The Key Tool in Energy Management - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 108
About This Presentation
Title:

The Key Tool in Energy Management

Description:

Provides excellent basis to identify, justify and monitor major projects ... Compressed air leakage minimised saving 30K. Group CIP benchmarking exercise. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:104
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 109
Provided by: rayglu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Key Tool in Energy Management


1
Monitoring and Targeting
  • The Key Tool in Energy Management
  • Andrew Ibbotson
  • Joe Flanagan

2
Monitoring and Targeting (MT)
  • Provides lowest payback savings
  • Provides excellent basis to identify, justify and
    monitor major projects
  • Provides most robust way of reporting back to
    Govt.

3
What is MT
  • A management tool to help reduce energy and
    utility usage using a proven methodology.
  • A rigorous and well structured analysis of energy
    and production data
  • Identification of new cost saving opportunities
  • Maintains saving performance

4
The energy management process
5
MT System
Scoping Study
PeopleManagement ProcessesAwareness
Motivation Training
SystemsMetering Data Acquisition Software Analy
sis and Reporting
TechnologyProject Identification Financial
EvaluationEngineering
Integration
6
Site Commitment
  • Gain senior management commitment
  • Construct / develop site energy and environmental
    policy
  • Develop a specific implementation plan
  • Time scales
  • Resources (site metering and capital funds)
  • Performance measures
  • Project champion and site team

7
Awareness Motivation
  • High profile project launch meetings
  • Define departmental reporting system
  • Start training programme (software, methodology
    technical)
  • Implement communications programme (policy,
    reports competitions)

8
Training
  • Methodology
  • Principles of a MT programme
  • Technology
  • Boilers, Steam Systems, Refrigeration, Compressed
    Air, Drives Motors, Lighting, Process Systems
  • Software
  • Data collection systems, MT software and
    opportunities database

9
Metering Review and Data Collection
  • Map the utility, resource and production networks
  • Establish the data collection methods
  • Manual, Psion, File Transfer, Mixture
  • Model the site in software
  • Establish correlation and KPIs
  • Develop specific reports utilising MT
  • Boilerhouse, Refrigeration, CCL, Production,
    KPIs

10
Inputs
11
Data Collection and Analysis
Using a Spreadsheet
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
Opportunity Database
  • Captures all improvement ideas
  • Allocates individual responsibility with
    deadlines
  • Monitors idea progress
  • Describes and quantifies the opportunities
  • Potential Savings
  • Investment Required
  • Priority (Payback, Technical Difficulty)
  • Reports the total project status

20
(No Transcript)
21
Opportunity Data Base
22
Project Review
  • Monthly Steering Group Meeting
  • Total Savings
  • Energy Usage
  • Projects/Environmental Improvements
  • Costs
  • The MT Quality System
  • Software Standards
  • Training and Programme Standards

23
Project Implementation
24
Case Study - UK Dairy Group
  • 5 Site parallel implementation across UK
  • 5 Teams of 6 people
  • 20 Utility Sub Meters per site (10 water 10
    electric) 30K
  • enManage implementation costs 120 K
  • Utilities Savings 300,000
  • Packaging Savings 200,000
  • Product Savings 750,000
  • Total 1,250,000

25
Case Study - UK Dairy Group
  • Projects
  • Group condensate recovery improved from 15 to
    80. Water, effluent, gas and chemical savings
    60K. (Improved boiler response)
  • Compressed air leakage minimised saving 30K
  • Group CIP benchmarking exercise. Savings cica
    120K

26
The Rewards
  • Resource cost savings - scope to save
  • Utilities 5 - 15
  • Raw Materials up to 1
  • Packaging 5
  • Environmental Compliance
  • IPPC
  • ISO 14001
  • Low Risk

27
Setting Up MTData Collection and Meters
28
Objectives
  • To determine what should be monitored
  • To determine areas of accountability
  • To determine costs of further monitoring
    equipment required
  • To propose a cost effective solution

29
Some Initial Thoughts
  • How are energy costs monitored?
  • Who is acountable for usage?
  • Is the company using energy efficiently?

