The American Nuclear Society - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

The American Nuclear Society

Description:

Source: NUS. Fiscal Year. Significant Events. Good News (continued) Besides excellent performance ... Approved. Calvert Cliffs 1,2. Oconee 1,2,3. Arkansas ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:59
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: ameri60
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The American Nuclear Society


1
The American Nuclear Society
  • Status and Future of Nuclear Power in the U. S.
  • Presented to the Foundation for Nuclear Studies
  • by Larry R. Foulke
  • ANS President
  • September 12, 2003

2
Nuclear Power Performance Good News
  • Increased capacity factors
  • Equivalent of 23 new plants
  • Excellent safety record
  • Reductions in OM costs
  • Reductions in radioactive waste
  • Reductions in worker exposures
  • Avoidance of pollution

3
Nuclear Power Performance Good News
  • Increased capacity factors
  • Equivalent of 23 new plants
  • Excellent safety record
  • Reductions in OM costs
  • Reductions in radioactive waste
  • Reductions in worker exposures
  • Avoidance of pollution

4
Good News (continued)
Already filed Catawba 1,2 McGuire 1,2 St. Lucie
1,2 Fort Calhoun Robinson 2 Ginna V.C.Summer Dresd
en 2,3
Approved Calvert Cliffs 1,2 Oconee 1,2,3 Arkansas
Nuclear One Unit 1 Hatch 1,2 Turkey Point
3,4 North Anna 1,2 Surry 1,2 Peach Bottom 2,3
Announced Quad Cities 1,2 Farley 1,2 Arkansas
Nuclear One Unit 2 Nine Mile Point 1,2Cook
1,2 Browns Ferry 1,2,3 Millstone 2,3 Beaver
Valley 1,2 Brunswick 1,2 Davis-Besse Pilgrim Susqu
ehanna 1,2 7 plants not publicly announced
  • Besides excellent performance
  • License Renewal
  • Good market for pre-owned plants
  • Manpower issues being addressed
  • Upswing in university enrollments
  • National Energy Policy pro-nuclear
  • Yucca Mountain progress
  • Improved licensing process (10CFR52)

Source NEI
5
Abundant Energy
  • Is the daily bread of civilization
  • Drives the economy
  • Drives the quality of life
  • Frees man to be creative

6
However . . .
  • No new plant orders in 25 years
  • WHY?

7
Issues
  • Financial markets
  • Risk of high costs for first new plants
  • Need for realism
  • Infrastructure concerns
  • Dysfunctional deregulated energy market
  • Spent Fuel Disposal, Accident Indemnity,
    Commissioning Risk

8
Illustrative Example Capital Costs for AP1000s
Source Scully Capital Services, 2002
9
DOE 2010
  • Joint public-private effort to build and operate
    a new plant by the end of the decade
  • Early site permitting
  • Dominion, Entergy, and Exelon chosen
  • Demonstrate NRC licensing processes
  • Research advanced technologies
  • May not be enough

10
Financial Issues
  • Financial markets not prepared to finance high
    costs of first new plants
  • Power company concerns about earnings dilution
  • Concerns about delays in construction
  • Concerns about recovering costs in a deregulated
    market
  • No credits for non-financial benefits

11
Potential Mitigating Actions
  • Equity investment, loans, loan guarantees,investme
    nt tax credits, accelerated depreciation, carbon
    free emission credits
  • Standby credit facilities for delays due to
    acts of government (regulator)
  • Power purchase agreements
  • Financial credits for non-financial benefits

12
Government Stimulation is Not New
  • Stimulate restart of new construction
  • Mitigate financial issues
  • Risk mitigation by the government is common for
    all sorts of energy not just nuclear

13
Bottom Line
  • Industry must ask government to mitigate risks
    for new plants
  • Vendors must share the risk
  • New business model between utilities and vendors
  • Energy independence and environmental quality too
    important to leave to short-range market forces

14
Bottom Line
  • Generation III technology for 2010 plant
  • Generation IV promising for long term
  • After decades of experience, we can
  • Build better and faster
  • Be more proliferation resistant
  • Have increased safety
  • Minimize waste
  • Make more than electricity (hydrogen, fresh
    water)
  • Be more sustainable
  • Become energy independent

15
The American Nuclear Society
  • The Society for the advancement of nuclear
    science and technology to benefit humanity

16
Percent Favor/Oppose Use of Nuclear EnergyAnnual
Averages until 2002
Ref Bisconti Research, Inc. (BRi)
17
Nuclear power has best safety record
Deaths from Accidents from Generating
Electricity per Billion MWe-hr
101
Hydro
400-page study of 4,290 energy-related accidents
15,000 deaths related to oil, 8,000 related to
coal, 5,000 related to gas. Paul Scherrer
Institute, Switzerland, 2001
39
Coal
10
Gas
1
Nuclear
Includes Chernobyl
18
Fossil Fuel Supplies
  • Western World must reduce their dependence on oil
  • Limit influence on foreign policy
  • Reduce cost to economy of oil price shocks
  • Reduce greenhouse gas emissions
  • Prepare for inevitable resource depletion
  • Husband oil for other uses
  • Reducing oil use is not a solution to terrorism
    but it may help

19
Federal Credit Program Examples Abound
  • Many agencies use federal credit approaches to
    achieve programmatic goals.
  • Budget scoring is a fraction of credit authority
    based on Subsidy rate.
  • Examples of federal credit programs
  • FY2002
  • Program Annual credit Subsidy rate
  • Ginnie Mae Mortgages 200.0 B 0.33
  • DOEd Food direct loan program 21.6 B 4.00
  • SBA General business loans 10.7 B 1.07
  • DOA Rural utility electrification 2.6
    B 1.13
  • DOT TIFIA for transportation 2.0 B 4.50
  • NASA Commercial space 15.0 B TBD
  • transportation

Individual projects are evaluated by independent
rating agencies before funding.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com