Hall C Research Program - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Hall C Research Program

Description:

Worry about capital funds and beam time needed to finalize large installations ... 2) Sufficient technical manpower to prepare installations well, saving ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: rolf4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Hall C Research Program


1
Hall C Research Program
  • Have been running experiments since November 1995
  • 613 PAC Days run, or 29.7 experiments (? 61 PAC
    days/year)
  • 263 (77) PAC Days in queue, or 12.6 experiments
  • (almost all large-scale
    installation experiments)
  • (Backlog 4.1 Years, assuming 70 PAC
    days/year)
  • 79 Ph.D. Subjects, 51 Ph.D.s awarded
  • 38 refereed publications to date (20 PRL), 5
    submitted
  • (not including
    NIM papers)
  • 8 Large Installations to date t20, GEn-98,
    HNSS,

  • GEn-00, GEn-01, G0 (x2), HKS
  • 400 users representing 20 different countries
  • No collaboration, but steering committee (Beise,
    Hashimoto, Opper, Van Oers) to represent user
    community involved in diverse Hall C program
    dominated by large-installation experiments.

2
Experiments completed in Hall C since 2004
DAYS
47
25
10
7
14
4.33
1.67
19
7
  • HMS SOS running until mid-January, 2005
  • In January, 2005 installation of the HKS
    experiment started
  • In October, 2005 installation of the
    G0-Backward experiment started

S 135 70/year
3
Hall C Approved Experiment Summary
Base Equipment Experiments (1.6 experiments, 16
days) E04-001 Measurements of F2 and R on
Nuclear Targets 5 days, 1/3
complete E05-017 Measurement of Two-Photon
Exchange in 13 days Unpolarized Elastic e-p
Scattering
Large Installation Experiments beyond HKS (11
experiments, 274 days) E04-115 G0 Backward Angle
Measurements 70 days A E04-101 Measurement
of the PV Asymmetry for the N-D 0
days B E05-108 G0 Backward Angle Measurements
(II) (50) days A- E04-108 Measurement of
GEp/GMp to Q2 9 GeV2 40 days A E04-019 Measu
rement of the Two-Photon Exchange Contribution
18 days A- in e-p Elastic Scattering Using
Recoil Polar. E03-109 Spin Asymmetries on the
Nucleon Experiment 27 days A- E04-113 Semi-Inc
lusive Spin Asymmetries on the Nucleon 25
days A- E05-101 Helicity Correlations in
Wide-Angle Compton Scattering 14
days A- E05-008 The Qweak Experiment A Search
for Physics at the TeV 35 days A Scale via a
Meas. of the Protons Weak Charge E04-110 The
Neutron Electric Form Factor at Q2 4.3 GeV2
from 25 days A- the D(e,en) Reaction via
Recoil Polarimetry E05-115 Spectroscopic
Investigation of Hypernuclei in (II) 20
days A-
4
  • Realistic Assumption on Hall C experiments,
    including
  • a) hidden backlog
  • b) installation times
  • Typical Hall C year 70 PAC days 4-month long
    installation
  • G0 Backward at 687 MeV ( N-D) 70 PAC days 5
    months 2006
  • G0 Backward at 362 MeV (50 PAC days)
  • GEp-III 40 PAC days 4 months 2007
  • GEp-2gamma 18 PAC days
  • SANE Experiment 27 PAC days 3 months
    2008?
  • Semi-SANE Experiment 25 PAC days
  • Wide-Angle Compton Scattering 25 PAC days
  • HMS L/T (A gt 2) 3 PAC days
  • e-p Linearity Test 13 PAC days
  • Qweak Phase I 35 PAC days 6 months ?
  • HKS-HES Experiment 20 PAC days 4 months
    ?
  • GEn at Q2 4.3 25 PAC days 3 months
  • HMS L/T (A 2) 9 PAC days
  • HKS-HES Experiment II 30 PAC days

5
  • Present experimental program of Hall C
  • Only 1.6 non-large installation experiments left
    (16 days)
  • (cost left to finalize)
  • G0 Backward Angle Large Installation 0.1M
  • (estimate by Allison Lung collaboration, DOE
    contribution only)
  • GEp-III Two-Photon Exchange Large
    Installation 0.5M
  • (includes FPP cost, scattering chamber, and
    0.2M cost for large installations)
  • Spin Asymmetries of the Nucleon
  • Semi-Inclusive Spin Asymmetries of the Nucleon
    WACS
  • Large Installation 0.3M
  • (collaborations use grant funds for detectors)
  • Qweak Large Installation 1.0M
  • (does not include NSF/NSERC funding)
  • GEn Experiment at Q2 4.3 Large
    Installation 0.3M
  • (collaboration intends to scrounge purchase
    some detectors)
  • HKS/HES Experiment Large Installation 0.5M
  • (needs also new power supply, Japanese have
    secured 3M for HES)
  • Additional (ongoing) work to improve reliability
    of HMS magnets and cryotargets, LCW system,
    Moller/detector upgrades 0.6M
  • Compton Polarimeter 9.5KA Power Supply 1.2M

6
  • Summary (as shown at SANE meeting of September,
    2005)
  • Reduction of technical crew by almost two has
    caught up with large installations
  • HKS installation barely in time ? no quality
    checkout before start HKS.
  • Cant do professional job of preparing well for
    next experiments, e.g. G0.
  • Direct impact (far) longer installation times,
    and delay of 2005/2006
  • schedule by about 3 months.
  • Hall C physics program is now essentially only
    large-installation experiments.
  • Worry about capital funds and beam time needed
    to finalize large installations
  • in reasonable time frame.
  • Can only finalize experimental program in
    reasonable time scale if
  • 1) Sufficient Capital funds to keep large
    installations moving. ?
  • 2) Sufficient technical manpower to prepare
    installations well, saving
  • largely on actual installation times. ?
  • 3) Schedule large-installation experiments as
    large blocks of time.
  • 4) Need to run at least 70 PAC days per year. ?
  • SANE specific will purchase new scattering
    chamber early in FY06, construction
  • of polarized target raster systems ongoing,
    anticipated scheduling date 2008?
  • SANE experiment essential to fulfill DOE
    Performance Measure milestone by 2011.

