Multilateral Control of Internet Infrastructure and its Impact on US Sovereignty

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Multilateral Control of Internet Infrastructure and its Impact on US Sovereignty

Description:

International legitimacy for ICANN. No single organization in control ... ICANN matters, but isn't vital; Power is symbolic or illusory ... –

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: cuk5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Multilateral Control of Internet Infrastructure and its Impact on US Sovereignty


1
Multilateral Control of Internet Infrastructure
and its Impact on US Sovereignty
  • Kenneth Neil Cukier

Or 80 pages with 150 notes in 9 slides and 15
minutes -- going from back to front
2
Conclusion
  • US ceding authority over XCANN represents a
    slight loss of sovereignty and power, but
    provided the USs broader interests are achieved,
    this is not a reason to change policy

3
Key US interests
  • Decentralized open architecture
  • Multi-stakeholder process
  • International legitimacy for ICANN
  • No single organization in control
  • White Paper goals (open, accountable, etc.)

4
ICANN matters, but isnt vital Power is symbolic
or illusory
  • US only has power so long as it remains unused
  • Whatever benefit of control, US can achieve by
    other means
  • More problems for US from retaining control than
    ceding it.

5
Empirical v. theoretical power
  • A few examples
  • Wiretap and IETF
  • WIPO and US law
  • Root server placement and ICANN process
  • .kids and .kids.us

6
Why we should care
  • Internet coordination is the one place, that if
    used, could impact mainstream political matters
    -- and freedoms/rights -- like free expression,
    privacy, low-cost access, etc.

7
Why we shouldnt care
  • Tough to find a way that using control of ICANN
    to promote national interest cant be done more
    easily and effectively on a national level instead

8
The horror stories
  • are so remote that theres no vital interest at
    stake, e.g.
  • ICANN deletes .fr from the root
  • XCANN cancels US IP number assignments

9
What we need to remember
  • The Internet Protocol is just that, a protocol,
    an agreement -- thats all it is.
  • Entities retain the right to deviate from its use
    -- so a healthy balance-of-power to constrain
    power exists among stakeholders.
  • Sticky power holds us all in

10
Key interest
  • Maintain decentralized architecture (for
    innovation and technical reinvention)
  • Not render sacrosanct current DNS system or
    organization to manage it

11
Thank you
  • Kenneth Neil Cukier
  • ltkn_at_cukier.comgt
  • ltKennethCukier_at_Economist.comgt
  • Paper online at
  • www.cukier.com/writings/cukier-netgov-TPRC04.pdf
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com