30
Typical Scenario
  • Canned food manufacturer
  • Energy costs 800,000 (120,000) per annum
  • Average monthly bills
  • Electricity 40,000
  • Gas 26,000
  • Bills passed to Services Department for checking
  • Bill paid by the Finance Department
  • Did they use energy efficiently?

31
Is Energy Used Efficiently?
  • How do we measure performance?
  • Who do we make accountable?
  • How do we make sure we achieve minimum energy
    costs?

32
Monitoring Systems
33
Who is Accountable for the Energy
34
Information Required Prior to Audit
  • 12 monthly energy bills and costs
  • Distribution line drawings of all utilities
  • Gas
  • Electricity
  • Steam
  • Water etc.
  • 12 monthly production figures
  • Major plant ratings

35
Electrical Audit
  • Determine major loads from distribution board
    ammeters
  • Estimate weekly running hours
  • Balance against weekly total of electricity
    consumed

36
Oil/Gas/Steam/Water Audit
  • Can estimate against plant ratings and running
    hours
  • Production load should be taken into account
  • Balance against weekly total consumed
  • Typically simpler than for electricity as fewer
    and better defined users.

37
Steel Company
  • UTILITY BILL 5 Million
  • Savings potential 2 ? 100,000
  • Metering costs depend on payback criteria
  • 12 months payback 100,000

38
Typical Energy Balance
Plant/Area
kWh/wk
/wk
p.a.
Air Compressors
10,000 18,000
800
40,000
1440
72,000
Fridge Compressors
36,000
Bottling Line
9,000
720
Sterilising Line
12,000
960 640
48,000
Cold stores
8,000
32,000
240
12,000
Offices
3,000
General Lighting Main Hall Ventilation
5,000
400 480
20,000
24,000
6,000
7,000
560
28,000
Boilerhouse
11,000
880
44,000
Cartoning
Unaccounted Balance
11,000
880
44,000
TOTAL
100,000
8000
400,000
39
Metering Justification
  • C A P t
  • 100
  • C Justifiable submetering expenditure ()
  • A Annual energy costs ()
  • P Potential savings (percentage)
  • t Acceptable payback period (years)

40
Typical Values of P
  • Electricity 3
  • Gas/Oil 5
  • Steam 5
  • Water 5-10
  • Comp. Air 10

41
Metering Approach
  • Take 1 Million p.a. bill (Electric)
  • 3 savings- 30,000
  • Typically 20 meters (installed)
  • Start with main services
  • Air Comps.
  • Fridge Comps.
  • Boilerhouse
  • Apportion remainder as distribution boards dictate

42
Department and Energy Account Centre (EACs)
  • Definable areas - Department
  • Definable plant - EAC
  • Preferably Accountable to one person - EAC
  • Significant energy costs - EAC

43
Metering
44
Electricity Meters
  • Simple and accurate
  • Relatively cheap
  • Turn down ratio - most current transformers
    inaccurate below 20 full current
  • Majority of installation can be done whilst board
    is live
  • Install meters with kWh kW read-out

45
Flow Meters
  • Different Types
  • Different Fluids
  • Accuracy Considerations
  • Installation Considerations

46
Flow Meters
  • Orifice Plate Meters
  • Variable Area Meters
  • Turbine Meters
  • Vortex Shredding Meters
  • Electromagnetic Meters
  • Ultrasonic Meters
  • Rotating Lobe Meters
  • Rotary Piston Meters
  • Diaphragm Meters

47
Gas Meters
  • Suitable meters include
  • turbine
  • diaphragm
  • rotating lobe
  • Temperature and pressure compensation needed,
    ideally automatic for larger users
  • Fairly accurate /-1
  • Typical costs
  • 25mm 50mm 80mm
  • Turbine - 1,800 2,700
  • Diaphragm 300 1,200 -

48
Steam Meters
  • Suitable meter types include
  • Orifice plate
  • Variable area
  • Vortex shedding
  • Rotary shunt
  • Relatively expensive
  • Accurate sizing very important
  • Temperature and Pressure correction essential
  • High on maintenance costs
  • Adequate removal of condensate to stop water
    hammer is essential

