Critical perspective on Action Research for Postgraduate Researcher - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Critical perspective on Action Research for Postgraduate Researcher

Description:

Critical perspective on Action Research. for Postgraduate Researcher. SPARC 2004 ... Findings are dismissed as unscientific. Funding not allocated ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:155
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: AH50
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Critical perspective on Action Research for Postgraduate Researcher


1
Critical perspective on Action Research for
Postgraduate Researcher
Aleksej Heinze Supervisor Chris Procter
Advisor Elaine Ferneley E
A.Heinze_at_salford.ac.uk T 0161 295 5025
SPARC 2004
2
Overview
  • My Background
  • Research objective
  • Why use Action Research (AR)?
  • AR key players
  • Action Research critique
  • Personal experience
  • Good read

3
My Background
  • 2000 2003 Undergraduate student in the
    University of Salford
  • 2003 now Graduate Teaching Assistant (GTA) and
    a PhD student
  • Research objective
  • Improvement of undergraduate part time blended
    learning course (new since 2003)
  • (Blended Learning is the effective combination of
    different modes of delivery, models of teaching
    and styles of learning Procter, 2003)

4
Action Research what is it?
  • AR is an interventionist approach to the
    acquisition of scientific knowledge that has
    sound foundations in the post-positivist
    tradition. (Baskerville and Wood-Harper 1996).
  • The application focus of AR involves solving
    organisational problems through intervention
    while at the same time contributing to
    knowledge. (Davison et. al. 2004)
  • AR aims to contribute both to the practical
    concerns of people in an immediate problematic
    situation and to the goals of social science by
    joint collaboration within a mutually accepted
    ethical framework. (Susman and Evered, 1978)
  • Learning by doing (OBrien)

5
Action Research framework
Reconnaissance Fact finding
Initial idea
Form General Plan
Diagnostic
Amend Plan
Evaluate
Monitor
Action steps 1,2,3
Therapeutic
Implement
Figure 1. Lewins cyclic model.
6
Why use Action Research?
  • Why AR? (consultancy mode Actiongt Reflectiongt
    Theory)
  • Intervention in the situation not possible with
    Case Study (except action case)
  • Relevance to the real world (unlike experiments)
  • Supervisor is the course director
  • Allows broad research question?
  • Highlights the Social aspect of systems
  • Cyclical framework of continuous improvement that
    is well-suited to organisational change linking
    theory and practice
  • Means of generating and immediately testing
    knowledge

7
Some of the key players
  • John Dewey 1920 30 No action without
    research, and no research without action.
    (educational philosopher) gt Educational AR
  • Kurt Lewin (social and experimental psychologist)
    in the 1940s expanded on AR gt Traditional AR
  • Eric Trist (social psychiatrist) Tavistock Clinic
    similar approach used after WWII gt Contextual AR
    (action learning)
  • Decisions are best implemented by those who help
    make them
  • Marxian and practice orientation of Antonio
    Gramsci gt Radical AR
  • Lippit and Lippet 1978 consulting development
  • Levins 6 stage cycle Analysis gt Fact Finding gt
    Conceptualisation gt Planning gt Implementation of
    action gt Evaluation
  • Educational settings i.e. Gilly Salmon
  • Susman and Evered 1978 connection to IS
    social System
  • Checkland 1981 Developed the Soft Systems
    Approach using AR

8
What Action Research?
  • Canonical action research
  • Information Systems Prototyping
  • Soft Systems
  • Action Science
  • Participant Observation
  • Action Learning
  • Multiview
  • ETHICS
  • Clinical Field Work
  • Process Consulting
  • Reflective System Development
  • Collaborative practice
  • Participatory research
  • Collaborative inquiry
  • Emancipatory research
  • Action Learning
  • Contextual action research

9
AR Philosophy issues
  • Tends to focus on the social and psychological
    aspects (but can be positivist, Klein and Myers
    1999)
  • Consequences
  • Findings are dismissed as unscientific
  • Funding not allocated
  • Accept findings in good faith or author
    reputation
  • Engage with the philosophical literature
  • Localised acceptance of findings (Supervisor vs.
    Examiner)
  • AR is an example of the post-positivist
    methods
  • Empirical - Interpretive
  • Experimental - Multivariable
  • Observational Interventionist

10
Dilemma 1 interpretation vs. intervention
Change (intervention)
Prediction (Reduction)
Understanding (Interpretation)
Vidgen and Braa (1997)
11
Action research gt big dilemma?
  • Consultancy vs. Research gt contribution to
    knowledge
  • Research is more rigorously documented
  • Researches are theoretical vs. Consultants are
    empirical
  • Consultants work on smaller budgets and time
    constraints
  • Research is cyclical but consultancy is linear
  • When to stop iterations.
  • Research with little action or action with
    little research
  • Impartiality of the researcher not only AR
    related

12
More horns of the dilemma
  • Lack of rigour gt use of valid research tools
  • Researcher becoming to involved and neglects
    science
  • AR is context bound replication and
    understanding what caused particular effects are
    difficult
  • Dilemmas
  • Ethics - Personal over-involvement with the
    research, Goals Subject and Science
  • Initiatives disinterested pursuit of knowledge

13
Personal experience
  • High responsibility towards the research subjects
  • Ethical approval
  • Political issues
  • Need a research question/ focus
  • Heavy reliance on communication
  • Difficult to adhere to the cycles
  • Need rigour to be regarded as scientific
  • How do you generate theory after all theory is
    the bit PhD students need

14
Some starting pointers
  • www.qual.auckland.ac.nz
  • http//www.scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/ari/arihome.h
    tml
  • Braa, K. and R. Vidgen (1999). "Interpretation,
    intervention, and reduction in the organisational
    laboratory a framework for in-context
    information system research." Accounting
    Management and Information Technologies 9 25-47.
  • Baskerville, R. L. and A. T. Wood-Harper (1996).
    "A critical perspective on action research as a
    method for information systems research." Journal
    of information technology JIT 11(3) 235.

15
Conclusions
  • AR has many faces
  • AR will be capable of providing a framework for
    PhD research
  • Framework with limitations but others have
    similar issues without the advantages
  • Need to have a good theory generation strategy
    combination with Grounded Theory

16
Questions please
  • Critical perspective on Action Research for
    Postgraduate Researcher
  • Aleksej Heinze
  • E A.Heinze_at_salford.ac.uk
  • T 0161 295 5025
  • SPARC 2004
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com