Title: Markets for Factor Inputs
1Chapter 14
- Markets for Factor Inputs
2Topics to be Discussed
- Competitive Factor Markets
- Equilibrium in a Competitive Factor Market
- Factor Markets with Monopsony Power
- Factor Markets with Monopoly Power
3Competitive Factor Markets
- Characteristics
- Large number of sellers of the factor of
production - Large number of buyers of the factor of
production - The buyers and sellers of the factor of
production are price takers
4Competitive Factor Markets
- Demand for a Factor Input When Only One Input Is
Variable - Factor demands are derived demand
- Demand for an input that depends on, and is
derived from, both the firms level of output and
the cost of inputs. - Demand for computer programmers derived from how
much software Microsoft expects to sell
5Factor Input Demand One Variable Input
- Assume firm produces output using two inputs
- Capital (K) and Labor (L)
- Hired at prices r (rental cost of capital) and
the w (wage rate) - K is fixed (short run analysis) and L is variable
- Firm must decide how much labor to hire
6Factor Input Demand One Variable Input
- How does a firm decide if its profitable to hire
another worker? - If the additional revenue from the output of
hiring another worker is greater than its cost - Marginal Revenue Product of Labor (MPRL)
- Additional revenue resulting from the sale of
output created by the use of one additional unit
of an input
7Factor Input Demand One Variable Input
- The incremental cost of a unit of labor is the
wage rate, w - Profitable to hire more labor if the MRPL is at
least as large as the wage rate, w - Must measure the MRPL
8Factor Input Demand One Variable Input
- MRPL is the additional output obtained from the
additional unit of labor, multiplied by the
additional revenue from an extra unit of output - Additional output is given by MPL and additional
revenue is MR
9Factor Input Demand One Variable Input
10Factor Input Demand One Variable Input
- In a competitive market MR P
- This means, for a competitive market
- Graphically, diminishing marginal returns, MPL
falls as L increases
11Marginal Revenue Product
Wages ( per hour)
Hours of Work
12Factor Input Demand One Variable Input
- Choosing the profit-maximizing amount of labor
- If MRPL gt w (the marginal cost of hiring a
worker) hire the worker - If MRPL lt w hire less labor
- If MRPL w profit maximizing amount of labor
13Hiring by a Firm in the Labor Market
In a competitive labor market, a firm faces a
perfectly elastic supply of labor and can hire as
many workers as it wants at w.
Price of Labor
The profit maximizing firm will hire L units of
labor at the point where the marginal revenue
product of labor is equal to the wage rate.
Quantity of Labor
14Factor Input Demand One Variable Input
- Quantity of labor demand changes in response to
the wage rate - If the market supply of labor increased relative
to demand (baby boomers or female entry), a
surplus of labor would exist and the wage rate
would fall.
15A Shift in the Supply of Labor
Price of Labor
Quantity of Labor
16Factor Input Demand One Variable Input
- Comparing Input and Output Markets
17Factor Input Demand One Variable Input
- Both the hiring and output choices of the firm
follow the same rule - Inputs or outputs are chosen so that marginal
revenue from the sale of output is equal to
marginal cost from the purchase of inputs - True for both competitive and noncompetitive
markets
18Factor Input Demand Many Inputs
- In choosing more than one variable input, a
change in the price of one input changes the
demand for the others. - Scenario
- Producing farm equipment with two variable
inputs - Labor
- Assembly-line machinery
19Factor Input Demand Many Inputs
- If the wage rate falls
- More labor will be demanded even if amount of
machinery does not change - MC of producing farm equipment falls
- Profitable for firm to increase output
- Will invest in additional machinery to expand
production - MRPL will shift right, quantity of labor demanded
increases
20Factor Input Demand Many Inputs
- If wage rate is 20/hr, firm hires 100 worker
hours point A - Wage rate falls to 15/hr
- MRPL gt W, form demands more labor
- MRPL1 is demand for labor w/machinery fixed
- Increased labor causes MPK to rise encouraging
the firm to rent more machinery - MPL increases
- MRPL curve shifts right, firm uses 140 hrs labor
21Factor Input Demand Many Inputs
When the wage rate falls to 15, the MRP curve
shifts, generating a new point C on the firms
demand for labor curve. Thus A and C are on the
demand for labor curve, but B is not.
