Title: Freedom of Speech, Press, and Assembly
1Freedom of Speech, Press, and Assembly
- Combined we know these freedoms as our freedom of
expression
2Fundamental importance of our Freedom of
Expression
- Guarantee each person the right of free
expression so that a wide range of public affairs
can be discussed. - The right of expression was intended to protect
unpopular views---Supreme Court Justice Oliver
Wendell Holmes described it this way freedom
for the thought we hate---He said majority
opinions need little or no Constitutional
protection. - Do you agree with him???????????
3Types of Expression that are not protected
- 1. Obscene words and materials (but what is
obscene?) - 2. Words that prompt others to commit a crime.
(Charles Manson---Huey Newton) - Slippery slope because belief can not be
punishedonly actions. - 3. Slander and libelspoken and written words
that are false and cause harm to another person. - slander deals with spoken words
- libel deals with written words
- 4. Student speech can be restricted at school.
4Slander and Libel
- Can public officials recover damages for
published criticisms that are false, and or
exaggerated??????? - No, unless the published article was made with
malicious intent - NY Times v. Sullivan 1964
- Malicious intent would be defined as knowing
something is false but printing it anyway so that
you could purposefully harm someone.
5Can a public figure (movie star, sports star,
Television Evangelist) recover damages () when
they are made fun of in a false and unkind manner
by a publication?
- In almost every instance No, Hustler Magazine v.
Falwell 1988 - Falwell won his case in a lower federal court
right here in Roanokebut the decision was
overturned by the Supreme Court.
6Seditious Speech
- Defined as advocating, or urging the overthrow of
the government by force or to disrupt its lawful
activities by violent acts. - 1798 Alien and Sedition Acts
- Gave Federalist President Adams the power to
deport aliens. It also made any false,
scandalous, and malicious criticism of the
government a crime. - Law was meant to quiet Anti-Federalist criticism
of the President. - 25 persons arrested---10 convicted
- all pardoned by Jefferson when he became
President.
7The Sedition Act of 1917
- Passed during World War I ---made it a crime to
encourage disloyalty, interfere with the draft,
obstruct recruitment, incite insubordination in
the armed service, or hinder the sale of
government bonds. - Also to willfully utter, print, write, or
publish any disloyal, profane, scurrilous or
abusive language about the government of the
United States. - 2000 persons convicted under law.
8Constitutionality of 1917 Sedition Act questioned
- Can a member of the Socialist Party distribute
leaflets which urged men to resist the
draft????????????? - No, Schenk v. U.S. 1919
- Justice Holmes spoke for the majority of the
court. He said words can be outlawed, and those
who say them can be punished, when the words
trigger an immediate danger that criminal acts
will follow. - Becomes known as the Clear and Present Danger
Doctrine. - How was the distribution of these leaflets a
clear and present danger?
91940 Smith Act
- Law made it a crime to advocate the violent
overthrow of the government, to distribute any
material that teaches or advises violent
overthrow, or to knowingly belong to any group
with such aim. - Does membership in the Communist Party violate
this law? - In 1951 the Supreme Court said yes and allowed
the conviction of a person who was a member of
the Communist Party under the Smith Act to stand.
- However, in 1957 they changed their mind and
said to merely urge someone to believe something
cannot be made illegaltoday a person can be a
member of the Communist Party if they want. In
fact Communist have sometimes been elected to
public office.
10Obscenity
- The first and fourteenth amendment do not protect
obscenity. However, defining what is obscene is
been very difficult. - In 1957 The Supreme Court upheld a law passed by
Congress which made it a federal crime to use the
mail to transport obscene materials.
11How do you define whats obscene???????????????
- 1973 Miller v. California Supreme Court creates
three part test for obscenity. - 1. The average person applying community
standards finds the work appealing to only
prurient interest. - 2. The work depicts or describes a form of sexual
conduct dealt with in antiobscenity law. - 3. The work lacks serious literary, artistic,
political, or scientific value
12Can a city regulate the location of adult
entertainment?
- Yes, Young v. American Mini Theaters 1976
- Can the Federal and State government make it a
crime to possess, view, or transport through the
mail child pornography??? - Yes, Osborne v. Ohio 1990
- Can a city ban taverns, bars, and clubs that
feature nude dancing? - Yes, City of Erie v. Paps AM 2000
13Review for Part 1 Quiz
- What was the viewpoint of Oliver Wendell Holmes
concerning Freedom of Expression? - What types of expression are not protected?
- Be able to define slander, libel, and malicious
intent, and seditious speech - What happened in the Hustler Magazine vs. Falwell
case? - Be able to describe the 1798 Alien and Sedition
Act Sedition Act of 1917 1940 Smith Act - Is the transportation of obscene material
illegal? - What was the three part test established by
Miller vs. California? - Can a city regulate the location of adult
entertainment? - What happened in the Skokie case?
