL
- Develop program Integrated Baseline
- Combines Technical and Programmatic baselines
into a common tool for - Provides planning, execution monitoring, and
decision-making support - Systems Analysis support
- Develop Analysis Portfolio analysis/study tasks
needed to be performed by the program - Coordinate/perform independent analysis/studies
- Independent Technical Reviews
- Example On-Board Fuel Processing Go/No-Go
decision support in 2004 - Verification of Performance
- Underwriter Labs type of approach to verifying
reported progress toward achieving Technical
Targets - Configuration/Change Control and Risk Management
processes - Best practices from Federal Agencies/Industry,
modified for RD - Program Annual Peer Review
- Including FE, NE, and SC projects
6Extensive Coordination
- International Partnership for the Hydrogen
Economy - IPHE.net
- Interagency Hydrogen Research and Development
- Task Force (OSTP lead)
- www.hydrogen.gov
- Federal/State/local (Example)
- California Fuel Cell Partnership
- California Hydrogen Highway Network
72005 DOE Hydrogen Program Review May 23-26,
2005Crystal City Gateway Marriott, Arlington, VA
DOE Peer Review Technical Areas
8National Science and Technology Council
Manufacturing R D for the Hydrogen Economy
- Manufacturing challenges
- Developing innovative, low-cost fabrication
methods for new materials and applications - Adapting laboratory fabrication methods to
low-cost, high-volume production - Establishing and refining cost-effective
manufacturing techniques while hydrogen products
are still evolving - Meeting customer requirements for hydrogen
systems - Addressing the diversity and size of industries
in both the manufacturing and energy sectors - Developing a supplier network
9DOE Hydrogen Program Website