January 31, 2006 POLS 4300'06

1
January 31, 2006POLS 4300.06

• Today, HG, chaps 11-14, pp. 196-270
• Implementation, Evaluation, Policy Succession and
  Termination, Conclusion
• Implementation one central concern of the course
  along with needs assessment, efficiency/effectiven
  ess and success
• At least as political value laden as
  legislative/governmental policy making

2
January 31, 2006POLS 4300.06

• Non and unsuccessful implementation
• Synonyms execution, enforcement, application,
  administration
• Should add selective enforcement fact often
  no intent to really implement at all
• Thus a part of policy making for good and bad
  reasons
• Perfect implementation(?), pp. 198-206

3
January 31, 2006POLS 4300.06

• Top down bottom up approaches to
  implementation, pp. 206-218
• Evaluation, a process running from forecasting
  through implementation
• Problems of evaluating policy, pp. 222-228
• Systematic evaluation techniques 228-234
• Who carries out evaluations?, pp. 234-237
• Evaluation,consumptionutilization234-40

4
January 31, 2006POLS 4300.06

• Forms of succession termination,241-45
• Succession or termination?, pp. 245-246
• Difficulties aids in securing, pp 246-250
• Designing for future succession or termination
  problems strategies250-260
• Conclusion the analysis of policy /in its
  political setting, pp. 263-268
• Policy analysis uses roles, pp.268-70

5
January 31, 2006POLS 4300.06

• Quade and Carter,chaps 19-21, pp.338-89
• Implementation difficulties, pp. 338-343
• Models analytical time, pp. 343-350
• Pitfalls limitationsMisconceptions 351-58
• Pitfalls limitations the analyst, 358-367
• Pitfallslimitationsuses ofanalysis367-372
• A model rather than people? 370-372

6
January 31, 2006POLS 4300.06

• Feasibility, ethics and practical help373-89
• Difference between political and policy
  analytical approaches to decision, p.375
• Value Laden vs value aware, 377-381
• Reducing uncertainty strategies, 382-385
• Increasing the value of Policy Analysis pp.
  385-389