22Market Demand Curve
- All firms demand for labor vary substantially
- Assume that all firms respond to a lower wage
- All firms would hire more workers.
- Market supply would increase.
- The market price will fall.
- The quantity demanded for labor by the firm will
be smaller.
23Industry Demand for Labor
Firm
Industry
Wage ( per hour)
Wage ( per hour)
15
15
10
10
5
5
0
0
50
100
150
L0
L2
120
L1
Labor (worker-hours)
Labor (worker-hours)
24The Industry Demand for Labor
- If wage rate falls for all firms in industry, all
firms will demand more labor - More industry output and supply for output will
rise causing price to fall - The increase in labor is smaller than if the
product price were fixed - Adding all labor demand curves in all industries
gives market demand curve for labor
25The Demand for Jet Fuel
- Jet fuel is a factor (input) for airlines
- Cost of jet fuel
- 1971 Jet fuel cost equaled 12.4 of total
operating cost - 1980 Jet fuel cost equaled 30.0 of total
operating cost - 1990s Jet fuel cost equaled 15.0 of total
operating cost
26The Demand for Jet Fuel
- Airlines responded to higher prices in the 1970s
by reducing the quantity of jet fuel used. - Output of airlines (ton-miles) increased by 29.6
jet fuel consumed rose by 8.8. - Effect of increased fuel costs on airlines
depends on ability to cut fuel usage by reducing
weight
27The Demand for Jet Fuel
- Price elasticity of demand for jet fuel depends
on ability to conserve fuel and elasticities of
demand and supply of travel - The demand for jet fuel impacts the airlines and
refineries alike - The short-run price elasticity of demand for
jet-fuel is very inelastic
28Short-run Price Elasticityof Demand for Jet Fuel
Airline Elasticity Airline Elasticity
- American -.06 Delta -.15
- Continental -.09 TWA -.10
- Northwest -.07 United -.10
29The Demand for Jet Fuel
- There is no good substitute for jet fuel
- Long run elasticity of demand is higher, however,
because airlines can eventually introduce more
energy-efficient airplanes - Can show short and long-run demands for jet fuel
- MRPSR is much less elastic than long run demand
since it takes time to substitute
30The Short- and Long-RunDemand for Jet Fuel
Price
Quantity of Jet Fuel
31The Supply of Inputs to a Firm
- In competitive market firm can purchase as much
of an input it wants at the market price - Determined by supply/demand of input market
- Input supply to a firm is perfectly elastic
- Firm small part of market so does not affect
market price
32A Firms Input Supply in a Competitive Factor
Market
Price ( per yard)
Price ( per yard)
Yards of Fabric (thousands)
Yards of Fabric (thousands)
33The Supply of Inputs to a Firm
- Remember that the supply curve is the average
expenditure curve - Supply curve representing the price per unit that
t firm pays for a good - Also, marginal expenditure curve represents the
firms expenditures on an additional unit that it
buys - Analogous to MR curve in output market
34The Supply of Inputs to a Firm
- When factor market is competitive, average
expenditure and marginal expenditure are
identical horizontal lines - How much of the input should the firm purchase?
