Title: Trends in AfricanAmerican Marriage Patterns
1What is migration?
- Do you have to cross international borders?
- Do you have to cross any border at all?
- Does it matter how long you stay at your
destination? - If you move to a new house, are you definitely a
migrant? - Can you be a migrant without changing jobs?
- MIGRATION is not the same as MOBILITY
2A loose definition of migration, with four key
patterns identified
Definitive
Social break
Minimal
Low
High
Distance moved
3But does any of this matter?
- MAYBE NOT!
- Precise definitions are often irrelevant
because - Were always limited by the data itself
- We usually know about people who cross an
administrative boundary - We usually know very little about social
integration - We usually know very little about duration of
stay
4Example of identifying migrants to the U.S.
- Distance moved
- country of birth
- Duration of time spent in the U.S.
- Exact number of years in 1900-1920 and 1970-2000
census - Can make inferences based on childrens
birthplaces in other years - Social integration
- Can make inferences based on
- Ethnic intermarriage
- Naming patterns (some years)
- Language spoke at home (some years)
- Residential isolation at the destination
5Example of identifying migrants within the U.S.
- Distance moved
- State of birth and current state of residence
- Duration of time spent at the destination
- No knowledge prior to 1940
- Can identify those who moved gt5 lt5 years ago in
1940-2000 - Social integration
- Can make inferences based on
- intermarriage with similar migrants
- residential isolation in the city
6Even keeping things simple can get messy
The most common definition of a migrant
is someone who has moved since being
born Presents a problem for comparing
populations A population with lots of children
will have few migrants Children just havent had
that long to move
7Figure 1. Percent of Native Population Residing
Outside State of
Birth by Race, United States, 1850-1990
40
35
30
White
25
Percent Migrant
20
Black
15
10
5
0
1850
1860
1870
1880
1890
1900
1910
1920
1930
1940
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
Census Year
8(No Transcript)
9So the big definition doesnt matter?
- ACTUALLY MAYBE IT DOES
- Precise definitions developed to address
earlier beliefs that - Migration was only barely existent prior to
industrialization - Rural to urban migrants were grist in the mill
of industrialization - Migration was permanent and devastating for them
- Migration goes hand-in-hand with nation-building
- Migrants were poor huddled masses
- Undifferentiated and unprepared foreigners
10A definition of migration, with four key patterns
identified
Definitive
Social break
Minimal
Low
High
Distance moved
11New emphases in study of migration
- Migration has always been a part of U.S. and
European life - Migrants tend to be positively selected
- Migrants often plan to return home
- even among migrants to the U.S.
- affects their attitudes towards the destination
point - Assimilation is not a given
- Migration as a process to be understood in its
own right -
12Brief history of immigration to the U.S.
13Common images of migration
-
- ...Give me your tired, your poor,
- Your huddled masses yearning to be free,
- The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
- Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me
- I lift my lamp beside the golden door!
- The New Colossus (1886)
- Emma Lazarus
14Common images of migration
Jacob Riis, 5 Cents Lodging, 1890
15Common images of migration
Lewis Hine, New York City Tenement, 1910
16Common images of migration
Graduation ceremony from Ford plants
orientation program, 1920s
17Issues that complicate these portraits
- Many early 1900s migrants returned home
- South Italians, Croats, Slovenians, Slovaks,
Hungarians 50-60 - North Italians, Poles 30-50
- Finns, Serbs, Bulgarians 20-30
- Germans, Scandinavians, English 10-20
- Irish, Hebrews lt10
- Large numbers of Europeans went instead to...
- Brazil and Argentina about 1 for every 4 who
came to the U.S. - Canada about 1 for every 5 who came to the U.S.
- Towns and cities all across Europe many more
than came to U.S. - The U.S. was one destination in a complex
migration system
18Issues that complicate these portraits
- Most were doing pretty well before leaving
- Migration is usually a selective process
- Traveling long distances costs money
- Families send their most promising members
- Education and experience with migration seems to
make people more inclined to move - Many avoided assimilation quite successfully
- People planned to make a little money and return
home - People lived here in perfectly happy ethnic
isolation
19(No Transcript)
20(No Transcript)
21Relevant immigration laws
- Chinese Exclusion Act, 1882 (made permanent 1902)
- Gentlemans Agreement with Japan, 1908
- National Origins Act of 1924
- Established a tight quota system
- Based on origins of the US population in 1890
- Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1965
- Larger quotas for Asian and African countries
- Family reunification privileged
- Particular professions priviledged
22Main periods in US Immigration
"Old immigration" Origins German,
Scandinavian, and Scotch-Irish 1820s-1880s Desti
nations Midwest rural and urban, Upper
MW Type of work farm, some
urban Traveling alone mostly
families Religion Protestant "New
Immigration" Origins Italian, Greek, Polish,
Russian 1880s-1920s Destinations Urban
northeast and mid-Atlantic Type of work
urban factory work Traveling alone yes,
mostly Religion more Catholic,
Jewish Really new Immigration" Origins
Latin America, Asia, Africa 1960s-2000s Destinat
ions Florida, Texas, California,
cities Type of work professions and
clerical Traveling alone mixed Religion
Catholic, Protestant, Muslim
23(No Transcript)
24Brief history of migration within the U.S.
25Figure 1. Percent of Native Population Residing
Outside State of
Birth by Race, United States, 1850-1990
40
35
30
White
25
Percent Migrant
20
Black
15
10
5
0
1850
1860
1870
1880
1890
1900
1910
1920
1930
1940
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
Census Year
26(No Transcript)
27(No Transcript)
28Something Im working on.....
29(No Transcript)
30Southern out-migrants as a proportion of all
southern-born persons, by race
Data not available for 1890 and 1930. Source
Integrated Public Use Microdata Series files
(IPUMS), 1870-1970.
31Source IPUMS file, 1870
32Source IPUMS file, 1900
33Source IPUMS file, 1920
34Source IPUMS file, 1950
35Source IPUMS 1980 5 State file, Sample A
36How did these folks do in the North?
37Map 1 Two definitions of Appalachia Appalachian
Regional Commission and Southern Appalachian
Studies group
38Map 2 SAS definition of Appalachia Using 1940
State Economic Areas and 1980 County Groups
39Map 3 ARC definition of Appalachia Using 1940
State Economic Areas and 1980 County Groups
40Map 4 Key areas of northward out-migration and
economic distress in Appalachia
41Average wage incomes of recent Southern and
Foreign-born men aged 25-60 in the East North
Central region, 1980
Source IPUMS, 1980 5 State file, Sample A.
42Percent of recent migrant households in poverty,
East North Central region, 1980
Source IPUMS, 1980 5 State file, Sample A.
43(No Transcript)
44(No Transcript)
45(No Transcript)