Accounting for Investors

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Accounting for Investors

Description:

Technical analysis was deemed useless. Strong form: insider information? ... Some sad facts. Most managers don't believe in efficiency ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: MichaelF5

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Accounting for Investors


1
Accounting for Investors
2
The Economy (SFAC 1)
  • Private businesses dominate
  • Managed by professionals not owners
  • Owners need reports on their investment
  • Hence the income statement
  • FASB says only one general-purpose statement is
    needed
  • Intended primarily for owners
  • Others can read it -- if they want!

3
Stakeholders versus shareholders
  • Many people other than owners need info
  • Banks, suppliers, employees, government
  • Perhaps a value added statement would be better
  • NI Revenue - cost of goods - wages - interest -
    tax
  • Value added Revenue - cost of goods
  • Value added Wages interest tax net income
    (profit)
  • Perhaps a variety of statements would be better
  • Contribution-type statements for managers

4
Capital markets
  • Accountants role
  • Enabling investors to buy sell is not enough
  • That is a zero sum game for the economy
  • Must enable effective resource allocation
  • With good information the economy grows
  • But, who knows whether we do that . . .
  • Then the computer arrived!!!
  • Center for Research into Security Prices (CRSP)

5
Academics hit it rich?!
  • Academics unable to make a killing
  • Puzzled and disappointed
  • No investment strategy worked consistently
  • Abnormal profits were not attainable
  • Ordinary profits were very attainable though
  • Discovered
  • Price changes are uncorrelated
  • Prices follow a random walk

6
Efficient markets
  • All available information is impounded in stock
    prices
  • Market behaves AS IF all available information is
    impounded in stock prices
  • Weak form all prior prices are impounded
  • Technical analysis was deemed useless
  • Strong form insider information?
  • If only we had the inside scoop -- and jail did
    not call
  • One role of accounting is to reduce insider info

7
Semi-strong efficiency
  • Is the market efficient with respect to all
    publicly available information?
  • The Ball Brown experiment
  • If we knew a year in advance
  • Go long if NI goes up
  • Go short if NI goes down
  • Money to be made up to the point of disclosure
  • Market is not strong efficient
  • Market is semi-strong efficient

8
Implications
  • Fundamental analysis is worthless
  • Dont bother to read annual reports!!
  • Other sources of financial information exist
  • Annual reports are anticipated
  • Markets will choose the cheapest source
  • Cheap f(time, energy, difficulty, money)
  • Markets are sophisticated - no functional
    fixation
  • We can produce reports for the well-educated
  • Markets are set on the margin by the active
    investor
  • Be a couch potato -- you are protected
  • The price is always right!

9
One outcome
  • All financial assets are marked to market
  • If available for sale, unrealized gains and
    losses go to other comprehensive income
  • If (actively) traded, unrealized gains and losses
    go to net income
  • Both end up in comprehensive income
  • Initially FASB wanted them to be at a 3-year
    moving average -- shouted down!

10
Portfolio theory
  • Harry Markowitz
  • Diversification reduces risk
  • Adding uncorrelated securities reduces the
    variance to the covariance beta
  • Efficient portfolio curve
  • Maximum return for a given risk
  • Minimum risk for a given return
  • Advice
  • All investors should buy the market

11
So whence efficiency?
  • If everyone
  • Ignores annual reports
  • Buys the market
  • Is a couch potato
  • Then how does the market become efficient?
  • Answer appears to be stupidity
  • Stupid people will waste their time and money
    trying to make a killing -- and we benefit?!

12
Market model
  • Bill Sharpe (Markowitz protegee)
  • Demonstrates that one can do even better
  • Buy the market and ride the market line by using
    debt
  • Capital asset pricing model (CAPM)
  • Expected return combo of risk-free rate, the
    beta of the stock and the market return
  • No return for bearing unsystematic risk
  • Cf the Andersen partner whose pension was with AA

13
Role of accounting
  • To enable investors and others to predict . . .
  • The companys beta!!!
  • No cash flow here!!
  • Currently no effort to meet this goal.

14
CAPM research
  • CAPM measures the true return
  • Actual return - true return abnormal return
  • Abnormal return f(experiment)
  • Ball Brown
  • If we knew in advance we could earn an abnormal
    return
  • That abnormal return goes away once the annual
    report is published -- all publicly available
    information has been impounded

15
Dozens of experiments since
  • Would knowing this in advance enable us to make
    an abnormal profit?
  • For example, could we make an abnormal profit
    from knowing that these companies are using
    straight-line and those are using accelerated
    depreciation
  • Answer is invariably no -- the market
    understands
  • However, a growing number of anomalies

16
Earnings behavior
  • If prices follow a random walk, what about
    accounting earnings I.e., net income
  • Turns out that NI is also pretty close to a
    random walk
  • With nothing more to say this line of research
    has died down

17
Valuation models
  • If we know the book value of a company can we
    figure out its market value?
  • What if we know the replacement cost of its
    assets?
  • If we know the accounting earnings of a company
    can we figure out is market value?
  • Can we take a PE ratio x EPS?
  • Can we use the fact that E/P interest rate?

18
Some sad facts
  • Most managers dont believe in efficiency
  • The FASB by and large ignores efficiency
  • The FASB has to set rules
  • This requires making value judgments
  • Most academics want to stay value neutral
  • Academia thus has little to add to rule setting
  • Companies raise very little equity money
  • SOX may change corporate governance
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)