Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade CLAS12 SVT review

1
Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade CLAS12 SVT review

Latifa Elouadrhiri Hall B 12 GeV Control Account
Manager
Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade, CLAS12 SVT
review Jefferson Lab April 2, 2008
2
Outline

• Introduction
• WBS Structure
• Organization Infrastructure
• Cost Schedule
• RD Tasks
• Risk Mitigation
• Project tracking and reviews
• Summary

3
CLAS12 Requirements
The 12 GeV physics program requires measurement
of exclusive reactions. At high energies cross
sections are small and high energy particles are
produced in the forward direction. The physics
program requires

• High operating luminosity of 1035 cm-2sec-1
• Small angle capabilities for charged and neutral
  particle detection
• Particle ID to higher momentum (e-/p-, p/K/p,
  g/po)
• More complete detection of hadronic final state

4
CLAS12 - Detector
5
CLAS12 Central Detector
Time-of-Flight
Silicon Vertex Tracker
Solenoid
6
Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade WBS
7
Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade WBS Structure
WBS 1.4.2 Hall B
WBS 1.4.2.2 Detectors
WBS 1.4.2.1 SC Magnet
WBS 1.4.2.1.1 Toroidal Magnet
WBS 1.4.2.2.1 Tracking
WBS 1.4.2.2.2 Calorimeter
WBS 1.4.2.2.3 Time of Flight
WBS 1.4.2.2.4 Cherenkov
WBS 1.4.2.1.2 Solenoid Magnet
WBS 1.4.2.2.1.1 Silicon Vertex Tracker
WBS 1.4.2.2.3.1 Central TOF
WBS 1.4.2.2.4.1 High Threshold CC
WBS 1.4.2.2.4.2 Low Threshold CC
WBS 1.4.2.2.1.3 Tracking Forward Drift Chambers
WBS 1.4.2.2.2.3 Forward Calorimeter
WBS 1.4.2.2.3.2 Forward TOF
WBS 1.4.2.5 Beamline
WBS 1.4.2.3 Computing
WBS 1.4.2.4 Electronics
WBS 1.4.2.6 Infrastructure
WBS 1.4.2.3.2 DAQ
WBS 1.4.2.3.1 Trigger System
WBS 1.4.2.4.2 TDC
WBS 1.4.2.4.1 ADC
WBS 1.4.2.5.2 Moller Polarimeter Upgrade
WBS 1.4.2.5.1 Faraday Cup Upgrade
WBS 1.4.2.6.2 Mechanical Frames
WBS 1.4.2.6.1 Utilities
WBS 1.4.2.3.3 Online Computing
WBS 1.4.2.3.4 Offline Computing
WBS 1.4.2.4.3 Scalers
WBS 1.4.2.4.4 High Voltage
WBS 1.4.2.6.3 Assembly
WBS 1.4.2.6.4 Installation
WBS 1.4.2.5.4 Components
WBS 1.4.2.3.5 Slow Controls
WBS 1.4.2.4.7 Crates, Racks
8
Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade WBS Structure
WBS 1.4.2 Hall B
WBS 1.4.2.2 Detectors
WBS 1.4.2.1 SC Magnet
WBS 1.4.2.1.1 Toroidal Magnet
WBS 1.4.2.2.1 Tracking
WBS 1.4.2.2.2 Calorimeter
WBS 1.4.2.2.3 Time of Flight
WBS 1.4.2.2.4 Cherenkov
WBS 1.4.2.1.2 Solenoid Magnet
WBS 1.4.2.2.1.1 Silicon Vertex Tracker
WBS 1.4.2.2.3.1 Central TOF
WBS 1.4.2.2.4.1 High Threshold CC
WBS 1.4.2.2.4.2 Low Threshold CC
WBS 1.4.2.2.1.3 Tracking Forward Drift Chambers
WBS 1.4.2.2.2.3 Forward Calorimeter
WBS 1.4.2.2.3.2 Forward TOF
WBS 1.4.2.5 Beamline
WBS 1.4.2.3 Computing
WBS 1.4.2.4 Electronics
WBS 1.4.2.6 Infrastructure
WBS 1.4.2.3.2 DAQ
WBS 1.4.2.3.1 Trigger System
WBS 1.4.2.4.2 TDC
WBS 1.4.2.4.1 ADC
WBS 1.4.2.5.2 Moller Polarimeter Upgrade
WBS 1.4.2.5.1 Faraday Cup Upgrade
WBS 1.4.2.6.2 Mechanical Frames
WBS 1.4.2.6.1 Utilities
WBS 1.4.2.3.3 Online Computing
WBS 1.4.2.3.4 Offline Computing
WBS 1.4.2.4.3 Scalers
WBS 1.4.2.4.4 High Voltage
WBS 1.4.2.6.3 Assembly
WBS 1.4.2.6.4 Installation
WBS 1.4.2.5.4 Components
WBS 1.4.2.3.5 Slow Controls
WBS 1.4.2.4.7 Crates, Racks
9
Hall B Upgrade Project Organization
10
Hall B Group and Collaboration

