Title: Climate Change or Social Change
1Climate Change or Social Change?
2The fact of climate change
- A wide consensus among climate scientists
- The sceptics
- Populists or scientists from other fields who do
not write to peer reviewed scientific journals - Exxon etc. have been financing this
- There is politics also in climate sciences but it
has not so much influence on the main tenets - instead on the publication of results and on
practical recommendations
3What has already happened?
- Average temperature has risen about 1oC from
pre-industrial level - Average sea-level has risen more than 17 cm since
the year 1900 more floods - Mountain glaciers are disappearing rapidly
4Recent observation
- The ice sheets in Greenland and the Antarctic
melt and break off much faster than expected - The Arctic sea ice is diminishing up to 30 years
ahead of IPCC forecasts - The melting of Arctic permafrost has started.
- Canadian forests have changed from a carbon sink
to a CO2 source - The Amazon is drying rapidly
5The melting of the ice sheet in Greenland has
accelerated
1992
2002
6If no action ...
- The upper limit of global warming is not tens of
degrees but hundreds of degrees - Total catastrophe for humanity, animals and plants
Venus surface temperature 460oC
7Needed emission cuts
- The IPCC -85 by the year 2050
- gt at least -95 in the Global North
- Many recent research reports The climate is much
more sensitive than the IPCC assumed in May 2006
(the report deadline) - The information on the atmospheric concentrations
in the ancient warm periods - Many recent observations which are not included
in the IPCC models - gt the emissions must be reduced even more rapidly
8The present CO2 concentration too high
- In fact the present CO2 concentration of 385 ppm
is too much, should be 350 ppm - gt emission rapidly to zero and a lot of CO2 be
bound in biomass
9Only little time left
- James Hansen etc. less than 10 years
- Otherwise self-perpetuating climate change starts
- Positive feed-back
- We cannot control it
10Mainstream solutions, part 1incentives
- Publicity
- Creating carbon markets
- State regulation (taxes etc.)
11Mainstream solutions, part 2technical fixes
- capturing CO2 from the coal power plants
- Planting trees
- Nuclear power
- Renewable energy sources
- raising the efficiency of energy use
12My thesismainstream solutions don't work
- The record in the mitigation efforts up to now is
dismal
- Global carbon dioxide emissions grew more than 3
per year 2000-2004, more than ever - Most of the signatories of the Kyoto Protocol
have increased their emissions.
13The limits of publicity
- Publicity against climate change minimal compared
to the PR for behaviour causing it - Advertisements and other incentives to consume
essential for growth and capitalism
14The limits of carbon market
- New markets, old problems
- Market ideal gtlt the reality of capitalism
- In order to get markets running, the idea of
reality must be simplified - You have to create firm knowledge even though you
in reality have only guesses - Corner House, Larry Lohman
- www.thecornerhouse.org.uk
15The limits in state regulation
- In principle, but...
- Information overload in centralized social
structures - State-Capital nexus in formulating the regulations
- In execution of regulations Revolving door
- Jänicke, Martin State Failure/Staatsversagen
16The technical limit of technical fixes
- Many proposed technical fixes probably won't
succeed at all - e.g. carbon capture
- No energy source in the official economy is green
house gas free at present - At least in their construction phase large
emissions - especially nuclear power and most biomass sources
17The inertia of technological system
- Enormous investments in the present system
- To replace it means enormous efforts, giant
investments and millions of professionals and
skilled workers - If we had time to wait until the present one
wears out, there would be no problem - But we do not have such time
- Not enough skilled workers and raw materials to
be mobilized quickly enough
18The net emission reduction comes too late
- The construction of a new energy system would
absorb so much energy that we would have to wait
net energy for decades - e.g. one nuclear power plant/month gt net energy
not until after 33 years (a conservative
estimate, probably even later) - A rapid technical transition program would
increase the CO2-emissions just at the most
critical period
19The social and political limits of technical fix
program
- Insofar as technical fixes would be successful,
the oil and coal corporations would lose money
and influence gt enormous resistance - Retardation
- Turning the program to a direction that is safe
to corporations but endangers the environment
20The general freezing of economy when energy costs
are rising
- The Stern review and the report of the IPCC's
3. working group maintain otherwise - They are misleading
- They are not based on the latest climate science
- Their starting points are scenarios which are
very risky already on the bases of the then
available science - Stern chose 550 ppm greenhouse gas concentration
- gt 50 chance that temperature rise is gt 3 oC
- 10 chance that temperature rise is gt 5 oC
21Hopeless situation?