- As long as MRP gt ME, profit can be increased by
buying more input - When MRP lt ME, benefits lower than costs
35The Supply of Inputs to a Firm
- Profit maximization required the marginal
expenditure to be equal to the marginal revenue
product - ME MRP
- A special case of competitive output market
showed profit maximization where - ME w
36The Market Supply of Inputs
- The market supply for factor inputs is upward
sloping - Examples jet fuel, fabric, steel
- The market supply for labor may be upward sloping
and backward bending
37The Supply of Inputs to a Firm
- The Supply of Labor
- The choice to supply labor is based on utility
maximization - Leisure competes with labor for utility
- Wage rate measures the price of leisure
- Higher wage rate causes the price of leisure to
increase
38The Market Supply of Inputs
- The Supply of Labor
- Higher wages encourage workers to substitute work
for leisure - The substitution effect
- Higher wages allow the worker to purchase more
goods, including leisure which reduces work hours
- The income effect
39Competitive Factor Markets
- The Supply of Labor
- If the income effect exceeds the substitution
effect the supply curve is backward bending - By using utility and budget line graph, we can
show how the supply curve can be backward bending - Can show how the income effect can exceed the
substitution effect
40Substitution and Income Effects of Wage Increase
- Worker initially chooses point A
- 16 hours leisure, 8 hour work
- Income 80
- Wage increases to 30.
- New budget line RQ
- 19 hours leisure, 5 hours work
- Income 150
Income effect overrides substitution effect
41Backward-Bending Supply of Labor
Wage ( per hour)
Hours of Work per Day
42Labor Supply for One- andTwo-Earner Households
- In twentieth century the percent of females in
labor force has increased - 1950 34
- 2001 60
- Compared the work choices of 94 unmarried females
w/work decisions of heads of households and
spouses in 397 families - Can describe work decisions by calculating
elasticity of supply for labor
43Elasticities of Labor Supply (Hours Worked)
44Labor Supply for One- andTwo-Earner Households
- When higher wage rate leads to fewer hours worked
- Labor supply curve is backward bending
- Income effect outweighs the substitution effect
- Elasticity of labor supply is negative
45Equilibrium in a Competitive Factor Market
- Competitive factor market is in equilibrium when
the prevailing price equate quantity supplied and
quantity demanded - Since workers are well informed, all received the
same wage and generate identical MRPL when
employed
46Equilibrium in a Competitive Factor Market
- If output market is perfectly competitive, demand
curve for an input measures benefit consumers
place on use of input in production process - Wage rate also reflects the cost of the firm and
to society of using additional unit of input - At equilibrium, MBL MCL wage
47Equilibrium in a Competitive Factor Market
- When output and input markets are both perfectly
competitive, resources are used efficiently - Maximize TB TC
- Efficiency requires MRPL equals the benefit to
consumers of the additional output, given by
(P)(MPL)
48Equilibrium in a Competitive Factor Market
- If output market is not competitive
- MRPL (P)(MPL) no longer holds
- (P)(MPL) gt MRPL
- At equilibrium number of workers, marginal cost
to firm, wM, is less than marginal benefit to
consumers vM. - Although firm maximizes profits, output is below
efficient level and uses less than efficient
level of output
49Equilibrium in a Competitive Factor Market
- If output market is not competitive
- Although firm maximizes profits, output is below
efficient level and uses less than efficient
level of output - Economic efficiency would be increased if more
laborers were hired and more output produced - Gains to consumers would outweigh firms lost
profit
50Labor Market Equilibrium
Monopolistic Output Market
Competitive Output Market
Wage
Wage
Number of Workers
Number of Workers
51Equilibrium in aCompetitive Factor Market
- Economic Rent
- For a factor market, economic rent is the
difference between the payments made to a factor
of production and the minimum amount that must be
spent to obtain the use of that factor. - The economic rent associated with the employment
of labor is the excess of wages paid above the
minimum amount needed to hire workers
52Economic Rent
Wage
0
Number of Workers
53Equilibrium in aCompetitive Factor Market
- Land A Perfectly Inelastic Supply
- Occurs when land for housing or agriculture is
fixed, as least in short run - Its price is determined entirely by demand
- When demand increases, rental value per unit
increases and total land rent increases
54Land Rent
Price ( per acre)
When demand increases, price and economic rent
increase.
