Title: QUALITY CONTROL AND SPC
1OM
CHAPTER 16
QUALITY CONTROL AND SPC
DAVID A. COLLIER AND JAMES R. EVANS
2Chapter 16 Learning Outcomes
l e a r n i n g o u t c o m e s
LO1 Describe quality control system and key
issues in manufacturing and service. LO2
Explain types of variation and the role of
statistical process control. LO3 Describe how
to construct and interpret simple control charts
for both continuous and discrete data. LO4
Describe practical issues in implementing
SPC. LO5 Explain process capability and
calculate process capability indexes.
3Chapter 16 Quality Control and SPC
arriott has become
infamous for its obsessively detailed
standard operating procedures
(SOPs), which result in
hotels that travelers either love for their
consistent good quality or hate for their bland
uniformity. This is a company that has more
controls, more systems, and more procedural
manuals than anyoneexcept the government, says
one industry veteran. And they actually comply
with them. Housekeepers work with a 114-point
checklist. One SOP Server knocks three times.
After knocking, the associate should immediately
identify themselves in a clear voice, saying,
Room Service! The guests name is never
mentioned outside the door. Although people love
to make fun of such procedures, they are a
serious part of Marriotts business, and SOPs are
designed to protect the brand. Recently,
Marriott has removed some of the rigid guidelines
for owners of hotels it manages, empowering them
to make some of their own decisions on details.
What do you think? What opportunities for
improved quality control or use of SOPs can you
think of at your college or university (e.g.,
bookstore, cafeteria)?
4Chapter 16 Quality Control and SPC
Quality Control Systems The task of quality
control is to ensure that a good or service
conforms to specifications and meets customer
requirements by monitoring and measuring
processes and making any necessary adjustments to
maintain a specified level of performance.
5Chapter 16 Quality Control and SPC
- Quality Control Systems
- Quality Control Systems have three components
- A performance standard or goal,
- A means of measuring actual performance, and
- Comparison of actual performance with the
standard to form the basis for corrective action.
6Chapter 16 Quality Control and SPC
110100 Rule If a defect or service error is
identified and corrected in the design stage, it
might cost 1 to fix. If it is first detected
during the production process, it might cost 10
to fix. However, if the defect is not discovered
until it reaches the customer, it might cost 100
to correct.
7Chapter 16 Quality Control and SPC
Quality at the source means the people
responsible for the work control the quality of
their processes by identifying and correcting any
defects or errors when they first are recognized
or occur.
8Chapter 16 Quality Control and SPC
- Quality Control Practices in Manufacturing
- Supplier Certification and Management ensures
conformance to requirements before value-adding
operations begin. - In-process control ensures that defective
outputs do not leave the process and prevents
defects in the first place. - Finished goods control verifies that product
meets customer requirements.
9Chapter 16 Quality Control and SPC
- Quality Control Practices in Services
- Prevent sources of errors and mistakes in the
first place by using poka-yoke approaches. - Customer satisfaction measurement with actionable
results (responses that are tied directly to key
business processes). - Many quality control tools and practices apply to
both goods and services.
10Chapter 16 Quality Control and SPC
- Statistical Process Control and Variation
- Statistical process control (SPC) is a
methodology for monitoring quality of
manufacturing and service delivery processes to
help identify and eliminate unwanted causes of
variation.
11Chapter 16 Quality Control and SPC
- Statistical Process Control and Variation
- Common cause variation is the result of complex
interactions of variations in materials, tools,
machines, information, workers, and the
environment. - Common cause variation accounts for 80 to 95
percent of the observed variation in a process. - Only management has the power to change systems
and infrastructure that cause common cause
variation.
12Chapter 16 Quality Control and SPC
- Statistical Process Control and Variation
- Special (assignable) cause variation arises from
external sources that are not inherent in the
process, appear sporadically, and disrupt the
random pattern of common causes. - Special cause variation accounts for 15 to 20
percent of observed variation. - Front-line employees and supervisors have the
power to identify and solve special causes of
variation.
