Electricity transmission pricing: getting the prices good enough - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 52
About This Presentation
Title:

Electricity transmission pricing: getting the prices good enough

Description:

1 MW extra capacity allows 3 MW from A to replace 3 MW from B ... If line limit on AB is 100, can only issue 100. With TCCs, 100 BA 'allows' an extra 100 AB ' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:105
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 53
Provided by: Rich328
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Electricity transmission pricing: getting the prices good enough


1
Electricity transmission pricing getting the
prices good enough?
  • Richard Green
  • Institute for Energy Research and Policy

2
Transmission pricing
  • Geographical differentiation in the wholesale
    market
  • Prices for connecting to and using the
    transmission network

3
Six objectives
  • Promote the efficient day-to-day operation of the
    bulk power market
  • Signal locational advantages for investment in
    generation and demand
  • Signal the need for investment in the
    transmission system

4
Six objectives
  • Compensate the owners of existing transmission
    assets
  • Be simple and transparent
  • Be politically implementable
  • Green (Utilities Policy, 1997)

5
Three approaches
  • Ignore transmission issues
  • Ignore transmission issues, then bribe market
    participants to sort things out
  • Integrate transmission issues into your market
    design(s)

6
Major power flows
Source UCTE
7
Major power flows and congestion
Congested 26-75 76-99 100
Source UCTE
8
If costs differ between areas
P
P
GW
GW
Xpts
9
If costs differ between areas
P
P
GW
GW
Xpts
Mpts
10
If costs differ between areas
and the lines are too thin
P
P
GW
GW
Xpts
Mpts
11
If costs differ between areas
and the lines are too thin
P
P
T
GW
GW
Xpts
Mpts
12
If costs differ between areas
and the lines are too thin
you could still ignore the problem
P
P
GW
GW
Xpts
Mpts
but someone will want money to sort it out!
13
Zones in the NEM
  • NEM runs nodal model and dispatches according to
    nodal conditions (prices)
  • Generators / loads grouped into regions
  • All generators in a region receive the regional
    reference price
  • Marginal cost at a reference node
  • No compensation for constrained running

14
From a line to a network
  • Electricity will flow along every path between
    two nodes
  • It cannot be steered
  • If one line fails, the flows instantly change
  • Overloading any line can be catastrophic

15
(for example)
16
The impact of loop flows
A
B
C
17
The impact of loop flows
A
B
C
18
Nodal prices
  • Set price of power equal to marginal cost at each
    point (node) on the network
  • Marginal cost of generation (if variable)
  • MC of bringing in power from elsewhere
  • Centralised market uses the nodal prices
  • Bilateral trades which move power pay the
    difference in nodal prices

19
Nodal trading
  • Price at A 20, Price at B 30
  • I sell at A, I receive 20
  • I sell at B, I receive 30
  • I generate at A and sell at B, I receive the
    agreed bilateral price and pay (30 20)
  • I generate at B and sell at A, I receive the
    agreed bilateral price and pay (20 30)

B
A
20
The impact of loop flows
and constraints
A
B
6 MW at C needs 3 MW from A and 3 MW from B
C
21
Prices constraint AB
  • Price at C (Pa Pb)/2
  • 1 MW extra capacity allows 1.5 MW from A to
    replace 1.5 MW from B
  • Shadow cost of constraint 1.5 (Pb Pa)
  • If Pa 10, Pb 30
  • Pc 20, shadow cost 30
  • Pc Pa 1/3 shadow cost Pb 1/3 shadow
    cost

22
The impact of loop flows
and constraints
3 MW at C needs 3 MW from A
and 6 MW from B
23
Prices constraint AC
  • Price at C 2Pb Pa
  • 1 MW extra capacity allows 3 MW from A to replace
    3 MW from B
  • Shadow cost of constraint 3 (Pb Pa)
  • If Pa 10, Pb 30
  • Pc 50, shadow cost 60
  • Pc Pa 2/3 Shadow cost
  • Pb 1/3 Shadow cost

24
The impact of loop flows
and constraints
3 MW at C needs 6 MW from A
and 3 MW from B
25
Prices constraint CB
  • Price at C 2 Pa Pb
  • 1 MW extra capacity allows 3 MW from A to replace
    3 MW from B
  • Shadow cost of constraint 3 (Pb Pa)
  • If Pa 10, Pb 30
  • Pc 10, shadow cost 60
  • Pc Pa 1/3 shadow cost Pb 2/3 shadow
    cost