Economic Rent
Number of Acres
55Pay in the Military
- During the Civil War 90 of the armed forces were
unskilled workers involved in ground combat. - Today, only 16 are unskilled workers involved in
ground combat. - Lead to severe shortages in skilled workers
56Pay in the Military
- Rank structure has stayed the same
- Pay increases determined primarily by years of
service - Similarly, officers with differing skill levels
often paid similar salaries - Many skilled workers leave the army since
salaries in private sector much higher
57The Shortage ofSkilled Military Personnel
Wage
Number of Skilled Workers
58Pay in the Military
- Solution
- Selective reenlistment bonuses targeted at
skilled jobs where there are shortages - With increases in demand for skilled military
jobs, we should expect the military increase
reenlistment bonuses and other market based
incentives
59Factor Markets with Monopsony Power
- We showed before that many firms have monopsony
buying power - US automobile companies as buyers of parts and
components - Assume
- The output market is perfectly competitive.
- Input market is pure monopsony.
60Factor Markets with Monopsony Power
- Marginal and Average Expenditure
- When choosing to purchase a good, increase amount
purchased until the marginal value equals
marginal expenditure - Price paid for good is average expenditure and is
equal to marginal expenditure
61Factor Markets with Monopsony Power
- Since a monopsonist pays the same price for each
unit, the supply curve is the average expenditure
curve - Upward sloping since deciding to buy an extra
unit raises price must pay for all units - For profit maximizing firm, marginal expenditure
curve lies above the average expenditure curve - Firm must pay all units the higher price, not
just last unit hired
62Marginal and Average Expenditure
Price (per unit of input)
20
15
10
- Hires where ME MRP
- LC is competitive market level
5
0
1
2
3
4
6
5
Units of Input
63Factor Markets with Monopsony Power
- Examples of Monopsony Power
- Government
- Soldiers
- Missiles
- B2 Bombers
- NASA
- Astronauts
- Company town
64Monopsony Power in the Market for Baseball Players
- Baseball owners operate a monopsonistic cartel
- Reserve clause prevented competition for players
- Each player tied to one team for life
- Once drafted, could not play for another team
unless rights were sold - Baseball owners has monopsony power in
negotiating new contracts
65Monopsony Power in the Market for Baseball Players
- During 1960s and 70s, players salaries were
far below market value of MP - If competitive market
- Players receiving 42,000 in 1969 would have
instead received a salary of 300,000 in 1969
dollars. - Strike in 1972 followed by lawsuit
66Monopsony Power inthe Market for Baseball Players
- In 1975, players could become free agents after
playing for a team for six years - Reserve clause no longer in effect
- Market became more competitive
- From 1975 to 1980, expenditures on players
contract went from 25 of team expenditures to
40 - Average player salary doubled in real terms
67Factor Markets with Monopoly Power
- Just as buyers of inputs can have monopsony
power, sellers of inputs can have monopoly power. - The most important example of monopoly power in
factor markets involves labor unions.
68Monopoly Power of Sellers of Labor
Wage per worker
- Demand w/no monopsony power.
- Supply of union labor w/no monopoly power.
- Labor market competitive with L workers hired at
wage w - Demand equals Supply
Number of Workers
69Monopoly Power of Sellers of Labor
- The unions monopoly power allows it to choose
any wage rate and quantity supplied - If wanted to maximize number of workers hired,
would choose competitive outcome. - If wanted to obtain higher wages, would restrict
membership to L1 workers to get hirer wage w1 - Those who find jobs are better off. Those
without jobs are worse off.
70Monopoly Power of Sellers of Labor
- Is restrictive union worthwhile?
- Yes, if maximizing economic rent is the goal.
