Sexually Explicit Advertisements: Does Rape Myth Differ - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 1
About This Presentation
Title:

Sexually Explicit Advertisements: Does Rape Myth Differ

Description:

Men and women who viewed advertisements depicting women as sex objects had ... To determine if men will report higher rape myth belief, hostile sexism, and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:81
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: victoria3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Sexually Explicit Advertisements: Does Rape Myth Differ


1
Sexually Explicit Advertisements Does Rape Myth
Differ?
Nichole Guenard (Professor Ellen Cohn, Faculty
Sponsor)
Introduction
Factor Analysis of the Advertisement
Adjectives _______________________________________
___________________________
LMP Factors
_______________________________ ITEMS
salience stimulation gratification
__________________________________________________
____________________ important for
me .85 .11 .15 creative .85 .29 .18 m
eaningful for me .84 .12 .16 clever .83
.32 .09 imaginative .79 .38 .22 helpful
.78 .02 .22 worth remembering .77 .11 .2
7 unique .76 .28 .25 convincing .72 .1
5 .15 dependable .68 .04 .19 wise .61
.18 .29 agreeable .58 .09 .31 novel .5
7 .18 .27 playful -.05 .81 .12 exciti
ng .35 .77 .19 lively .37 .77 .04 at
tractive .03 .72 .31 dreamy .03 .68 .5
5 vigorous .33 .64 .27 amusing .43 .6
1 .09 merry .45 .51 .26 tender .29
.28 .82 warm .25 .35 .78 soothing .33
.29 .78 sensitive .35 .26 .74 Reliabil
ity .98 .92 .93
  • The univariate analysis of variance also
    revealed an interaction between condition and sex
    for the gratification factor (F (2, 151) 6.41,
    p.002, Wilks lambda.91).
  • Men and women who viewed advertisements
    depicting women as sex objects had higher scores
    on rape myth belief scales and more negative
    attitudes toward women than men and women who
    viewed ads with progressive depictions of women
    or control advertisements (Lanis Covell, 1995).
  • Men and women who viewed advertisements
    depicting women as sex objects also had lower
    support for feminism and the womens movement
    than those in other conditions (McKay Covell,
    1997).
  • Sex object advertisements were rated as less
    appealing than progressive advertisements by
    women (McKay Covell, 1997).
  • When feminism and sexism were covaried,
    advertisement condition did not affect attitudes
    toward women (Decker, Bartel, Lenig, 2006).
  • Hostile and Benevolent Sexism have been
    postively correlated with rape myth acceptance
    scales and conservative feminism (Decker, Bartel,
    Lenig, 2006).

47.76
42.78
34.38
33.98
32.41
29.27
Purpose
  • To determine if sex object advertisements will
    be rated differently than progressive and control
    advertisements.
  • To determine if men and women will rate
    advertisements differently.
  • To determine if men will report higher rape myth
    belief, hostile sexism, and benevolent sexism
    than women in all conditions.
  • To determine if men in the sex object condition
    will report higher rape myth belief, hostile
    sexism, and benevolent sexism than men in
    progressive and control conditions.
  • To determine if rape myth belief, hostile sexism,
    and benevolent sexism scores affect ratings of
    advertisements in the absence of condition
    effects.



Men in the sex object and control conditions
rated the advertisements as more gratifying than
did women in all conditions and men in the
progressive condition.
  • The univariate analysis of variance revealed a
    main effect of condition (F (2,151) 25.32,
    p.001, Wilks lambda.37).

Method
50.96
  • The advertised products may have influenced the
    results. Future studies should examine the
    effects of varying products.
  • The influence of a female researcher may have
    influenced the scores on rape myth acceptance,
    hostile sexism, and benevolent sexism.
  • The presentation of the advertisements by
    PowerPoint slideshow may have also had an effect
    on the ratings of the advertisements.
  • Future studies should explore the connection
    between advertisement content, individual
    differences, and general appeal ratings.
  • It would be interesting to do the same study
    with a non-student population, age 18-24, as
    well as with other age groups to see if the
    findings replicate.

49.21
  • Participants
  • 170 undergraduate students from introductory
    psychology classes.
  • 90 women, 79 men
  • Mean age 18.83 years (SD 1.089)
  • Class 60 first year students
  • Procedure
  • Participants in each condition were asked to view
    five advertisements and to rate each
    advertisement on a scale of 32 adjectives.
    Participants were then asked to fill out a brief
    survey that measured rape myth belief, hostile
    and benevolent sexism, and demographics. Each
    scale item was measured on a seven-point Likert
    scale, from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly
    agree).

34.73
Sex object advertisements were rated as less
salient than progressive and control
advertisements by both men and women.
Results
  • The univariate analysis of variance revealed an
    interaction between condition and sex for the
    stimulation factor (F (2, 151) 4.21, p.02,
    Wilks lambda.91).

References
  • Data analysis
  • Factor analyzed the 32 adjectives used to rate
    the advertisements and calculated the
    reliabilities for the 3 factors that emerged.
  • Conducted a series of multivariate analyses of
    variance.
  • Conducted a multivariate analysis of covariance.
  • Findings
  • The factor analysis for the advertisement
    adjectives revealed 3 factors that were
    interpretable. Based on the reliability
    analysis, all 3 factors were used in further
    analyses.
  • The multivariate analyses of variance revealed a
    main effect for condition and interactions
    between condition and sex.
  • The multivariate analysis of covariance revealed
    a main effect for benevolent sexism. Univariate
    analyses showed that benevolent sexism was a
    significant predictor of salience and
    gratification factor ratings.
  • Sex differences were found for rape myth
    acceptance, hostile sexism, and benevolent
    sexism, with men scoring higher than women.

Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports
for rape. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 38, 217-230. Decker, C.W., Bartel,
J.S., Lenig, R. (2006). Do feminism and sexism
mediate the effect of sexy images on attitudes
toward women? Eastern Psychological Associations
Annual Meeting. Balitmore, MD. Glick, P. ,
Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism
inventory Differentiating hostile and
benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 70, 491-512. Lanis, K.,
Covell, K. (1995). Images of women in
advertisements Effects on attitudes related to
sexual aggression. Sex Roles, 32, 639-649.
McKay, N.J., Covell, K. (1997). The impact of
women in advertisements on attitudes toward
women. Sex Roles, 36, 573-583. Payne, D. L.,
Lonsway, K. A., Fitzgerald, L. F. (1999). Rape
myth acceptance Exploration of its structure
and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth
Acceptance Scale. Journal of Research in
Personality, 33, 27-68.
60.8
51.27
46.94
47.78
45.78
45.29

Men in the sex object condition rated the
advertisements as more stimulating than did men
in the other two conditions and women in all
conditions.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com