140GHz Gyroklystron Design Progress - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

140GHz Gyroklystron Design Progress

Description:

Uptaper length and radius. 5 cavity radii, 5 cavity lengths, 5 cavity ohmic Q's 1 diffractive Q. 4 drift lengths, 1 drift space radius. Input power and input ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:104
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: jagad3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 140GHz Gyroklystron Design Progress


1
140GHz Gyroklystron Design Progress Colin
Joye Plasma Science and Fusion Center Massachusett
s Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA
02139 July 8, 2004
2
GKL design goals
  • Power 100 W CW output from the tube.
  • 3dB bandwidth of 1 GHz.
  • Current MAGY results at
  • 4 perp. velocity spread
  • 130 W
  • 1.0 GHz of 3dB BW
  • 1.3 GHz at 50 watts

3
Block Diagram
4
Why GKL design is so hard
  • There are around 30 independent parameters
  • Beam voltage, beam current, beam alpha
  • Magnetic field, velocity spread value
  • Uptaper length and radius
  • 5 cavity radii, 5 cavity lengths, 5 cavity ohmic
    Qs 1 diffractive Q
  • 4 drift lengths, 1 drift space radius
  • Input power and input frequency
  • Optimization stumbling blocks
  • Oversaturation too much gain over a particular
    frequency range
  • Frequency pulling which cavity is the cause?
  • Each parameter contributes something to the whole
    spectrum

5
GKL Design Parameters
  • 5 Cavities
  • V0 15 kV
  • I0 0.15 A
  • a 1.5
  • Perp. velocity spread 4
  • Input power 25mW
  • B0 51.4 0.1 kG
  • Now lets see some graphs!............

6
Cavity shape
7
Output cavity
Cold Cavity Code predicts a nice waveform f0
140.534 GHz Qdiff 358
8
Input power variation (1/9)
Input power variations show good
behavior. Design values give 130 W peak 1.0
GHz 3dB BW 1.3 GHz at 50W
9
Gain vs. input power (2/9)
The gain shows good behavior at all input
powers. Linear gain is 39dB Design value gain is
37dB
10
Beam current variation (3/9)
Power can be increased using I0 at the expense of
3dB BW. BW _at_ 50W goes up, though!
11
Pitch factor variation (4/9)
Pitch factor is sensitive, but can be compensated
by I0. BW _at_ 50W decreases with decreasing a.
12
v? spread variation (5/9)
This design is robust up to 6 perp vel sprd.
13
Beam voltage variation (6/9)
As predicted by linear theory, the gain generally
decreases with increasing voltage. Low voltage
is good for gain but bad for space charge.
14
Magnetic field variation (7/9)
  • Even over a B0 deviation of 0.4, over 1 GHz of
    BW is available at 50W.
  • Magnexs spec of 0.1ppm/hr Adjust the magnet
    every 5 years!

15
Electric field profile (8/9)
The field profile looks fairly clean. The output
profile will change slightly after a non-linear
taper is designed.
16
Short pulse shape (9/9)
The short pulse behavior is quite good. Pulse
turn-on and turn-off delays 1ns
17
Tuning sensitivity
  • The cavities need to be tuned to within 50 to 100
    MHz.
  • Electroforming gives a tolerance of 0.2 mils, or
    300 MHz.
  • We need a way to accurately tune the structure
    a 140 GHz VNA (hint hint) and maybe a
    Haimson-approved premium gold-plated hammer.

18
Conclusion
  • The present GKL circuit design seems solid.
  • Still to do
  • Nonlinear uptaper to minimize mode conversion
  • MIG design
  • Mode converter (TE02 to TE01) and input coupler
  • Purchase RF source
  • Evaluate PBG?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com