Land, Growth - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Land, Growth

Description:

Resource Lands Assessment (RLA) to be completed in late 2003. ... End Transportation Workgroup - Seek appropriate membership to accomplish C2K commitments ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:74
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: nitasyl
Category:
Tags: end | growth | land | lands

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Land, Growth


1
Land, Growth Stewardship Subcommittee
  • Progress and Vision for Success
  • Briefing for the Implementation Committee

Ted Graham, Chair LGSS October 2, 2003
2
Purpose of Briefing
  • Provide update on LGSS C2K actions
  • Describe LGSS vision for success
  • Seek IC acceptance of commitment status report
  • Seek IC guidance/decision
  • Land Conservation Keystone
  • Development, Redevelopment Keystone

3
LGSS Mission
  • develop and promote sound land use practices
    which
  • protect and restore watershed resources and water
    quality,
  • maintain reduced pollutant loadings for the bay
    and its tributaries, and
  • restore and preserve aquatic living resources.

4
LGSS Focus for Action
  • 1. Strengthening state and local programs
  • 2. Tracking measuring performance
  • Identifying barriers to and incentives for
    environmentally sensitive design
  • Developing guidance and tools
  • 5. Providing training, technical and financial
    assistance

5
C2K Responsibilities
  • Sound Land Use section of C2K
  • 23 commitments in four subsections
  • Development, Redevelopment Revitalization (DRR)
  • Land Conservation (LC)
  • Public Access
  • Transportation

6
Two Keystone Commitments
  • Land Preservation Strengthen programs for land
    acquisition and preservation within each state
    that are supported by funding and target the most
    valued lands for protection. Permanently
    preserve from development 20 percent of the land
    area in the watershed by 2010. (4.1.3)
  • Harmful Sprawl - By 2012, reduce the rate of
    harmful sprawl development of forest and
    agricultural land in the Chesapeake Bay by 30
    percent measured as an average over five years
    from the baseline of 1992-1997, with measures and
    progress reported regularly to the Chesapeake
    Executive Council. (4.2.1)

7
LGSS Membership
  • Federal
  • EPA-CBPO, NPS, USGS USFS
  • State
  • MD MDOT, DNR, MDP
  • VA DCR, CBLAD
  • DC DOH
  • PA DEP Gov. Ctr. For LG Assistance
  • Chesapeake Bay Commission
  • Local
  • WashCOG
  • LGAC staff
  • Other
  • CBF
  • MD Builders Association
  • VA Conservation Network

Additional local government participation would
be beneficial
8
Implementation Committee
Resource Lands Assessment Task Force
Tax Policy Advisory Panel (finished)
Land, Growth and Stewardship Subcommittee
RLATF Technical Team
Development Workgroup
Land Conservation Workgroup
Public Access Workgroup
Transportation Workgroup
9
Relationship Between States and LGSS
  • Most of C2K commitments being accomplished
    through state/on-going programs
  • Opportunities for CBP to provide technical and/or
    policy support of state programs
  • LGSS opportunity/responsibility Continued need
    for effective education and outreach efforts

10
Public Access Commitments(Lead Responsibility)
  • 4.4.1 30 more access points
  • States
  • 4.4.2 500 more miles of water trails
  • States Gateway Network
  • 4.4.3 Enhance interpretive materials
  • Comm. Educ. Subcomm. Gateway Network
  • 4.4.4 Partnerships with at least 30 sites
  • Gateway Network

Bold Completed or ongoing with no
concerns Italics In progress
11
Public Access Accomplishments
  • 698 Public Access sites (107 more needed)
  • 1498.5 Water Trail miles as of 7-03
    (Commitment exceeded)
  • 123 designated Gateways as of 3-03 (Commitment
    exceeded)
  • Between 2000 and 2003, awarded about 3
    million of National Park Service funds, plus
    equal non-federal match
  • CB Gateways Network-wide conference Nov.
    2003

12
Land Conservation Commitments
  • 4.1.1 Assessment of resource lands
  • Ad hoc task force
  • 4.1.2 Financial Assistance
  • States
  • 4.1.3 Preserve 20 / Target Most Valued Lands
    (Keystone)
  • States
  • 4.1.4 Technical assistance
  • LGSS
  • 4.1.5 GIS for tracking
  • IMSC