- For many the only hope is geoengineering
- changing the physical characteristics of the
planet Earth - Many of these are very dangerous
- for example spreading a large amount of sulphates
into the atmosphere
22Solution cutting down production and consumption
rapidly
- ending non-essential production
- reducing institutional consumption
- Decreasing individual consumption of the global
upper and middle class. - A historical example the collapse of the USSR
- stumbling block Growth imperative
- This obstacle curtails advances in renewable
energy sources and energy conservation - The same applies also to publicity and state
regulation
23Why is economic growth so important?
- Reflects the growth of the capital of
corporations the essence of capitalism - The threat of social chaos
- The risk of structural social change
- Growth consumer society
- The current way of ruling
- The present depression
- Social instability grows
- The depression in the 1930's the same story
24To give up growth aspirations gt to change the
social system
- e.g. to a new openly authoritarian system
- Although the elite would have more direct power,
most members of the elite don't like this
- More uncomfortable to be in the top position
hate and insecurity every where - More difficult to govern, to suppress passive and
active resistance when there are no legitimacy of
formal democracy
25Transition to a real democracy
- Post-growth and post-capitalist society could as
well or even more probably more towards genuine
and deep democracy - Democracy has been the main legitimating ideology
of the present largely non-democratic system - Partly therefore people have commonly embraced
democratic values - Democracy is most natural social system found
also among social animals
26Why anti-growth and system change perspective is
commonly rejected even among left-green?
- The hopelessness of the other options and the
desperate state of affairs are not realized - The same fear as among the elite but reversed
- The sectarian and narrow-minded atmosphere among
openly revolutionary left - Certain interpretations of history and the
present - The relationship between the present economy and
satisfaction - The present-day social structures and how people
are attached to them - The relationship between capitalism and wealth
- The historical democratic revolutions and their
failure
27Another interpretation
- Consumer society is based on organized creation
of dissatisfaction - Social structures are not like machines but
rather provisionally frozen front lines in an
on-going struggle - Another non-capitalist parallel society already
exists based on common wealth and non-monetary
relationships - Revolutionary movements created democratic
structures which broke up more because of outside
than inside forces
28Dissatisfying consumption
- Hundreds of studies consuming more does not make
people more satisfied or happier - In advertisement in popular culture commodities
are made into symbols of most varied things - Commodities are bought because of their social,
cultural and spiritual meanings and connotations - But usually they do not satisfy social, cultural
and spiritual needs - As far as they do satisfy, they do it only for a
short while - Soon meanings are moved by advertisements from
old things to new ones. Yet you cannot buy the
new ones at once or perhaps ever.
29Real existing alternative
- Underneath and parallel to the official
structures and roles, there is another world of
thought, activity and social relations
- E.g. when their children are small, parents
produce an enormous amount of food, cleaning,
care and other essential services unpaid at their
home. - Usually the only thing preventing them from
breaking down under the workload is the help
given by informal circles of friends, relatives,
neighbours and peers.
30Common wealth
- Material common wealth the air that we breathe,
the sun that warms us, the winds that cool us,
the very climate we try to save, the ability of
most women to give birth, wild animals and
plants, rivers and most lakes, oceans, deserts
and a large part of the forested areas, cities
and villages, public libraries, schools,hospitals
and cheap public transportation systems
- Non-material examples are most of the genetic
information and scientific knowledge, open-source
software like Linux, local knowledge, folk wisdom
and common sense, folklore and a large part of
popular and high culture
31Social and subjective 'surplus'
- Humans are only partially attached to capitalism
- There exist enormous social and subjective
'surplus' - It explains rapid social changes in history
- Its can orientate social movements and give hope
for future