ECO 365 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

ECO 365

Description:

Partnership two or more owners. Corporation firm is a ... Factors of Production (Inputs) 3 Types. Variable inputs ... Weak Axiom of Profit ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:331
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: reedo
Category:
Tags: eco | axiom

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ECO 365


1
ECO 365 Intermediate Microeconomics
  • Lecture Notes

2
Profit Maximization
  • Profits (p) TR TC or
  • p SPiYi - S wjXj for i 1 to n (outputs) and
    j 1 to m (inputs).
  • Types of Firms
  • Proprietorship single owner
  • Partnership two or more owners
  • Corporation firm is a separate legal entity
  • Advantages and Disadvantages
  • Factors of Production (Inputs) 3 Types
  • Variable inputs varies with y.
  • Fixed inputs fixed even if y0.
  • Quasi-fixed inputs (if y0 then x0 but if ygt0
    then x is fixed).

3
  • Short-run p maximization
  • Assume only 1 output Y and two inputs L K
  • K is fixed gt in short-run
  • Firm problem is to choose L to maximize
  • Given that y f(K,L) gt choose L to max
  • How?
  • MPL w/p or pMPL w what does this mean?
  • Graphically
  • Recall p py wL rK, with K fixed or solve
    for y to get
  • y p/p wL/p rK/p
  • Recall that p, w, r, and K are all fixed
    paramters, if we also hold p constant then we get
    a straight line in L, y space

4
(No Transcript)
5
  • The curve in the graph above is called an
    iso-profit curve. Why?
  • Along a given iso-p then profit is fixed.
  • If profit ? (?) then the line shifts up (down).
  • Thus, have a family of curves, all with same
    slope where profit increases as you move and
    decreases as you move down.

6
Y
p?
L
L1
7
Y
L
8
  • Discuss the Graph above
  • Maximize profit by getting on highest iso-profit
    curve.
  • Subject to constraint that must be on the
    production function.
  • gt tangency between the two or
  • Slope of production function slope of
    iso-profit or
  • MPL w/p notice that this is the same
    condition as we already derived for profit
    maximization.
  • What happens as P or w change?
  • P ? or ? gt what happens to L and Y?
  • w ? or ? gt what happens to L and Y?
  • Show both graphically. Hint what happens to the
    slope of all isoprofit lines?

9
  • The Long-Run
  • Maximize profit pf(L,K) wL rK
  • Both L and K are variable and hence a more
    complex problem.
  • Recall that in the SR, profit max required MPL
    w/p
  • In LR is this still true?
  • Also requires that MPK r/p
  • or PMPK r PMPL w
  • Both conditions must occur simultaneously
  • Use these conditions to derive Factor Demand
    curves
  • L f(p, w, r) and K f(p, w, r)
  • Substitute these into production function to get
    optimal output Y f(L, K)

10
  • Inverse factor demand curves
  • w f(L, K, P) PMPL (L, K)
  • r f(L, K, P) PMPK (L, K)
  • or graphically why downward sloping?

DL
11
  • Returns to Scale
  • What happens to profit with constant returns to
    scale?
  • Inputs double gt costs double gt output doubles
    gt profits double but gt original output level
    was not profit max.
  • What happens with increasing returns to scale?
  • Problems
  • If original profit 0 gt 20 0 gt original
    profit may have been profit max.
  • Eventually get decreasing returns to scale gt
    what happens to profit?
  • If firm size increases (Y increases) gt under
    what conditions will P remain constant?
  • Even if market competitive gt if all firms
    increase Y gt P will increase.

12
  • Revealed Profitability
  • What is it?
  • Suppose at time t gt with pt , wt, rt then the
    firm chooses Yt, Lt, and Kt.
  • At a different time s gt with ps , ws, rs then
    the firm chooses Ys, Ls, and Ks.
  • Must be true that
  • (1) pt Yt - wt Lt - rt Kt pt Ys - wt Ls - rt Ks
    - why?
  • (2) ps Ys - ws Ls - rs Ks ps Yt - ws Lt - rs Kt
    - why?
  • WAPM Weak Axiom of Profit Maximization
  • To be p maximization point the p from actual
    choices must be p from other possible choices
    at that time.

13
  • Implications of WAPM?
  • Transform equation 2 to get
  • (3) -ps Yt ws Lt rs Kt -ps Ys ws Ls rs
    Ks
  • Now add equations 3 and 1 together to get
  • (pt ps)Yt (wt ws)Lt (rt rs)Kt (pt
    ps)Ys - (wt ws) Ls - (rt rs)Ks or
  • (pt ps)(Yt Ys ) (wt ws)(Lt - Ls) (rt
    rs)(Kt - Ks) 0
  • Or (4) ?p?Y ?w?L ?r?K 0
  • Suppose ?w ?r 0 gt equation 4 implies that
    ?p?Y 0 gt if ?p gt 0 then it must also be the
    case that ?Y gt 0. What does this mean?
  • Supply of the output is upward sloping

14
  • More implications of WAPM
  • Suppose ?p ?w 0 gt equation 4 implies that
  • ?r?K 0 or ?r?K 0 or if ?r 0 then it
    must be true that ?K 0. What does this mean?
  • Demand for Capital is downward sloping
  • Do the same thing to show demand for labor is
    also downward sloping.
  • Finally, note that profit maximization implies
    cost minimization (producing given Y with lowest
    costs). Why?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com