49
Steam Meter Costs
Includes automatic pressure compensation
50
Water Meters
  • Suitable meters include
  • Rotary piston
  • Turbine
  • Vortex shedding
  • Ultrasonic
  • Electromagnetic
  • Standard meters accept 40oC
  • Relatively cheap if use positive displacement
    meters
  • Critical for control of steam usage in some cases
  • Check flow rates accurately and reduce pipe
    diameter if possible

51
Water Meter Costs
52
Compressed Air Meters
  • Suitable meter types include
  • Orifice plate
  • Variable area
  • Turbine
  • Vortex shedding
  • Metering considerations similar to those for
    steam
  • Expensive, similar to steam meters
  • Pressure and temperature compensation needed

53
Heat Meters
  • Measures flowrate, flow temperature and return
    temperature to calculate heat usage
  • Expensive
  • Accuracy of temperature measurement must be high
    as the temperature difference can be small

54
Oil Meters
  • Suitable meters include
  • Turbine
  • Rotary Piston
  • Easy to install
  • Relatively cheap i.e. around 1000
  • Density (i.e. Temperature) compensation needed
  • Beware of supply/return line burners!
  • Tank dipping not sufficiently accurate

55
Installation
  • In-house or sub-contract
  • Ease of access/remote reading
  • Correct units m3/gallons
  • Dont underestimate costs
  • Allow reasonable time-scale
  • Install meters with a 4-20 mA or pulse output if
    available

56
Data Collection
57
Data Collection
  • All Meter readings
  • Production Data
  • Ambient Temperature Data (degree days)
  • Auxiliary Data

58
Meter Reading Frequency
  • Monthly
  • Weekly
  • Daily
  • Each shift
  • Each batch

59
Data Collection Methods
  • Manual
  • Hand held data logger
  • Totally automatic

60
Manual / Portable Data Logger
  • Allow 1 minute/meter
  • Ensure meters read at same time each week
  • Ensure at least 2 people know location of all
    meters
  • Produce meter reading form to reduce errors

61
Automatic Data Logger
  • Worthwhile for larger users
  • Allow at least double meter costs for automatic
    data collection
  • Cannot be justified on cost savings alone, must
    have additional benefits such as process control
  • Can lead to data saturation

62
Error Checking
  • Meters with consistent errors can still be used
    since we are looking at trends in consumption
  • Digit errors most common, normally compensated
    for at next reading
  • Watch for meters going round the clock
  • Software should pick up significant data entry
    errors

63
Production Data
  • Often not available straight away
  • Energy monitoring period must be in line with
    production monitoring
  • Collect all data to start with and then simplify
    later
  • Simplify production data as much as possible,
    hopefully to overall tonnage

64
Ambient Temperature
  • Degree day data
  • Manual collection
  • Max/min thermometers
  • Automatic collection
  • Degree day logger
  • Meteorological office
  • Important

65
Degree Days
66
Auxiliary Data
  • Hours Run
  • Compressors
  • Large fans
  • Machinery
  • Process Parameters
  • Temperature
  • Pressures
  • Raw materials

67
Setting Targets
68
Data Processing Options
  • Spreadsheets
  • Databases
  • Statistics Software
  • Utility Software

69
Requirements of Data Processing
  • System should
  • be easy to use
  • be flexible and extensible
  • link to existing data and systems
  • provide a powerful tool for identification and
    analysis of savings opportunities
  • provide true measure of performance
  • empower managers to improve efficiency
  • make individuals responsible

70
Preliminary Data Analysis
  • For preliminary target setting
  • Preferably regression analysis
  • Requires familiarity with the process

71
Types of Target
  • E a
  • (constant)
  • E a bP
  • (single regression)
  • E a bP1 cP2 _ _ _ _
  • Non-linear relationship

72
E Constant
73
Single Regression
74
(No Transcript)
75
(No Transcript)
76
(No Transcript)
77
(No Transcript)
78
Correlation Significance
  • Minimum value of r such that odds are 100 to 1
    against it being due to chance

79
Multi-Regression
  • More than 1 variable
  • Try to keep to a maximum of three variables
  • Only use if you are sure of the relationship
    since regression is not very accurate on few data
    points

