Title: Electricity transmission pricing: getting the prices good enough
1Electricity transmission pricing getting the
prices good enough?
- Richard Green
- Institute for Energy Research and Policy
2Transmission pricing
- Geographical differentiation in the wholesale
market - Prices for connecting to and using the
transmission network
3Six objectives
- Promote the efficient day-to-day operation of the
bulk power market - Signal locational advantages for investment in
generation and demand - Signal the need for investment in the
transmission system
4Six objectives
- Compensate the owners of existing transmission
assets - Be simple and transparent
- Be politically implementable
- Green (Utilities Policy, 1997)
5Three approaches
- Ignore transmission issues
- Ignore transmission issues, then bribe market
participants to sort things out - Integrate transmission issues into your market
design(s)
6Major power flows
Source UCTE
7Major power flows and congestion
Congested 26-75 76-99 100
Source UCTE
8If costs differ between areas
P
P
GW
GW
Xpts
9If costs differ between areas
P
P
GW
GW
Xpts
Mpts
10If costs differ between areas
and the lines are too thin
P
P
GW
GW
Xpts
Mpts
11If costs differ between areas
and the lines are too thin
P
P
T
GW
GW
Xpts
Mpts
12If costs differ between areas
and the lines are too thin
you could still ignore the problem
P
P
GW
GW
Xpts
Mpts
but someone will want money to sort it out!
13Zones in the NEM
- NEM runs nodal model and dispatches according to
nodal conditions (prices) - Generators / loads grouped into regions
- All generators in a region receive the regional
reference price - Marginal cost at a reference node
- No compensation for constrained running
14From a line to a network
- Electricity will flow along every path between
two nodes - It cannot be steered
- If one line fails, the flows instantly change
- Overloading any line can be catastrophic
15(for example)
16The impact of loop flows
A
B
C
17The impact of loop flows
A
B
C
18Nodal prices
- Set price of power equal to marginal cost at each
point (node) on the network - Marginal cost of generation (if variable)
- MC of bringing in power from elsewhere
- Centralised market uses the nodal prices
- Bilateral trades which move power pay the
difference in nodal prices
19Nodal trading
- Price at A 20, Price at B 30
- I sell at A, I receive 20
- I sell at B, I receive 30
- I generate at A and sell at B, I receive the
agreed bilateral price and pay (30 20) - I generate at B and sell at A, I receive the
agreed bilateral price and pay (20 30)
B
A
20The impact of loop flows
and constraints
A
B
6 MW at C needs 3 MW from A and 3 MW from B
C
21Prices constraint AB
- Price at C (Pa Pb)/2
- 1 MW extra capacity allows 1.5 MW from A to
replace 1.5 MW from B - Shadow cost of constraint 1.5 (Pb Pa)
- If Pa 10, Pb 30
- Pc 20, shadow cost 30
- Pc Pa 1/3 shadow cost Pb 1/3 shadow
cost
22The impact of loop flows
and constraints
3 MW at C needs 3 MW from A
and 6 MW from B
23Prices constraint AC
- Price at C 2Pb Pa
- 1 MW extra capacity allows 3 MW from A to replace
3 MW from B - Shadow cost of constraint 3 (Pb Pa)
- If Pa 10, Pb 30
- Pc 50, shadow cost 60
- Pc Pa 2/3 Shadow cost
- Pb 1/3 Shadow cost
24The impact of loop flows
and constraints
3 MW at C needs 6 MW from A
and 3 MW from B
25Prices constraint CB
- Price at C 2 Pa Pb
- 1 MW extra capacity allows 3 MW from A to replace
3 MW from B - Shadow cost of constraint 3 (Pb Pa)
- If Pa 10, Pb 30
- Pc 10, shadow cost 60
- Pc Pa 1/3 shadow cost Pb 2/3 shadow
cost
26Summary
27Implications
- Nodal prices can vary significantly
- Over time
- Over space
- The first creates a need for hedging
- The second makes it harder
- The prices may be counter-intuitive
28How to hedge
- Transmission Congestion Contract
- Spatial contract for differences
- Pays the holder the difference in nodal prices
between two specified points (from A to B) - Price at B Price at A
- Perfect hedge if you generate that amount of
power at A and sell it at B - Remember the real-time charge is (PB PA)
29Whod sell that hedge?
- The spot market charges raise a surplus
- Who gets it?
- If the Transmission Congestion Contracts
allocation is feasible, Hogan (1992) shows spot
market surplus TCC payments - Organisation receiving the spot surplus can issue
TCCs and find itself hedged!
30Inferior ways of hedging
- Financial Transmission Rights (options)
- Only pay out when value is positive
- Payments may exceed spot revenues
- Physical Transmission Rights
- Limited by system capacity
- If line limit on AB is 100, can only issue 100
- With TCCs, 100 BA allows an extra 100 AB
- Smeared share of congestion revenues
31What if you get it wrong?
- Operational difficulties
- PJMs first market
- Economic operating mistakes
- Investment mistakes
- At present, we dont know much about these
32How much does it cost to get it wrong?
- Compare demand and operating patterns with
different pricing rules - Model applied to England and Wales, 1996 data
- Numbers are country- and time-specific
- Approach is general
33The model
- NGC system in 1996/97
- Thirteen zones (two pairs of NGCs zones are
combined, one zone split into two) - Iso-elastic demand in every zone
- Generation in most
/MWh
Gas, Coal, Nuclear Oil
GW
34Transmission system model
North
A DC load flow model with losses (proportional to
the square of flows) and constraints on the total
flows across NGCs system boundaries
South-West
35Three pricing rules
- One price for generation and for demand in each
zone (optimal) - One price at each node for generation, but a
common national price for demand - One national price for generation and one
national price for demand (actual system) - Constraints are managed via payments for
constrained-on and constrained-off running
36What is welfare?
- NGCs operating surplus
- Kept the same under each of the rules
- Generators operating surpluses
- Energy revenues less variable fuel costs
- Gas contracts assumed not to be variable
- Consumer surplus
- Area under their demand curve and above the price
they actually pay
37Prices winter peak
38Prices summer trough
39Basic results
40Intuition for the results
- Adjustments to generation for constraints have to
happen, whatever the pricing rule - Here, these are in the same direction as the
economic response to marginal losses - Cost differences at stations partially offset
marginal transmission losses
41Market power
- Sometimes a problem in this market
- General incentive to raise prices
- Particular incentive to raise prices in
import-constrained area - Uniform pricing gives incentive to reduce prices
in export-constrained area - Model two strategic generators plus fringe
- Both firms change slope of bids (by region)
42Generators capacities
North
South-West
43Prices winter peak
44Prices summer trough
45Prices zone 12
46Prices zone 1
47Market power
48Conclusions of this study
- Optimal pricing would create winners (northern
consumers, southern generators) and losers
(northern generators, southern consumers) - It would be less vulnerable to market power
- Welfare gains of 1 of turnover are quite large
as Harberger triangles go!
49Other transmission charges
- Connection assets local costs
- Capacity-based use of system
- Affect investment decision, not operating choices
- Output-based use of system
- Affect operating choices and might be used to
offset consistent errors in the market rules - Contracts for constrained running
50Interactions between charges
- Investing generators should consider both spot
market and transmission charges - With the right spot signals, transmission charges
should be uniform - Differentiated transmission charges needed if
spot prices send inadequate signals - Using both would over-signal, reducing
transmission costs, but raising generators
51Conclusion
- For major changes, transmission charging creates
well-informed winners and losers - Gains typically small relative to transfers
- With good operators, the system is resilient to
poor rules - Better rules will create gains worth having
52(No Transcript)