26
Summary
27
Implications
  • Nodal prices can vary significantly
  • Over time
  • Over space
  • The first creates a need for hedging
  • The second makes it harder
  • The prices may be counter-intuitive

28
How to hedge
  • Transmission Congestion Contract
  • Spatial contract for differences
  • Pays the holder the difference in nodal prices
    between two specified points (from A to B)
  • Price at B Price at A
  • Perfect hedge if you generate that amount of
    power at A and sell it at B
  • Remember the real-time charge is (PB PA)

29
Whod sell that hedge?
  • The spot market charges raise a surplus
  • Who gets it?
  • If the Transmission Congestion Contracts
    allocation is feasible, Hogan (1992) shows spot
    market surplus TCC payments
  • Organisation receiving the spot surplus can issue
    TCCs and find itself hedged!

30
Inferior ways of hedging
  • Financial Transmission Rights (options)
  • Only pay out when value is positive
  • Payments may exceed spot revenues
  • Physical Transmission Rights
  • Limited by system capacity
  • If line limit on AB is 100, can only issue 100
  • With TCCs, 100 BA allows an extra 100 AB
  • Smeared share of congestion revenues

31
What if you get it wrong?
  • Operational difficulties
  • PJMs first market
  • Economic operating mistakes
  • Investment mistakes
  • At present, we dont know much about these

32
How much does it cost to get it wrong?
  • Compare demand and operating patterns with
    different pricing rules
  • Model applied to England and Wales, 1996 data
  • Numbers are country- and time-specific
  • Approach is general

33
The model
  • NGC system in 1996/97
  • Thirteen zones (two pairs of NGCs zones are
    combined, one zone split into two)
  • Iso-elastic demand in every zone
  • Generation in most

/MWh
Gas, Coal, Nuclear Oil
GW
34
Transmission system model
North
A DC load flow model with losses (proportional to
the square of flows) and constraints on the total
flows across NGCs system boundaries
South-West
35
Three pricing rules
  • One price for generation and for demand in each
    zone (optimal)
  • One price at each node for generation, but a
    common national price for demand
  • One national price for generation and one
    national price for demand (actual system)
  • Constraints are managed via payments for
    constrained-on and constrained-off running

36
What is welfare?
  • NGCs operating surplus
  • Kept the same under each of the rules
  • Generators operating surpluses
  • Energy revenues less variable fuel costs
  • Gas contracts assumed not to be variable
  • Consumer surplus
  • Area under their demand curve and above the price
    they actually pay

37
Prices winter peak
38
Prices summer trough
39
Basic results
40
Intuition for the results
  • Adjustments to generation for constraints have to
    happen, whatever the pricing rule
  • Here, these are in the same direction as the
    economic response to marginal losses
  • Cost differences at stations partially offset
    marginal transmission losses

41
Market power
  • Sometimes a problem in this market
  • General incentive to raise prices
  • Particular incentive to raise prices in
    import-constrained area
  • Uniform pricing gives incentive to reduce prices
    in export-constrained area
  • Model two strategic generators plus fringe
  • Both firms change slope of bids (by region)

42
Generators capacities
North
South-West
43
Prices winter peak
44
Prices summer trough
45
Prices zone 12
46
Prices zone 1
47
Market power
48
Conclusions of this study
  • Optimal pricing would create winners (northern
    consumers, southern generators) and losers
    (northern generators, southern consumers)
  • It would be less vulnerable to market power
  • Welfare gains of 1 of turnover are quite large
    as Harberger triangles go!

49
Other transmission charges
  • Connection assets local costs
  • Capacity-based use of system
  • Affect investment decision, not operating choices
  • Output-based use of system
  • Affect operating choices and might be used to
    offset consistent errors in the market rules
  • Contracts for constrained running

50
Interactions between charges
  • Investing generators should consider both spot
    market and transmission charges
  • With the right spot signals, transmission charges
    should be uniform
  • Differentiated transmission charges needed if
    spot prices send inadequate signals
  • Using both would over-signal, reducing
    transmission costs, but raising generators

51
Conclusion
  • For major changes, transmission charging creates
    well-informed winners and losers
  • Gains typically small relative to transfers
  • With good operators, the system is resilient to
    poor rules
  • Better rules will create gains worth having

52
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com