13Chapter 16 Quality Control and SPC
- Foundations of Statistical Process Control
- Stable system a system governed only by common
causes. - In control if no special causes affect the
output of the process. - Out of control when special causes are present
in the process.
14Chapter 16 Quality Control and SPC
- Constructing Control Charts
- Steps 1 through 4 focus on setting up an initial
chart in step 5, the charts are used for ongoing
monitoring and finally, in step 6, the data are
used for process capability analysis. - Preparation
- Choose the metric to be monitored.
- Determine the basis, size, and frequency of
sampling. - Set up the control chart.
15Chapter 16 Quality Control and SPC
- Constructing Control Charts
- Data collection
- Record the data.
- Calculate relevant statistics averages, ranges,
proportions, and so on. - Plot the statistics on the chart.
- Determination of trial control limits
- Draw the center line (process average) on the
chart. - Compute the upper and lower control limits.
16Chapter 16 Quality Control and SPC
- Constructing Control Charts
- Analysis and interpretation
- Investigate the chart for lack of control.
- Eliminate out-of-control points.
- Recompute control limits if necessary.
- Use as a problem-solving tool
- Continue data collection and plotting.
- Identify out-of-control situations and take
corrective action. - 6. Determination of process capability using
the control chart data
17Chapter 16 Quality Control and SPC
- Foundations of Statistical Process Control
- A continuous metric is one that is calculated
from data that are measured as the degree of
conformance to a specification on a continuous
scale of measurement. - A discrete metric is one that is calculated from
data that are counted.
18Chapter 16 Quality Control and SPC
- Foundations of Statistical Process Control
- SPC uses control charts, run charts to which two
horizontal lines, called control limits, are
added the upper control limit (UCL) and lower
control limit (LCL). - Control limits are chosen statistically to
provide a high probability (generally greater
than 0.99) that points will fall between these
limits if the process is in control.
19Chapter 16 Quality Control and SPC
- Foundations of Statistical Process Control
- As a problem-solving tool, control charts allow
employees to identify quality problems as they
occur. Of course, control charts alone cannot
determine the source of the problem.
20Chapter 16 Constructing x-bar and R-Charts
16.1
16.2
16.3
21Chapter 16 Quality Control and SPC
- Solved Problem Goodman Tire and Rubber Company
- Goodman Tire periodically tests its tires for
tread wear under simulated road conditions using
x- and R-charts. - Company collects twenty samples, each containing
three radial tires from different shifts over
several days of operations. - x-bar Control Limits
- UCL 31.88 1.02(10.8) 42.9
- LCL 31.88 1.02(10.8) 20.8
22Excel Template for Goodman Tire x-bar and R-Charts
Exhibit 16.1
23Exhibit 16.2
R-Chart for Goodman Tire Example
24Exhibit 16.3
x-Chart for Goodman Tire Example
25Chapter 16 Quality Control and SPC
- Interpreting Patterns in Control Charts
- A process is said to be in control when the
control chart has the following characteristics - No points are outside the control limits (the
traditional and most popular SPC chart
guideline). - The number of points above and below the center
line is about the same. - The points seem to fall randomly above and below
the center line. - Most points, but not all, are near the center
line, and only a few are close to the control
limits.
26Chapter 16 Quality Control and SPC
- Interpreting Patterns in Control Charts
- A more in-depth understanding of SPC charts
includes evaluating the patterns in the sample
data using guidelines, such as - 8 points in a row above or below the center line
- 10 of 11 consecutive points above or below the
center line - 12 of 14 consecutive points above or below the
center line - 2 of 3 consecutive points in the outer one-third
region between the center line and one of the
control limits - 4 of 5 consecutive points in the outer two-thirds
region between the center line and one of the
control limits
27Exhibit Extra
Illustration of Some Rules for Identifying
Out-of-Control Conditions
28Chapter 16 Constructing p-charts
16.4
16.5
16.6
29Exhibit 16.4
Data and Calculations for p-Chart Solved Problem
30p-Chart for ZIP Code Reader Solved Problem
withConstant Sample Size
Exhibit 16.5
31Chapter 16 Constructing c-charts
- Constructing c-charts
- Where p-chart monitors the proportion of
nonconforming items, a c-chart monitors the
number of nonconformances per unit (i.e., a
count of the number of defects, errors, failures,
etc.). - Example one customers purchase order may have
several errors, such as wrong items, order
quantity, or wrong price.