13
Progress Status in Brief
  • 4.1.1 Assessment of resource lands
  • Draft report in late 2003
  • 4.1.2 Financial Assistance
  • Funding levels down
  • 4.1.3 Preserve 20 / Target Most Valued Lands
    (Keystone)
  • Funding levels down use R.L.A. for targeting
  • See subsequent slides
  • 4.1.4 Technical assistance
  • LGSS Training/Tech Assistance
  • 4.1.5 GIS for tracking
  • Programs under development

Bold Completed or ongoing with no
concerns Italics In progress
14
Land Conservation Keystone (4.1.3)
  • Strengthen programs for land acquisition and
    preservation within each state that are supported
    by funding and target the most valued lands for
    protection. Permanently preserve from
    development 20 percent of the land area in the
    watershed by 2010.

15
Background On Meeting the 20 Goal
  • From CBC/TPL 2001 Report, Keeping Our
    Commitment
  • If funding continues at current 2000 rates
    adjusted for inflation, our existing programs
    will likely conserve an additional half million
    acres by 2010.
  • An estimated 1.8 billion over 10 years
    required

16
Land Conservation Vision for Success
  • 20 Land Preservation Measurement
  • 2. Target the Most Valued and Vulnerable Resource
    Lands
  • 3. CBP Support Facilitate Efforts of States,
    NGOs and Local Governments

17
1. 20 Land Preservation Measurement
  • Preserved land baseline and tracking system
    now established
  • As of July 2003, 19 (6.6 million acres) of the
    watershed preserved
  • About 359,000 more acres needed to meet goal
  • Decrease from about 1 million to 359,000 acres
    based on more accurate PA data old estimate was
    based on county-wide SCORP data and counted lands
    outside CB watershed.

18
1. 20 Land Preservation Measurement
  • CONCERN
  • Current state economic conditions and reduced
    funding levels mean that reaching the goal is in
    jeopardy.

19
2. Target Most Valued and Vulnerable Resource
Lands
  • Resource Lands Assessment (RLA) to be
    completed in late 2003.
  • Will identify the most valued lands in terms of
  • Water quality
  • Habitat
  • Agricultural and forest economics, and
  • Cultural resources.
  • Will also identify land most vulnerable to
    development.

Next step Assess how the RLA can support state
land conservation programs.
20
3. CBP Support Facilitate Efforts of States,
NGOs Local Governments
  • Collaboration of states in achieving land
    conservation and in seeking additional federal
    and private funds for preservation.
  • Training coordinator to promote land
    conservation.
  • Target outreach to appropriate audiences
  • Promote land conservation in other efforts
    such as watershed planning.

21
IC Decisions
LGSS recommends IC endorse this vision for
success in meeting the land conservation
keystone commitment.
  • 20 goal Watershed-wide or state-specific goal?
  • Commit to regional collaboration to secure other
    sources of funding, such as federal funds

22
Lands Preserved by Jurisdiction
  • PA
  • - 3,001,736 acres preserved (20.7)
  • MD
  • - 1,219,460 acres preserved (19.6) - 22,145
    acres to reach 20
  • VA
  • - 2,333,379 acres preserved (16.9)
  • - 432,999 acres to reach 20
  • Draft data

23
DRR Commitments (Part 1)
  • 4.1.2 Reduce rate of sprawl
  • States
  • 4.2.2 Impediments to LID
  • States
  • 4.2.3 Sound land use planning practices
  • States
  • 4.2.4 Tax policies
  • States
  • 4.2.5 - Redevelopment
  • States

24
DRR Commitments (Part 2)
  • 4.2.6 Analytical Tools
  • LGSS
  • 4.2.7 Ecologically-based Design
  • LGSS
  • 4.2.8 Sound land use outreach education
  • States
  • 4.2.9 Development where infrastructure exists
  • States
  • 4.2.10 Effectiveness of local SWM SC programs
  • States

