Qualitative, Observation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Qualitative, Observation

Description:

Quantitative Vs Qualitative Research. Quantitative V Qualitative ... legal ramifications should the rights or dignity of participants be infringed ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1229
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: hopeliv
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Qualitative, Observation


1
Qualitative, Observation Ethics
  • Network of Hope

2
Quantitative Vs Qualitative Research
  • Quantitative V Qualitative
  • Traditional approach ? Empiricism ? Positivism-
    Quantification
  • Mirrors Natural Sciences
  • Experimental
  • Objective
  • Systematic - behaviour as measurable
  • Structured / mechanistic / rigorous
  • Predictive ? hypothesis testing

3
Quantitative Research
  • Pros and cons of Quantitative Research
  • Predictive
  • Efficient / Cost Effective
  • Generalise to a wider population
  • Statistical validity- of Quantitative Research,
    but
  • Lack ecological validity
  • Reductionist
  • Deterministic
  • Experimenter bias

4
Qualitative Research
  • Interpretative Research
  • Qualitative techniques
  • Subjective experience
  • Meaning not imposed but constructed
  • Language
  • Interviews
  • Focus Groups
  • Diaries
  • Discourse Analysis
  • Content Analysis
  • Thematic Analysis

5
Reflexivity
  • Reflexivity impacts into
  • Individual - account
  • Researcher interpretation

6
and pros and cons of Qualitative Research
  • Rich data / meaning
  • Real life / relevant
  • Expensive
  • time consuming (transcription/analysis is
    laborious)
  • training relies on experience
  • Subjective could be pro, or con!
  • Potential for bias

7
Interview gt thematic analysis
  • Triangulation

Questionnaire
Observation
8
Quantitative V Qualitative
  • Value Free
  • Objective
  • Detached
  • Averages to norm
  • Hypothesis Testing
  • Fixed
  • Abstract
  • Passive
  • Political
  • Interpretative
  • Empathic
  • Individualises
  • Speculative
  • Subjective
  • Flexible
  • Grounded
  • Active
  • Reflexive

9
Observation
  • Observe an unconstrained segment of a person or
    animals freely chosen behaviour
  • Can be an add-on, or a design in itself
  • Involves systematic description of events,
    behaviours, frequencies etc.
  • Can be done both inside the lab, and in the real
    world (high ecological validity)

10
Why Observe?
  • To study interactions within a group (human or
    animal)

11
To study more naturalistic behaviour
Personal space
Paganism in uk
Natural behaviour of the
rat
12
To study a specific setting e.g. hospital
13
Time sampling
  • Observe for a set time interval e.g. 10s 2
    hours
  • Or at set time intervals, record whether a
    behaviour is occurring

14
Event Sampling
  • Observe specific events
  • May be infrequent
  • Look at patterns of behaviour

15
Types of Observation
  • Participant or non-participant
  • Disclosed (overt) or closed (covert)
  • Structured or non-structured
  • Controlled or naturalistic

16
Operationally defined categoriesInter-observe
r (rater) reliability
(r 0.7 or more)

Person onesrating
Person twos rating
17
Structured Observation
  • Advantages
  • Systematic
  • Control of extraneous variables
  • Easy to replicate
  • Low observer bias
  • Disadvantages
  • Low ecological validity
  • Not always possible, or ethical
  • Behaviour might not be spontaneous or natural

18
Naturalistic Observation
  • Advantages
  • Natural behaviour (particularly if participants
    unaware they are being observed)
  • High ecological validity
  • Disadvantages
  • Poor control of extraneous variables
  • Increased observer bias
  • Low reliability
  • Low replicability

19
Participant Observation
  • Advantages
  • Access to previously inaccessible areas
  • High ecological validity
  • Very rich information
  • Flexible
  • Disadvantages
  • Reliance on memory (cant always be seen to be
    taking notes)
  • Emotional involvement
  • Danger to researcher
  • Researchers behaviour can alter that of the
    group
  • Ethical problems

20
Ethnography
  • Any full or partial description of a group
    ethno (folk) and graphy (description)
  • Involves gathering data from a range of sources
    e.g. interviews, observations, documents,
    diaries, art and conversations.