16.7
32Chapter 16 Constructing c-charts
- Constructing c-charts
- These charts are used extensively in service
organizations. - To use a c-chart, the size of the sampling unit
or the number of opportunities for errors remains
constant. - Examples of c-chart applications a fender or
windshield on a certain automobile model, ceramic
coffee cups all of same size and shape, etc.
16.7
33Exhibit 16.6
Machine Failure Data for c-Chart Solved Problem
The number of machine failures over a 25-day
period.
34Exhibit 16.7
c-Chart for Machine Failures
35Chapter 16 Control Chart Design
- Control Chart Design
- Sample size small sample size keeps costs lower
however, large sample sizes provide greater
degrees of statistical accuracy in estimating the
true state of control. - Sampling frequency samples should be close
enough to provide an opportunity to detect
changes in process characteristics as soon as
possible and reduce the chances of producing a
large amount of nonconforming output.
36Chapter 16 Quality Control and SPC
- Other Practical Issues in SPC Implementation
- SPC is a useful methodology for processes that
operate at a low sigma level (less than or equal
to 3-sigma). - However, when the rate of defects is extremely
low, standard control limits are not so
effective. - For processes with a high sigma level (greater
than 3-sigma), few defects will be discovered
even with large sample sizes.
37Chapter 16 Quality Control and SPC
- Process Capability
- Process capability is the natural variation in a
process that results from common causes. - Cp (UTL LTL) 16.9
- 6s
- Where
- UTL Â upper tolerance limit
- LTL lower tolerance limit
- s standard deviation of the process (or an
estimate based on the sample standard
deviation, s)
38Chapter 16 Quality Control and SPC
- Process Capability
- Process capability is the natural variation in a
process that results from common causes. - When Cp 1, the natural variation is the same as
the design specification width, as in Exhibit
16.8(b). - When Cp lt 1, a significant percentage of output
will not conform to the specifications as in
Exhibit 16.8(a).
39Exhibit 16.8
Process Capability versus Design Specifications
40Chapter 16 Quality Control and SPC
- Process Capability
- Cp gt 1, indicates good capability as in Exhibit
16.8(c) in fact, many firms require Cp values of
1.66 or greater from their suppliers, which
equates to a tolerance range of about 10 standard
deviations. - The value of Cp does not depend on the mean of
the process thus, a process may be off-center,
such as in Exhibit 16.8(d), and still show an
acceptable value of Cp.
41Exhibit 16.8
Process Capability Versus Design Specifications
42Chapter 16 Quality Control and SPC
One-sided capability indices that consider off-
centered processes Cpu (UTL
µ)/3s 16.10 Cpl (µ LTL)/3s 16.11
Cpk Min (Cpl, Cpu) 16.12 where UTL
 upper tolerance limit LTL lower tolerance
limit µ the mean performance of the
process s standard deviation of the process
(or an estimate based on the sample
standard deviation, s)
43Chapter 16 Solved Problem
A controlled process shows an overall mean of
2.50 and an average range of 0.42. Samples of
size 4 were used to construct the control charts.
Part A What is the process capability? From
Appendix B, d2 2.059, s R/d2 0.42/2.059
0.20. Thus, the process capability is 2.50 ?
3(.020), or 1.90 to 3.10. Part B If
specifications are 2.60 0.25, how well can this
process meet them? Because the specification
range is 2.35 to 2.85 with a target of 2.60, we
may conclude that the observed natural variation
exceeds the specifications by a large amount. In
addition, the process is off-center (see Exhibit
16.9).
44Comparison of Observed Variation and Design
Specifications for Solved Problem
Exhibit 16.9