Title: How Governance can still be successful
1How Governance can still be successful
- Nicolai Dose Chair of Political Science
Technical University Munich
2Outline
- Shortcomings of Steering Approaches
- My Argument
- Governance Definition
- Ambivalence of goals
- Solving problems instead of curing symptoms
- Analytical problem categories
- Linking problem categories to instruments
3Outline (continued)
- Analyzing the prospective settlement costs
- Criteria for assessment
- Summing up
- Conclusions
4Shortcomings of Steering Approaches
- Neglect of denationalization processes
- No analyses of societal problems
- No idea how to cope with uncertainty
- Missing integration of settlement costs into
steering concepts
5My Argument
- Successful governance needs systematic
information - on the analytical type of problem,
- on the prospective settlement costs,
- on the instruments of goverance, and
- (on the institutional setting)
6Governance Definition
- Governance is the attendance of matters being
perceived as public with the aim to increase
common weal irrespective of the steering
actors(see Zürn 1996 and Mayntz 2004).
7Ambivalence of goals
- Contradictory goals are absolutely normal
- Goals must be determined politically
- Science can help by indicating the consequences
of certain decisions
8Solving problems instead of curing symptoms
- Analytical problem categories
- Linking problem categories to instruments
9societal and ecological problems, e.g.
health hazardous micro dust caused by automobile
traffic
insufficient training sides for apprentices
no or slow environmental innovation
lack of housing
10analytical problem categories
societal and ecological problems, e.g.
health hazardous micro dust caused by automobile
traffic
negative externalities
positive externalities
insufficient training sides for apprentices
indivisibilities and irreversibilities
no or slow environmental innovation
lack of information
lack of housing
rigidities
11analytical problem categories
instruments of governance with specific problem
solving capacities
societal and ecological problems, e.g.
health hazardous micro dust caused by automobile
traffic
negative externalities
mandatory regulation
negative financial incentives
positive externalities
positive financial incentives
insufficient training sides for apprentices
indivisibilities and irreversibilities
negotiated agreements
no or slow environmental innovation
lack of information
persuasion
information
lack of housing
rigidities
institution building
12Analytical problem categories (selection)
- externalities
- imperfect information
13Externalities
- Type I positive or negative side effects are
generated without any compen-sation gt see
environment - Type II regional spill-over effects a problem
is generated in a region and affects a
neighboring region - Type III intertemporal externalities, e.g. costs
are shifted to future generations
14Imperfect information
- ignorance the actors do not possess the
necessary information although this information
does exist - substantive uncertainty not all necessary
information is available - strategic uncertainty it is not possible to
predict the decisions and actions of the other
relevant actors
15Linking problem categories to instruments
- Look for the instruments with a potential to
lessen the analytical problem, i.e. - externalities should be overcome in the direction
of internalization, and - imperfect information should be reduced.
16(No Transcript)
17(No Transcript)
18Then choose the instrument that fits best by
- considering the prerequisites for success,
- taking into account the prospective settlement
costs, and by - referring to the criteria for assessment
19Prerequisites for success
- The instruments of governance have quite
different prerequisites for success, e.g.
- substantive rules and negative financial
incentives need a functioning civil service - information and counseling need some information
about the preference structure of the target
group
20Analyzing the prospective settlement costs
Make the policy categories of Theodore J. Lowi
workable by taking a certain point of view
- Take the perception of the persons concerned
- Look at the isolated measure
- Look at the possible impact
21Analyzing the prospective settlement costs
(continued)
- Distributive policiesMoney, goods, services, or
legal positions are distributed without being
aware that perceived rights of other persons are
affected. - Regulative policiesNothing is distributed any
longer. Instead restrictions are imposed for the
future.
22Analyzing the prospective settlement costs
(continued)
- Redistributive policiesAn actor is clearly and
perceivably taken away a legal position or
additional costs have to be incurred. In general,
what is taken away is given to another actor or
group of actors.
23(No Transcript)
24Criteria for assessment
- principle of averting dangers
- cost efficiency
- dynamic efficiency
- accuracy
25Criteria for assessment (continued)
- financial burden
- compatibility with parallel steering activities
- administrative costs
- soundness of the overall concept
- necessary steering knowledge
26Summing up
27societal and environmental problems
analytical problem categories
instruments - instruments - instruments
prerequisites for success
prospective settlement costs
criteria for assessment
chosen mix of instruments
28societal and environmental problems
analytical problem categories
instruments - instruments - instruments
prerequisites for success
prospective settlement costs
criteria for assessment
the analytical tools of the New Governance are
open to all participants
decision taken in open discourse
chosen mix of instruments
29Conclusions
Governance can be successful
- if the societal and ecological problems are
analyzed thoroughly, - if the full range of instruments is considered,
- if the prerequisites of success are taken care of,
30Conclusions (continued)
Governance can be successful
- if the settlement costs are integrated in the
governance concept, and - if the instruments are chosen considering the
criteria for assessment.
31Advantages of the New Governance Approach
- The public discourse will be de-emotionalized
- We have an analytical tool at hand that is
powerful - for policy design, just as for
- policy analysis.