21
Used by anthropologists I.e. researchers who
study groups of people e.g. Papua New Guinea,
Australian aboriginees
22
Ethics BPS necessarily impose a strict set of
ethical criteria that researchers MUST adhere to.
The main areas are
  • Protection
  • Observational Research
  • De-briefing
  • Advice
  • Colleagues
  • General Criteria
  • Consent
  • Deception
  • Withdrawal
  • Confidentiality

23
Ethics
  • General criteria
  • 1. Mutual Respect and Confidence
  • 2. Researchers must share and promote good
    research practice
  • 3. Take responsibility for own actions and accept
    legal ramifications should the rights or dignity
    of participants be infringed
  • 4. From a multi-cultural and multi-ethnic
    viewpoint investigators must consider age, gender
    and social background and, any threats posed to
    participants in respect of, psychological
    well-being, health, values or dignity.

24
Consent
  • Wherever possible participants must be made aware
    of the full research parameters.
  • Special care and safeguards must be put in place
    for children / adults with impairment
  • Consent must be obtained for those under 16
    years. If this is not possible then consent must
    be obtained from the Ethics Committee

25
Consent continued..
  • Special care must be
  • taken with detained
  • individuals
  • Researchers must be
  • aware of their position
  • of authority and not
  • coerce participants

26
Consent continued..
  • Payment must not be used as such an inducement
  • Repeated consent may be needed in longitudinal
    research

27
Deception
  • Withholding information or misleading
    participants is unacceptable if participants are
    likely to object or show unease once debriefed
  • Participants should never be intentionally
    misled.
  • If deception is unavoidable 3 criteria must be
    adhered to
  • No other procedure/method available
  • Participants informed at the earliest opportunity
  • Consider / Consult on how withholding
    information will be received

28
Other Factors
  • Debriefing
  • Withdrawal / Confidentiality
  • Protection

29
De-Briefing
  • Participants must be supplied with additional
    information pertaining to the research.
  • Debriefing does not justify any unethical
    deception
  • Some effects which may be produced by an
    experiment will not be alleviated by a verbal
    description following the research.

30
Withdrawal / Confidentiality
  • Participants must be made aware of the right to
    withdraw at any time irrespective of any payment
    made

31
Withdrawal cont.
  • Participants must be made aware that they can
    withdraw retrospectively
  • Confidentiality must be assured to participants
    unless otherwise agreed in advance, and, that
    there data will not be identifiable. If
    confidentiality / anonymity cannot be guaranteed
    then participants must be notified in advance
    (Data Protection Act)

32
Protection
  • Researchers have a responsibility to protect
    participants and risk must be no greater than in
    everyday life
  • Participants must be asked about any pertaining
    risks e.g. pre-existing mental conditions
  • Participants must have the right/means to contact
    the researcher should risks/harm be incurred at a
    later point
  • Participants must be given the right to decline
    enquiries of a personal/sensitive nature
  • Care must be exercised when discussing the
    results of children with parents/caregivers

33
Observational Research/Advice
  • Observational Research must only be conducted
    where behaviour would ordinarily be observed by
    the general public
  • Additionally, particular account should be taken
    of local cultural values, and of the possibility
    of intruding upon the privacy of individuals, who
    even while in a normally public space, may
    believe they are unobserved.

34
Observational Research/Advice cont
  • Giving Advice If info is gained that may affect
    the participants future well being, the
    researcher must inform the participant
  • If belatedly advice is sought by the participant
    and the researcher is not qualified to offer
    assistance, the researcher should offer
    assistance as to the appropriate professional
    source
  • Advice may be given if it relates to the research
    and was pre-agreed at the outset

35
Additional Ethical points concerned with covert
participant observation
  • Involves deception
  • May involve lack of consent (see notes)
  • May be difficult to keep confidentiality and
    anonymity
  • The researcher may have ethical dilemmas e.g. if
    law breaking is taking place. Do they report it,
    and break their cover, or go along with it?

36
Colleagues
  • Researchers have a shared
  • obligation to ensure that
  • ethical guidelines are
  • adhered to. Should a doubt
  • occur then researchers
  • should encourage an
  • investigator to revaluate
  • their research.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com