• Experienced staff in place
• Staff scientists (17)
• Engineering and technical staff (21 )
• senior engineer, 2 mechanical engineers,
  electrical engineer, Hall coordinator, 5 detector
  technicians, 3 mechanical technicians,
• 3 electrical technicians, 5 designers
• 60 of staff scientists were involved in original
  project,
• 80 of technical staff.
• Size of collaboration (more than 200)
• 28 US institutions
• 11 Foreign institutions (Armenia, France, Italy,
  Russia, S. Korea, UK)

11
CLAS12 - Institutions

• Institution Focus Area
• Arizona State University (US) Beamline,
  Tagging System
• Argonne National Laboratory (US) Cerenkov
  Counter
• California State University (US) Cerenkov
  Counters
• Catholic University of America (US) Reconstruc
  tion Software
• College of William Mary (US) Magnet Mapping
• Edinburgh University (UK) Software
• Fairfield University (US) Polarized Target
• Florida International University, Miaimi
  (US) Beamline/Moller polarimeter
• Glasgow University (UK) Online, Data
  Acquisition
• Hampton University (US) Central Tracking
• Idaho State University (US) Drift chambers
• INFN Frascati (Italy) Central Detector
• INFN Genova (Italy) Cental Detector
• Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics
  (Russia) SC. Magnets, Simulations
• James Madison University (US) Calorimetry
• Kyungpook National University (Republic of
  Korea) CD TOF
• Kurchatov Institute Moscow (Russia) SC
  Solenoid
• Los Alamos National Laboratory (US) Silicon
  Tracke

12
CLAS12 - Institutions

• Institution Focus Area
• Arizona State University (US) Beamline,
  Tagging System
• Argonne National Laboratory (US) Cerenkov
  Counter
• California State University (US) Cerenkov
  Counters
• Catholic University of America (US) Reconstruc
  tion Software
• College of William Mary (US) Magnet Mapping
• Edinburgh University (UK) Software
• Fairfield University (US) Polarized Target
• Florida International University, Miaimi
  (US) Beamline/Moller polarimeter
• Glasgow University (UK) Online, Data
  Acquisition
• Hampton University (US) Central Tracking
• Idaho State University (US) Drift chambers
• INFN Frascati (Italy) Central Detector
• INFN Genova (Italy) Cental Detector
• Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics
  (Russia) SC. Magnets, Simulations
• James Madison University (US) Calorimetry
• Kyungpook National University (Republic of
  Korea) CD TOF
• Kurchatov Institute Moscow (Russia) SC
  Solenoid
• Los Alamos National Laboratory (US) Silicon
  Tracke

MOUs are being developed
13
Hall B Status

• Facilities still in place
• Fabrication and assembly space in EEL building
  and Test Lab
• Large class 10,000 clean room for wire chamber
  stringing
• Collaborating institutions will provide
  substantial fabrication assembly facilities
• Procedures and Policies in place
• EHS, Safety documents for operations
• Special safety reviews for new equipment (EHS
  Manual)
• Conduct of Operations document
• Readiness Reviews for new experiments
• Operating experience with the present CLAS
• World leader in operating Large Acceptance
  Detectors in high luminosity electron scattering
  environment
• Experience with 3 different superconducting
  magnets (Torus, Solenoid, Helmholtz magnets)
• Implemented numerous incremental upgrades of
  detectors and ancillary equipment

14
12 GeV Cost Summary
15
Experimental Equipment Cost
1.4.2.2.1.1 SVT Cost 2, 846

16
DOE Generic Project Timeline
Nov 2007
17
12 GeV UPGRADE SCHEDULE
18
HALL B WBS 1.1.3, 1.2.2.2 1.4.2
19
HALL B WBS 1.1.3, 1.2.2.2 1.4.2
SVT PED
SVT Construction
20
Construction Hall B Risk Management
Risk Assessment Matrix
The Overall risk of the Hall B subsystems 1.4.2.3
1.4.2.6 is LOW JLab Staff experienced with
similar detector design and construction during
the original construction of Hall-B Moderate
risk for one detector element (SVT) and two
magnets Lack of in-house experience with SVT
detector technology Low likelihood but high
impact on technical and cost performance of
CLAS12 magnets
21
Hall B Risk Management