80
(No Transcript)
81
(No Transcript)
82
(No Transcript)
83
(No Transcript)
84
What Does Energy Use Depend On?
  • Output/Input
  • (Production, Work Content)
  • Plant running time
  • Temperature
  • (Product, External)
  • Other factors
  • Water content, Raw materials,
  • Exothermic Reactions, Endothermic Reactions

85
Utility Dependency at a Dairy Water vs Milk
Throughput
86
Utility Dependency at a Dairy Water vs
Production Hours
87
Endothermic reaction
88
Reporting and Sustaining the Programme
89
Need for Reporting
  • To keep people informed of their weekly
    performance (against Key Performance Indicators,
    regression targets)
  • To monitor long term progress
  • To create feedback on improvements made
  • To motivate people to improve

90
Reporting Frequency
  • Weekly
  • Monthly
  • Quarterly
  • Annually

91
Typical Weekly Report for a Milk
Processing Department
92
Typical Weekly Site
Summary Report for a Diary
93
Monthly Report
  • Summation of 4 or 5 weeks
  • In line with cost accounting procedures for
    monthly costing and monthly budgeting
  • Year to date variance also important

94
Trend Graphs
95
Energy Consumption
Energy (000s KWh)
Target
Actual
Week Number
96
Variance
Variance (000s KWh/wk)
15
10
5
0
-5
-10
-15
-20
Week Number
97
Cusum (Cumulative Sum)
TARGET
ACTUAL
VARIANCE
CUSUM
(KWh)
(KWh)
(KWh)
(KWh)
210,000 225,000 220,000 210,000 230,000 240,000 23
0,000 220,000 220,000 225,000
200,000 210,000 210,000 200,000 235,000 250,000 24
0,000 235,000 230,000 230,000
10,000 15,000 10,000 10,000
-5,000 -10,000 -10,000 -15,000 -20,000 -5,000
10,000 25,000 35,000 45,000 40,000 30,000 2
0,000 5,000 -15,000 -20,000
98
Cusum Plot
Cusum ()
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
-500
-1000
Week Number
99
Arc Furnaces Energy Savings
Cumulative sum of A SHIFT
Cumulative sum of B SHIFT
()
Cumulative sum of C SHIFT
Cumulative sum of D SHIFT
WEEK
100
Organisation for Action
101
All Levels have a Role
  • Chief Executive
  • Commitment, Leadership
  • Production Managers
  • Holds departmental budgets
  • Chief Engineer
  • Designs process, facilitates production
  • Energy Manager
  • Investigates, monitors, facilitates
  • Line Personnel
  • Use and save energy

14
102
Energy Management in Action
  • Nominate an energy manager (project champion)
  • Establish an energy steering group
  • Set up energy improvement teams
  • Improve communication awareness

103
The Tasks of the Energy Manager/Project Champion
  • Promote projects within the company
  • Develop the action plan
  • Identify, train and co-ordinate teams
  • Discuss resources and timescales with senior
    management
  • Measure progress
  • Report frequently, simply and clearly
  • Promote project successes

104
Energy Steering Group
  • Senior Management
  • Production Managers
  • Engineering Manager
  • Project Champion
  • Finance/Quality People

105
Steering Group Purpose
  • To discuss weekly, monthly, quarterly performance
  • To discuss actions necessary to improve
    performance
  • To allocate specific tasks to members of the team
  • To assess success of actions
  • Meets every 1-2 months to review progress

106
Role of the Improvement Team(s)
  • Monitor plant performance
  • observation
  • audits
  • Identify problem areas
  • Brainstorming sessions
  • Identify opportunities
  • Monitor implemented solutions
  • Meet every 2-4 weeks

107
Communication
  • Are staff aware of
  • The site energy strategy?
  • Energy usage on site and the associated costs?
  • Energy reduction projects implemented?
  • The impact of their own role on energy costs?

108
Typical Forms of Communication
  • Training
  • Newsletters and magazines
  • Press
  • Posters and stickers
  • Videos
  • Presentations and briefings
  • Reports on actions and on progress
  • Public displays of achievements

109
Typical Problems
  • Apathy
  • Lack of ownership and accountability
  • Lack of understanding of targeting process
  • Data errors
  • Lack of resources
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com