Rationales, Prioritization, and Building the Business Case - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Rationales, Prioritization, and Building the Business Case

Description:

upgrading to meet minimum safety and design standards, accessibility, etc. ... Caroline Obeid. Project Manager, Cultural Facilities Planning. 613-580-2424 ext. 24387 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: brend176
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Rationales, Prioritization, and Building the Business Case


1
Rationales, Prioritization, and Building the
Business Case
  • Making Space for Culture Planning Cultural
    Infrastructure
  • CECC Pre-conference
  • October 18, 2006

2
Ottawa Facility Needs
  • The 20/20 Arts Heritage Plan indicated that
  • 91 of existing local arts facilities are at
    capacity
  • All existing local venues require
  • renovations to their aging spaces
  • upgrading to meet minimum safety and design
    standards, accessibility, etc.
  • increased space to accommodate existing activity
  • greater support space
  • Most existing local facilities are not purpose
    built

3
Current Needs
  • To address needs of past 25 years
  • For example
  • Concert Hall
  • Relocation and expansion of Archives
  • Orleans Theatre
  • Redevelopment of Arts Court
  • Expansion of the Ottawa Art Gallery
  • Artists Live Work Space
  • Heritage Gateway
  • Preservation Centre
  • Within LRFP (2007-2017)

4
Facility Development Process
  • Phase 1 Strategic Planning
  • Cultural Infrastructure Strategy
  • Departmental Priorities
  • Corporate Plan
  • Growth Management Plans
  • Long Range Financial Plan

5
Future Needs
  • Every 10 yrs
  • Survey community needs
  • Analyze population growth / density / diversity,
    etc.
  • Acquire initial list of cultural facility needs

6
Validation of New Projects
  • Service Delivery
  • Project fits within Cultural Services Service
    Delivery
  • Model and fulfills an identified need
  • Principles
  • Project meets development principles

7
Principles
  • Ensure that a network of cultural facilities and
    spaces support a continuum of arts and heritage
    activities so that residents can participate.
  • Ensure cultural activities are accommodated as
    part of all new multi-use community complexes.
  • Ensure that new development does not duplicate
    existing programs and services.
  • Support community initiated projects where such
    projects address a recognized service gap, and
    are supported by a sustainable business plan that
    addresses not only capital and operating costs
    but also the costs of life-cycle replacement as
    the asset ages.
  • Ensure flexibility to respond to emerging needs
    and opportunities.

8
Principles
  • Protect archaeological and built heritage
    resources.
  • Give priority to the adaptive re-use of
    City-owned heritage buildings before constructing
    or leasing new buildings.
  • Recognize different needs of urban, suburban, and
    rural communities as well as bilingual and
    culturally diverse communities and ensure the
    provision of facilities/services to underserved
    and/or isolated communities.
  • Build and develop all new arts facilities based
    on principles of environmental and social
    sustainability, health and safety,
    physical/natural development, economic/social
    development, quality of life/living standards,
    risk management and reducing life cycle costs.

9
Facility Development Process
  • Phase 2 Business Case Development
  • Phase 3 Design Development
  • Phase 4 Construction
  • Phase 5 Occupancy / Operation
  • Phase 6 Life-Cycle

10
Prioritization Criteria
  • Projects in different stages of development
  • Re-prioritize needs annually
  • MUSTS
  •    Legislation / Council Directed
  •    Health Safety
  •    Committed Funding / Funding Opportunities
  • WANTS
  • C1. Partner Impact Project increases
    accessibility, and offers unique
    programs/services to
  • cultural community stakeholders
  •          high 5 pts
  •          medium 3 pts
  •          low
    1 pt

11
Prioritization Criteria
C2. Community Access Project increases
accessibility, and offers unique
programs/services for community
participation          high 5 pts         
medium 3 pts          low 1 pt C3. Level
of Partnerships Project has support of those
partners who can bring value to the
project          Partners and sponsors
actively participate in the project
development 5 pts          Support from key
stakeholders 3 pts          Scope of
projects has been explored/discussed with
stakeholders 1 pt C4. Alignment with Corporate
Priorities          Corporate priority
5 pts         
Departmental priority
3 pts          Legacy project
1 pt
12
Prioritization Criteria
  • C5. Human Resource Capacity Project has
    resources to carry on deliverables and milestones
  •          HR totally assigned 5 pts
  •          HR partially assigned 3 pts
  •          No HR assigned 0 pt
  • C6. Project Development Status Project
    requirements are defined and approved by senior
    management
  •          Strategic Planning 1 pt
  •          Business Case 2 pts
  •          Design Development 3 pts
  •          Construction 4 pts

13
Prioritization Criteria for Life-Cycle
  • City of Ottawa, Corporate Asset Management
  • Mandatory
  • Funding opportunities
  • Health Safety
  • Legislative / Legal
  • Discretionary
  • Impact on Asset Integrity
  • Impact on Program Integrity and Delivery
  • Financial Considerations (Total value of project)
  • Timing and Implementation Considerations
  • Satisfaction and Community Interest / Impact

14
Importance of Prioritization
  • Need a transparent process
  • Requirement to annually set 10 yr financial
    forecast
  • Many competing needs
  • Need a coordinated approach with partners
  • Need to ensure effective / efficient use of
    resources

15
Challenges
  • Prioritization based on one moment in time
  • Projects at different stages of development
  • Timing of project is dependent on many factors
  • Limited human and financial resources
  • Emerging opportunities
  • Community vs. City initiatives
  • Funding not committed for multi-year planning
  • Political agendas

16
(No Transcript)
17
Validating the Decision Making Model
  • Filters
  • City or Community Initiated Projects
  • Planned versus Opportunity
  • Integrating Cultural and Corporate Priorities
  • Linking to Corporate Initiatives
  • Provincial and Federal Perspectives
  • Ottawa's Creative Direction

18
  • Prepared by the City of OttawaFor more
    information contactCaroline ObeidProject
    Manager, Cultural Facilities Planning613-580-2424
    ext. 24387Caroline.Obeid_at_ottawa.ca
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com