- The union acts like a monopolist restricting
output to maximize profits - Rent for a union represents the wages earned in
excess of opportunity cost. - Union must choose workers so that the marginal
cost equals the marginal revenue
71Monopoly Power of Sellers of Labor
- Cost is the marginal opportunity cost since it is
a measure of what an employer has to offer an
additional worker to get him or her to work for
the firm. - But, the wage necessary to encourage additional
workers to take jobs is given by supply curve for
labor, SL
72Monopoly Power of Sellers of Labor
- Rent maximizing combination of wage rate and
number of workers is where MR crosses supply. - Price comes from the demand curve
- This gives a combination of L1 and w1
- Shaded area below the demand curve and above the
supply curve to the left of L1 is the economic
rent that all workers receive
73Monopoly Power of Sellers of Labor
Wage per worker
Maximizing rents to workers means choosing labor
where MR crosses S. Wage comes from demand.
Number of Workers
74Factor Markets with Monopoly Power
- Rent maximizing policy can help nonunion workers
if they can find nonunion jobs. - If jobs are not available, this could cause too
much of a distinction between winners and losers - Looking back at graph, an alternative objective
is to maximize aggregate wages that all union
members receive - This gives L2 and w2
75Unionized and Non-unionized Workers
- When union uses monopoly power, some workers are
not hired. Those workers either try to find
nonunion jobs or choose initially not to join
union. - Assume the total supply of workers is fixed
supply is SL - Demand for unionized labor is DU and demand for
non-unionized labor is DNU - Total market demand is DU DNU DL
76Unionized and Non-unionized Workers
- What if union chooses to raise wage above
competitive wage w, to wU - Number of workers hired by the union falls by
amount ?LU - As these workers find employment in nonunion
sector, wage rate in that sector adjusts until
labor market is in equilibrium - At new wage rate, wNU, additional numbers hired
in sector is ?LNU - Equals number of workers who left unionized sector
77Wage Discrimination in Labor Market
Wage per worker
When a monopolistic union raises the wage rate in
the unionized sector of the economy from w to
wU, employment in that sector falls.
For the total supply of labor to remain
unchanged, the wage in the non-unionized
sector must fall from w to wNU
Number of Workers
78The Decline of Private Sector Unionism
- Observations
- Union membership and monopoly power has been
declining. - Initially, during the 1970s, union wages
relative to nonunion wages fell.
79The Decline of Private Sector Unionism
- Observations
- In the 1980s union wages stabilized relative to
non-union wages. - In the 1990s membership has been falling and
wage differential has remained stable.
80The Decline of Private Sector Unionism
- Explanation
- The unions have been attempting to maximize the
individual wage rate instead of total wages paid. - The demand for unionized employees has probably
become increasingly elastic as firms find it
easier to substitute capital for skilled labor.
81Wage Inequality Have Computers Changed the
Labor Market?
- 1950 - 1980
- Relative wage of college graduates to high-school
graduates hardly changed - 1980-1995
- The relative wage grew rapidly
82Wage Inequality Have Computers Changed the
Labor Market?
- In 1984, 25.1 of all workers used computers
- 1993 45.8
- 2001 53.5
- For managers and professionals it was over 80
83Wage Inequality Have Computers Changed the
Labor Market?
- Percent change in use of computers
- College degrees
- 1984 - 1993 -- 42 to 82
- Less than high school degree
- 11 - from 5 to 16
- With high school degree
- 21 - from 19 to 40
84Wage Inequality Have Computers Changed the
Labor Market?
- Growth in wages 1983 to 1993
- College graduates using computers 11
- Non-computer users less than 4
- Statistical analysis show that overall the spread
of computer technology is responsible for nearly
half the increase in relative wages during this
period
85Wage Inequality Have Computers Changed the
Labor Market?
- Is this increase in relative wages of skilled
workers bad? - Although growing inequality can disadvantage
low-wage workers, it can also motivate workers - Opportunities for upward mobility through
high-wage jobs have never been better.
86Wage Inequality Have Computers Changed the
Labor Market?
- Should you complete a college degree?
- In 2000, college graduates age 25 and over earned
nearly 400 more per week than those with only a
high school diploma - This is a real wage increase for college grads
and a real wage decrease for high school dropouts
compared to 1979. - Unemployment rate among college grads is four
times less than in high school drop outs