Uganda DP Division of Labour Exercise

1
Uganda DP Division of Labour Exercise

• ODI Team
• Centre for Aid and Public Expenditure
• 9th Nov 2006

2
This presentation

• Where are we
• Data and initial findings (FDT/ Questionnaire)
• Peer review process for Nov
• Beyond the Peer review
• What we need from you

3
Where we are

• AIM design and data collection (done)
• Relating MTEF to PEAP (done)
• Peer review (now)
• ODI Team visit (mid-Nov)
• Initial report (mid-Dec)
• Input into PEAP review (tbc)
• SWG process (Jan - March 07)
• Final report (March)
• Implementation of new division of labour (March
  onwards)

4
Data so far

• Responses and data gaps
• 19 FDTs, 23 Questionnaires
• Mapping MTEF to PEAP
• First time ever
• Role of GoU
• Involvement in Exercise

5
Initial findings

• 1A Concentration and distribution of aid
• N.B. This is mock-up of PEAP engagement
• But, numbers of instruments as best proxy
• Clear clustering related to PEAP
• 1B DP characteristics
• Nothing unimportant higher standards for leading
  DP
• Leading DP particular emphasis on
• Dialogue skills and credibility in-country
  sectoral and aid modality expertise
• Actively engaged DPs
• HQ support, policy alignment credibility with
  other DPs

6
Initial findings

• 1C Sectoral patterns and engagement
• figures do not look reliable past 2007-08
  (predictability?)
• Notable short-term patterns emerging
• Major aid ? in roads/energy
• ? in public admin and in security/conflict
• ? in GBS
• education and esp health ongoing high levels

7
Peer review process
8
Peer review packs

• DPs will receive two peer reviews.
• Mapping onto PEAP
• Report 1- Overall findings
• Report 2- DP findings
• Comment form
• In addition, your own results.

9
Peer review timetable

• We need to decide on dates for following
• Send out pack to peer reviewers
• Peer reviews returned to ODI
• Reviewed with GOU
• PRs sent back to original DP
• Original DP respond to ODI with any changes
• Re-processing data by ODI
• N.B. 20th Nov team in Kampala
• Returning DP reports (for info)

10
Beyond the Peer Reviewnext steps
11
Towards the Interim Report

• Full ODI Team in Kampala (19th Nov1st Dec)
• Analysis of finalised DP returns
• Presentation and discussion workshops with GoU
  and DPs re findings and recommendations
• SWG budget workshops if possible
• Dates to be decide (suggest 21st)
• Interim report mid Dec
• Presentation at PEAP Review (tbc)

12
Interim Report

• Based on ToR using material from
• AIM (FDT, Questionnaire), peer review, other
  evaluation materials
• Report will set out
• Methodology and process
• Findings
• Recommendations for
• SWG process
• Division of labour implementation

13
SWG process

• ODI option paper presented, Option 4 chosen GOU
  based with additional support
• ODI role- providing SWG process design (Dec),
  preparing data for sectors (Jan)
• The rest is up to the SWGs - where the hard work
  begins
• Outputs of SWG process sent to ODI team from
  which we prepare final report

14
What we need from you

• Dates for peer review timetable
• Commitment to quick turn around
• Dates workshops in Nov
• Decision on support role to SWG process

15
Thank you

• Centre for Aid and Public Expenditure Overseas
  Development Institute
• 111 Westminster Bridge Road
• London SE1 7JD
• Tel [phone]
• Fax [phone]
• Email uganda.questionnaire_at_odi.org.uk
• Website www.odi.org.uk