Title: Current and Future Challenges in Diabetes Prevention, Diagnosis
1State DPCP Funding A Legislative Priority Ivan
K. Lanier Veronica DeLaGarza Stephen Habbe
2OUR PRIORITIES
- Increase federal and state funding for diabetes
research and programs
Improve insurance coverage and health care for
people with diabetes
End discrimination against people with diabetes
3Federal Funding for Research and Diabetes
Prevention Programs
- A greater federal commitment to diabetes research
and prevention funding is critical in the fight
against diabetes. As such, the American Diabetes
Association continues to lobby Congress and the
Administration to increase funding for diabetes
research at the National Institutes of Health
(NIH) and diabetes treatment and prevention at
the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC).
4Federal Funding for Research and Diabetes
Prevention Programs
- ADA strongly urges the 110th Congress to pass a
new budget that increases NIH diabetes research
funding by 8 percent (148.4 million) and CDC
diabetes prevention and treatment efforts by
20.8 million - one dollar for every American
with diabetes. While these are difficult demands
in the current fiscal environment, where
non-defense dollars are scarce, these numbers
reflect the diabetes burden in the United States.
5Federal Funding for Research and Diabetes
Prevention Programs
- On February 5, 2007, the Bush Administration
announced its budget proposal for Fiscal Year
2008. Rather than heighten the federal investment
in diabetes research and prevention, the
Administrations budget would provide a
less-than-1 percent increase for diabetes
research at NIH and flatten the CDCs diabetes
prevention budget. Federal diabetes funding has
not been increased in four years, where in the
same time frame diabetes prevalence has increased
by nearly 30 percent.
6Federal Funding for Research and Diabetes
Prevention Programs
- The CDCs Division of Diabetes Translation (DDT)
leads the governments effort to provide
comprehensive prevention and treatment programs
in communities throughout the United States. DDT
runs state-based Diabetes Prevention and Control
Programs, which take medical research such as
that sponsored by NIH and translates it into
practices and programs that can be used in local
communities. These programs help those currently
suffering from diabetes better control and manage
the disease and also help those at risk for
diabetes prevent or delay its onset.
Unfortunately, current funding levels only allow
the Division of Diabetes Translation to provide
full support for 28 states.
7States Are Not Funded Equally
ME
WA
MT
ND
VT
MN
NH
OR
NY
MA
WI
ID
SD
MI
CT
R I
WY
PA
NJ
IA
NE
OH
MD
DE
IN
IL
NV
wv
UT
VA
CA
CO
KY
KS
MO
NC
TN
OK
SC
AR
AZ
NM
GA
AL
MS
LA
TX
AK
FL
HI
Basic Implementation Diabetes Prevention
Control Programs Capacity Building Diabetes
Prevention Control Programs
8STATE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS INITIATIVES
- Expand health coverage for diabetes in state
plans and oppose efforts to eliminate or reduce
diabetes coverage - Preserve Medicaid benefits and oppose proposals
to reduce benefits or eligibility - Increase state funding for Diabetes Prevention
and Control Programs - Safe at School Bills Barriers for Students with
Diabetes - Enhance stem cell research and funding
- American Diabetes Association, American Cancer
Society and American Heart Associations
collaboration on physical education in schools
9Diabetes Prevention and Control Program
- Currently all states and territories receive
federal funding for the DPCP. - There are two funding levels capacity and basic
implementation. Capacity-building awards average
of 270,000 to state health departments. These
diabetes prevention and control programs are
involved in developing initial expertise,
providing a focal point, defining the scope of
the problem, identifying gaps in patient access
and quality-of-care issues, identifying external
supporters for diabetes control activities and
limited intervention projects. Basic
implementation awards average of 725,000 to
state health departments. -
10Diabetes Prevention and Control Program
- These diabetes prevention and control programs
build on expertise in program, science, and
policy areas to control and prevent diabetes,
coordinate statewide efforts, expand systems to
define and analyze the scope of the diabetes
problem, improve access to diabetes care for all
people and raise the quality of that care, use
statewide public health projects to reduce
diabetes-related problems, inform, educate, and
empower external supporters to control and
prevent diabetes. CDC funds do require
non-federal matching funds at 1 non-federal for
every 5 federal (capacity) and 1 non-federal
for every 4 federal (basic). Even though the
name was changed to include "prevention" focus
and funding allocation remains diabetes awareness
and prevention of diabetes complications.
11Diabetes Prevention and Control Program
- For approximately the last 9 years, Illinois has
received basic implementation funding in the
range of 900,000. The funds from CDC are the
sole funding source. Matching funds are obtained
through in-kind staff hours and/or donated
materials from partners.
12State Based DPCP Grants
13State Based DPCP Grants
14FUNDING DIABETES CONTROL PROGRAMS
ADA encourages state legislators to increase
funding for the CDC Diabetes Prevention and
Control Programs in their state and to expand
their existing prevention and treatment
efforts. States deemed best able to use new
state resources to expand diabetes prevention and
control activities include Arkansas Californi
a Colorado Florida Idaho Kentucky New
Mexico New York Oklahoma Rhode
Island Texas Vermont Wisconsin
15Diabetes Prevention and Control Program
- The Association is advocating for increased
funding for the CDC Diabetes Prevention and
Control Programs in every state and the District
of Columbia. While at the federal level the
association is focused on protecting and
increasing the amount Congress appropriates to
the CDC for research and prevention, at the state
level the Association is seeking additional
funding from the states to further improve the
infrastructure of theses state-wide programs
whose mission is to prevent and control diabetes. - Arizona On June 16 2006, at midnight, the last
amendment of the night, the Appropriations
Conference Committee Report was amended to
include 1 million dollars for the state DPCP.
The Governor signed this legislation on June 22. - Michigan The Diabetes and Kidney line in the
State Budget was increased by 48,400.00 over
previous FY. - New York ADA was successful in advocating for
increasing the funding that is explicitly
dedicated to the NY Diabetes Prevention and
Control Program. Last year, 149,500 was
provided. This year the budget contains
1,150,500, an increase of 1,001,000.
16(No Transcript)
17 18New York Diabetes Prevention and Control Program
- Variety of Funding Sources (1.6m to 1.9m total)
- CDC
- State appropriation for the program
- MCH funds
- Prevention Block Grant
- Commissioners Priority Pool
- History of State Appropriation
- FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06
- 550,000 148,900 148,900 148,900
19Growing Prevalence and New York Times Series
- Scope of Diabetes in NY
- 1.1 million diagnosed adults and 400,000
undiagnosed adults - NYC estimates 1 in 8 adult city residents have
diabetes - NY Medicaid program covering nearly 300,000 with
diabetes - New York Times Series on Type 2 Diabetes in NYC
(January, 2006) - ADA Advocacy to Boost State Funding
- Information and meetings with Governors office
and legislators - Assembly sign-on letter with 28 members support
- Senator Marcellino took up the cause in the
Senate - ADA advocates weighed in with their legislators
via e-mail - Assembly and Senate both provide additional
funding
20The Result
- Funding Timeline
- FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07
- 550,000 148,900 148,900 148,900 1,149,900
- How The Funds Were Spent
- 50,000 provided to each of 15 community
coalitions for diabetes prevention. Coalition
objectives include - Capacity building/sustainability
- Primary prevention
- Secondary prevention
- Professional education
- Public awareness raising of diabetes risk factors
- Policy, environmental, and systems change
21 22