converting dBcmMHz to Nepers - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

converting dBcmMHz to Nepers

Description:

converting dBcmMHz to Nepers – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:93
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: gene51
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: converting dBcmMHz to Nepers


1
converting dB/cm/MHz to Nepers
  • another common attenuation value for tissue is
    0.5 dB/cm/MHz
  • Q For this attenuation value, what is the
    attenuation in Nepers for a plane wave that
    propagates a distance of 5cm at 500kHz?
  • .5 dB/cm/MHz 5cm .5MHz 1.25dB
  • A 1.25dB / (8.7dB/Np) 0.1437 Np
  • verify 20 log10(exp(- 0.1437 Np))
  • -1.25dB

2
converting dB/cm/MHz to Nepers
  • Q Using the same attenuation as before, what is
    the intensity of a plane wave after propagating a
    distance of 5cm at 500kHz if the initial
    intensity is 5W/cm2?
  • A1 5W/cm2 exp (- 2 0.1437 Np) 3.75
    W/cm2
  • A2 5W/cm2 10(-1.25/10) 3.75 W/cm2

3
converting dB/cm/MHz to Nepers
  • Exercise verify that an attenuation of
    5.75x10-8Np/cm/Hz is the same as 0.5dB/cm/MHz

4
Resonance in pipes
  • recall that for plane wave, planar boundary,
    normal incidence, (6.2.7 in book)
  • These equations are the same as 10.2.2

5
Radiation Impedance
  • impedance seen by wave emanating from a pipe is
    the radiation impedance (think optics where a
    plane wave incident on a slit - plane wave on the
    left, diffraction pattern on the right)
  • for a circular pipe, this is roughly the same as
    that for a circular piston (use the low frequency
    limit)

6
Radiation impedance
  • recall also that the radiation impedance is
    defined as the ratio between the force and the
    particle velocity
  • use this expression for the impedance not only
    outside of the pipe, but inside as well, so
    and

7
Input impedance
  • similar approach to derivation in sections 6.2
    and 6.3 (continuity of specific normal impedance)
  • combine expressions and obtain

8
Radiation impedance -flanged opening
  • flanged (baffled piston in the low frequency
    limit)
  • see derivation on p. 274
  • resonance frequency closed pipe w/ rigid cap is
    f(n) (n c) / (2 L)

effective length is therefore L L .85a
9
Radiation impedance -unflanged opening
  • no longer represented by baffled piston
  • resonance frequency closed pipe w/ rigid cap is
    f(n) (n c) / (2 L)

effective length is therefore L L .6a
10
Power transmission from pipes -flanged vs.
unflanged
  • details on p. 275 (section 10.3)
  • low frequency limit
  • flanged
  • unflanged
  • flange doubles the output power - result of
    better impedance match

11
Pipes as filters (mufflers)
  • sections 10.10 and 10.11
  • junctions
  • branches
  • design filter based on equivalent lumped models
    for L and C

12
Exponential Horn (loudspeaker)
  • acoustic transformer
  • provides an even better impedance match than a
    flanged pipe
  • some details on p. 414 (section 14.7)

13
Helmholtz Resonator (10.8)
  • open end radiates - need to include radiation
    resistance (acts as a mass)
  • fluid in neck - provides additional mass
  • cavity - compression of fluid in here provides
    stiffness
  • square root of stiffness divided by mass -
    natural frequency

14
Helmholtz Resonator - Assumptions
  • wavelength is much greater than the cube root of
    the volume (V) of the cavity
  • wavelength is much greater than the square root
    of the area (S) of the opening
  • wavelength is much greater than the length (L) of
    the neck
  • more details provided on p.284, section 10.8

15
Effective length of the neck (includes radiation
resistance), where a is the radius of the
neck
  • L L (.85 .85)a L 1.7a,
  • when the outer end is flanged (inside, where
    neck attaches to cavity is always assumed to be
    flanged)
  • L L (.6 .85)a L 1.45a,
  • when the outer end is unflanged (inside, where
    neck attaches to cavity is again assumed to be
    flanged)

16
Helmholtz Resonator - Assumptions
  • the total mass (the mass in the plug plus the
    radiation mass) is equal to the density times the
    volume, so
  • m r0 S L
  • stiffness is (see derivation in book)
  • s r0 c2 S2 / V
  • resonant frequency is then

17
Helmholtz Resonator - Example
  • 2 liter bottle
  • f 343 / 2 / pi
  • sqrt(pi / 4 (2.1e-2)2 / (4e-2 1.45
    1.05e-2)/ (2e3 (1e-2)3 ))
  • f 96.67Hz

18
Helmholtz Resonator - 2 liter
19
Helmholtz Resonator - 500ml bottle
  • f 343 / 2 / pi
  • sqrt(pi / 4 (2.1e-2)2 / (2.8e-2 1.45
    1.05e-2)/ (500 (1e-2)3 ))
  • f 218 Hz

20
Helmholtz Resonator - 739ml bottle
  • f 343 / 2 / pi
  • sqrt(pi / 4 (2.1e-2)2 / (2.8e-2 1.45
    1.05e-2)/ (739 (1e-2)3 ))
  • f 180 Hz

21
f 110 exp((i/12) ln(2))
  • A - 110.0000 Hz
  • A - 116.5409
  • B - 123.4708
  • C - 130.8128
  • C - 138.5913
  • D - 146.8324
  • D - 155.5635
  • E - 164.8138
  • F - 174.6141
  • F - 184.9972
  • G - 195.9977
  • G - 207.6523

22
f 220 2(i/12)
  • A - 220 hz
  • A - 233.0818808
  • B - 246.9416506
  • C - 261.6255653
  • C - 277.182631
  • D - 293.6647679
  • D - 311.1269837
  • E - 329.6275569
  • F - 349.2282314
  • F - 369.9944227
  • G - 391.995436
  • G - 415.3046976
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com