• Silicon Vertex Tracker (SVT) considered
  moderate risk due to limited expertise at JLab
  with this technology.
• Mitigation
• Attracted SiLab Group at Moscow State University
  as collaborating member with broad expertise in
  Silicon Detector Technology (D0, ZEUS, PHENIX,
  TESLA)
• Close monitoring and coordination of vendor
• Bi-weekly phone conferences of technical teams
• Mutual visits
• Documentation Technical Design Report
• Hall B Instrumentation Group developed in-house
  expertise in SVT readout electronics and
  interface with CODA

22
RD and Simulation Tasks
23
Hall B Design Reviews

• DOE-convened reviews
• Earned Value Management System Review December
  2007
• External Independent Project Review September
  2007
• Independent Project Review June 2007
• Independent Project Review June 2006
• Independent Project Review July 2005
• JLab-convened reviews
• Particle ID Detector Review - April 2007
• High Threshold Cerenkov
• Preshower Calorimeter
• Drift Chamber Review - March 2007
• Superconducting Magnet Review - September 2006
• Program Advisory Committee (PAC 32) - August 2007
• Program Advisory Committee (PAC 30) - August 2006
• Hall-B-convened reviews
• Third CLAS12 Workshop Detector Review- May 2007
• CLAS12 RICH Detector Workshop - May 2007
• Second CLAS12 Workshop Detector Review- May 2007
• SVT Review - March 2007

24
Hall B Upcoming Design Reviews

• DOE-convened reviews
• Independent Project Review July 22- 24, 2008
• JLab-convened reviews
• Silicon Vertex tracker Review April 2, 2008
• Superconducting Magnet Review April 15-17, 2008
• Complete CLAS12 Detector Review May 15, 2008
• Program Advisory Committee (PAC 34) December
  2008
• Hall-B-convened reviews
• Fourth CLAS12 Workshop Detector Review- May 2008

25
Recommendation Tracker

• 05 IPR-24IPR Sec 2.5 (Detector)
• Advance the conceptual design of the CLAS12 SVT
  and provide more engineering details.
• Conceptual design has been significantly
  advanced. Many more engineering details are
  known for the design.
• 05 IPR-25IPR Sec 2.5 (Detector)
• Study the CLAS 12 SVT conceptual design via
  simulation.
• Conceptual design has been refined as a
  result of simulation studies. Reference for
  these studies is CLAS-NOTE-2006-020.
• 06 IPR -09 Detector
• Conduct external peer reviews of Hall B and
  D detector designs and of superconducting magnet
  designs in time to impact the baseline designs of
  these subsystems.
• An external peer review of the Hall B (and
  C) superconducting magnets took place in
  September 2006. An external peer review of the
  Hall D and Hall B drift chambers in March 2007.
  In April 2007, the Hall B preshower calorimeter
  and high threshold Cerenkov Counter were reviewed
  by an external panel. Review committee reports
  from all of the above are included in the
  pre-brief material.

26
Recommendation Tracker

• 06 IPR -08Detector
• Continue development of full detector
  simulation and reconstruction studies with the
  goal of validating that detector designs meet
  physics performance requirements for Halls B and
  D.
• In Hall B a focus group has developed a
  GEANT simulation including all CLAS12 detectors
  and magnets. Reconstruction software had been
  developed for nearly all detectors as of April
  2007. This simulation and reconstruction effort
  will continue throughout the lifetime of the
  project, however excellent progress has been made
  to verify that the design meets physics
  performance parameters.
• 07 IPR -18Detectors
• Advance the design of the Hall B SVT.
  Complete choice of readout IC and engineering
  design of module by CD-3.
• Work in Progress Will be done prior to
  CD-3 IPR.

27
Summary

• The technical scope of the Hall B upgrade with
  CLAS12 is well matched to the performance
  requirements
• Major portions of the project scope are based on
  existing technology
• Overall technical risks are low
• Moderate risk for SVT due to the Lack of
  in-house experience with SVT detector technology
• Utilize many components of CLAS and the Hall B
  infrastructure
• A strong and growing collaboration
• Planning is sound and based on the broad
  previous experience of the scientific and
  technical teams of Hall B and the Collaboration
• Basic design parameters are well understood
• PED effort is well advanced in all areas
• Experienced staff is in place with an excellent
  track record on the construction, operation, and
  incremental upgrades of the Hall B equipment