14Review Continued
- What are the three legal methods by which
governments may limit the right to peacefully
assemble? - Who was Joseph McCarthy?
- From what sources will you find the origin of our
right of assembly and petition? - Why does the Supreme Court say that Americans
have a right to associate with whom they wish
even though the right to association is not found
in the Constitution?
15Does the News Media have an Agenda?
- Lead in on ABC news radio to Va. Tech shooting
story - in a part of Virginia where hunting is
popular and guns are common - Is the reporter trying to imply something?
- What?
- Is this fair and appropriate reporting?
16Censorship
- The Constitution allows the government to punish
someone for their expression after it is made
However, can government stop the expression
before it is made???? - This is called Prior Restraint or Censorship
- The Supreme Court has said that the general rule
is that with almost no exception can government
place prior restraint on expression.
17Can the state of Minnesota stop the printing of
an anti-Semitic (anti-Jewish) newspaper?No,
1931 Near v. MinnesotaCensorship can only be
used in extreme cases such as wartime, obscenity,
or incitation to violence.
18Presumption of unconstitutionality
- Today, any case coming before the Federal Courts,
that deals with government censorship, is
considered unconstitutional upon arrival, and it
is up to the government to explain why there
should be an exception.
19Pentagon Papers Case
- 1971 N.Y. Times v. United States
- A document known as The History of U.S. decision
making process on Vietnam Policy was stolen from
the Pentagon. - The document was labeled Top Secret.
- It was given to the N.Y. Times and they wanted to
print it. The U.S. Government objected and
attempted to stop the printing. - The Supreme Court sided with the N.Y. Times
because the government could not prove that
National Security was endangered.
20Censorship/Prior Restraint that has been judged
Constitutional
- Regulations limiting distributions of political
materials on a military base. - Regulation that required retired CIA agents to
first get the permission of the CIA before
publishing anything about the CIA. - Regulation in federal prison that allows
officials to prevent an inmate from receiving
certain publications. - School officials can censor school newspapers and
plays.
21Can reporters be forced to testify in a court of
law about information they might have uncovered
involving a criminal case?
- Reporters claim that they should not because they
are protected by the First Amendments Freedom of
the Press. (Valarie Plame case) - The Supreme Court has disagreed and says that
like other citizens reporters must respond to
relevant questions. - Thirty states have passed Shield Laws to give
reporters limited protection in state courts.
However, no such protection exist in Federal
Court.
22Radio and Television
- In 1934 the Congress passed the Federal
Communications Act. Since that time radio and
television have been subject to extensive
regulation from the Federal Communications
Commission (one of many federal regulatory
commissions or agencies). - The Supreme Court has said that Broadcasting
over the airways receives the least of protection
from the 1st. Amendment. - Why? What makes television and radio different
from newspapers and magazines? - Television and Radio broadcast over the public
airways. - Pay cable channels have more first amendment
freedom. U.S. V Playboy Entertainment 2000 - Supreme Court declares law unconstitutional.
23FCC regulates television and radio
- CBS was fined 500,000 by the FCC for allowing
the Janet Jackson wardrobe malfunction to happen
during half time of the 2004 Super Bowl. - Howard Stern and the radio stations that have his
program have been fined by the FCC.
24Symbolic SpeechExpression by Conduct
- Can school systems have dress codes or school
uniforms? - Yeshowever, the rules should reflect their
clothes not their personal appearance. Personal
appearance items like piercing, hair color, and
hair length can not be regulated unless it
presents a health threat.
25Picketing as symbolic speech
- Can workers patrol a business site and protest
working conditions and pay? - Yes, as long as it is peaceful and does not block
access to the business.
26Free Speech and the workplace
- Can a police officer, on his own time, provide a
web site that offers visitors a strip tease for a
certain amount of money. (Officer starts with his
police uniform on) - The police department warned the police officer
and when he refused to stop he was fired. - No, the Supreme Court unanimously found that the
police officers actions were detrimental to the
mission and function of the employer.
27The flag and free speech
- Can the federal, state, or local government make
it a crime to burn the flag in protest or show
disrespect to the flag in any manner? - NoProtected action by first amendment
- There has been some talk about adding an
amendment to the Constitution to make burning the
flag a crime.
28Political Contributions and free speech
- Can the federal, state, or local government
regulate a persons political donations? - (how much, when, make them public)
- Yes, but in a very limited manner.
29Commercial Speech
- You may not advertise illegal goods
- You may not advertise falsely or in a misleading
manner.
30Can the Boy Scouts (a private organization)
exclude homosexuals from their organization?
- Yes---they are a private organization and
therefore have what is called freedom of
association which is a form of expression.
31Can a school system punish students for wearing
black armbands as a form of protest against
government actions?
- No
- Protected by 1st. Amendment