7
Very Old Long-Term Experiment
Schedule(assuming continuation of FY05 budgets
early 2005 version)
2005
  • Hypernuclear Physics
  • HKS Experiment (Hashimoto, Nakamura, Reinhold,
    Tang) (1.8-2.0 GeV)
  • Hypernuclear Life Time Experiment (Hu, Margaryan,
    Tang)
  • Transition to E04-115 Experiment (Beck, G0
    Backward)
  • G0 Backward Run (0.8 GeV)
  • Transition to E04-108 Experiment (September, 2005
    )
  • GEp-III Run (Perdrisat, Brash, Jones, Punjabi)
  • 2-g Exchange Run intermixed?
  • HMS/SOS L/T Runs? (Bodek, Christy, Keppel)
  • Polarized Target Runs
  • SANE (g2 at high Q2) Run (Rondon, Meziani, Choi)
  • Semi-SANE (flavor decompositions) Run (Jiang,
    Bosted, Day, Jones)
  • Qweak (Bowman, Carlini, Finn, Kowalski, Page)
    Phase I
  • GEn Run (Madey, Anderson, Kowalski, Semenov)
  • Qweak (Bowman, Carlini, Finn, Kowalski, Page)
    Phase II?

2006
2007
2008
2009
2012? Start 12-GeV Program?
8
Old Long-Term Experiment Schedule(taking into
account a 3-month delay in the HKS/G0 schedules,
this is the version pre-PAC-28)
2005
  • Hypernuclear Physics
  • HKS Experiment (Hashimoto, Nakamura, Reinhold,
    Tang)
  • Hypernuclear Life Time Experiment (Hu, Margaryan,
    Tang)
  • Transition to E04-115 Experiment (Beck, G0
    Backward)
  • G0 Backward Run (0.8 GeV 0.4 GeV)
  • Transition to E04-108 Experiment (January, 2006
    )
  • GEp-III Run (Perdrisat, Brash, Jones, Punjabi)
  • 2-g Exchange Run intermixed?
  • HMS L/T Runs? (Arrington, Bodek, Keppel)
  • Polarized Target Runs
  • SANE (g2 at high Q2) Run (Rondon, Meziani, Choi)
  • Semi-SANE (flavor decomposition) Run (Jiang,
    Bosted, Day, Jones)
  • Helicity in WACS Run? (Day, Wojtsekhowski)
  • Qweak (Bowman, Carlini, Finn, Kowalski, Page)
    Phase I
  • GEn Run (Madey, Anderson, Kelly, Kowalski,
    Semenov)?
  • Qweak (Bowman, Carlini, Finn, Kowalski, Page)
    Phase II?
  • HKS(II) Run?
  • Start 12 GeV program?

2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2012?
9
  • Hall C FY06 Budget 10/05 (Revised 12/05)
  • Operations budget FY04 we used 1,270K
  • FY05 we had 1,190K, used it, but had an
  • error of the bank ? 100K left
  • FY06 expected 1,090K ( 100K carry-over)
  • Capital budget 140K carry-over (screw-up in
    procurement)
  • Capital budget 120K G0 Backward
  • 536K Qweak (magnet stand, collimators,
    target)
  • 620K 200K needed for GEp-III
  • (new scattering chamber, GHS, etc)
  • 50K typical for target group work
  • 100K for SANE/semi-SANE/WACS
  • (long-lead scattering chamber, etc)
  • 175K for ½ of 9.5 kA power supply
  • 20K for HKS/HES work
  • 25K for HMS new controls
  • 250K to start Compton work MIT/Bates
  • ? of order 200K short on capital

10
Upcoming Program in Hall C
Schedule has shifted again due to forced Summer
down
11
Spin Asymmetries on the Nucleon Status
Now encompasses two experiments E03-109 SANE
(Rondon, Choi, Meziani) g1 g2
at Q2 4 GeV2 E04-113 Semi-SANE (Bosted, Day,
Jiang, Jones) Semi-Inclusive Spin Asymm.
  • Designed to be insensitive to backgrounds and
    have good Particle Id. Target field screens much
    of low-energy background.
  • Gas Cherenkov (Temple)
  • Particle identifications (e/p)
  • Minimal knock-on
  • Prototype tested in Hall C
  • Design Construction Now
  • Lucite Cherenkov (Norfolk State)
  • Redundant P.Id. coarse tracking
  • Quartz detector as a Hodoscope
  • before gas Cherenkov under
  • consideration for e/e- separation
  • Pb-Glass Calorimeter from GEp-III
  • Add gain monitoring system (UVa)

Scattering Chamber under design, long-lead item
in FY06 Uniform polarized target raster RD
completed, construction done
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com