Bold Completed or ongoing with no
concerns Italics In progress
25
DRR Progress Status in Brief (Part 1)
  • 4.1.2 Reduce rate of sprawl
  • Baseline to be established see DRR vision
  • 4.2.2 Impediments to LID
  • On-going state programs CBP training/tech
    assistance
  • 4.2.3 Sound land use planning practices
  • On-going state programs CBP training/tech
    assistance
  • 4.2.4 Tax policies
  • ELI report completed states reviewing
    recommendations
  • 4.2.5 - Redevelopment
  • On-going state programs CBP training/tech
    assistance

Bold Completed or ongoing with no
concerns Italics In progress
26
DRR Progress Status in Brief (Part 2)
  • 4.2.6 Analytical Tools
  • - LGSS training/tech assistance Brochure almost
    online
  • 4.2.7 Ecologically-based Design
  • LGSS training/tech assistance Brochure almost
    online
  • 4.2.8 Sound land use outreach education
  • LGSS training/tech assistance
  • 4.2.9 Development where infrastructure exists
  • 4.2.10 Effectiveness of local SWM SC programs

Bold Completed or ongoing with no
concerns Italics In progress
27
Focus for DRR
  • Keystone Commitment By 2012, reduce the rate of
    harmful sprawl development of forest and
    agricultural land in the Chesapeake Bay by 30
    percent.
  • Focus
  • Track Land Conversion
  • Work toward sound land use planning and
    implementation
  • Promote the LGSS Principles of Good Development

28
Vision for Development, Redevelopment Keystone
Commitment
  • Development patterns that reflect sound land use
    planning principles.
  • 2. Integration of sound land use watershed
    management planning.
  • 3. Integration of ecologically-based site
    designs.
  • 4. Effective training and technical assistance
    Critical to attain vision

29
Development patterns reflect sound land use
planning
  • Develop indicators of patterns of development.
  • Explore how such indicators could
  • - Focus on areas likely to have the most impact.
  • - Focus training and technical assistance.
  • - Influence implementation of tributary
    strategies.

CONCERN In addition to tracking land
conversion, it is also important that development
reflects sound land use practices.
30
2. Integration of sound land use and watershed
management planning.
  • Continue to work with NPS on Community Watershed
    Dialogues.
  • Highlight success stories through case studies
    workshops
  • Outreach to local land use planning agencies

31
3. Integration of ecologically-based designs in
meeting nutrient/sediment goals.
  • Combine site design with on-site practices to
  • Conserve natural areas.
  • Reduce impervious cover and stormwater pollution.
  • Maintain predevelopment hydrological functions.

32
4. Training Technical Assistance Program.
  • Concentrate training technical assistance
    program where it can be most effective.
  • Work with the ACB Training Coordinator to focus
    approach.

33
IC Endorsement of DRR Keystone Vision
LGSS recommends IC endorse this vision for
success for DRR keystone commitment. -
Critical to supporting this vision is support of
training/ technical assistance program.
34
IC Decision on Tracking Harmful Sprawl commitment
(September 2002)
  • Conversion of forests and agricultural lands
  • Metric to track 30 reduction in harmful sprawl
  • RESAC will be used to measure conversion
  • Baseline rate of conversion use 1990 and 2000
    land cover and impervious cover
  • Future timeframes to be identified.

35
Setting Land Conversion Baseline In Progress
  • RESAC land cover data not available until Dec.
    2003.
  • RESAC draft impervious cover data available
    (biased towards high/medium density development).
  • Explore NRI 2002 results and compare with RESAC
    land cover data, if needed.
  • STAY TUNED!

36
Implementation Committee
Resource Lands Assessment Task Force
Tax Policy Advisory Panel (finished)
Land, Growth and Stewardship Subcommittee
RLATF Technical Team
Development Workgroup
Land Conservation Workgroup
Public Access Workgroup
Transportation Workgroup
37
Issues to Consider for LGSS structure
  • Land Conservation Workgroup and role of Resource
    Lands Assessment Task Force.
  • Closer relationship between CWiC (watershed
    management group) and LGSS.
  • Keep in mind during IC Dec. meeting on R.L.A.
    CWiC

38
Transportation Workgroup
Issue Transportation Workgroup in Transition
Options LGSS may pursue - Transform workgroup
to Bay-wide advisory group. - End
Transportation Workgroup - Seek appropriate
membership to accomplish C2K commitments
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com