Introduction to Science Policy HPSC 1004 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Introduction to Science Policy HPSC 1004

Description:

What do we mean by Risk? Risk and modernity. Risk in contemporary society. ... Risk and Modernity. Risk as a result of the manipulation of nature: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:104
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: simo186
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Introduction to Science Policy HPSC 1004


1
Introduction to Science PolicyHPSC 1004
  • Risk Society
  • Tom Roberts
  • PhD Researcher
  • Department of Geography
  • t.roberts_at_ucl.ac.uk

2
Overview
  • What do we mean by Risk?
  • Risk and modernity.
  • Risk in contemporary society.
  • Changing perceptions of Risk.
  • Perceived Vs. actual Risk.
  • The role of science.
  • The role of politics and civil servants.
  • The role of the media.
  • The Precautionary Principle.
  • BSE case study.
  • What is a sensible level of Risk management?
  • Implications for Policy?

3
What do we mean by Risk?
  • The study of risk concerns the difference
    between the perceived and actual risk of a
    phenomenon and the implications this has on the
    decisions made regarding the phenomenon.
  • For example, the actual risk of being killed by a
    falling tree in the UK is very small,
    approximately 1 in 10 million. However, the
    perceived risk is much higher and has resulted in
    significant preventative legislation.

4
Risk and Modernity
  • Risk as a result of the manipulation of nature
  • We are therefore concerned no longer
    exclusively with making nature useful, or with
    releasing mankind from traditional constraints,
    but also and essentially with problems resulting
    from techno-economic development itself.
  • (Beck 1992)
  • Risk is becoming its own theme - the risk
    associated with a particular technology is
    becoming the focus rather than the technology
    itself, i.e. Wireless internet.

5
Risk in Contemporary Society
  • Some social theorists have claimed that risk
    controversies are distinctively new phenomenon
    which reflect profound social, political and
    cultural transformations.
  • Life is not necessarily more risky than in the
    past but there is an increase in risks beyond our
    control.
  • There is an increase in scientific and medical
    uncertainty and increased division in expert
    opinion.

6
Changing Perceptions of Risk
  • Risks in medieval times were predictable to the
    senses.
  • In the past potential risks could be traced back
    to undersupply of hygienic technology. Today they
    have their basis in industrial overproduction.
  • A basic knowledge of science and technology
    allows people to be aware of risks without
    properly understanding them i.e. radiation.

7
Perceived Vs. Actual Risk
  • About one third as many children are killed in
    road accidents in Britain today as in 1922 when
    there was a nationwide 20 mph speed limit and
    hardly any traffic not because the streets are
    three times safer for children to play in, but
    because they are perceived by parents to be so
    dangerous that they do not let their children out
    anymore.

8
The Role of Science
  • According to Mertons norms science is supposed
    to be un-biased.
  • Science is supposed to present policy makers with
    the best scientific advice.
  • However, the same science can be used to inform a
    number of possible policy options.
  • Therefore if scientists are informing policy
    makers they are departing from strict science.
  • Furthermore, the way a problem is conceptualised
    has an impact on the type of science which is
    applied.
  • This uncertainty surrounding the science forms
    the basis for conceptualisations of risk.

9
The Problem of Uncertainty
10
The Role of Politics and Civil Servants
  • Setting the agenda for research and controlling
    the funding.
  • Government will allocate funding to areas of
    research it considers important, undermining the
    ability of scientists to conduct original work.
  • The manipulation of scientific outputs.
  • The reputation of scientists can be damaged by
    standing up to the government, i.e. Dr. David
    Kelly

11
The Role of the Media
  • The media does not simply reflect controversy or
    help to shape its portrayal in the public sphere.
  • The media coverage is an integral part of the
    controversy.
  • Media reporting, public responses and specialist
    opinion are the context in which policy making
    occurs and an integral part of the process.
  • There is not always a clear line between science
    and decision making and critically between
    science and communication and presentation.

12
The Role of the Media
  • Quote from a senior medical official in the
    Department of Health commented
  • you do have to take the line I mean what you
    cannot do is to go to ministers and say God
    knows we dont know what is going to happen.
    If you go out to the press and say we havent the
    foggiest idea what is going to happen, what do
    you think will happen there? You cant do that.
    They will then, I would guess take the worst
    possible line.
  • (Miller, D 1999)
  • Furthermore, the media can have a significant
    influence on the way the public perceive risk.
    i.e. GM crops and nuclear power.

13
The Precautionary Principle
  • Risk controversies have led to a greater use of
    the precautionary principle.
  • Increased scientific uncertainty has led to a
    precautionary measures being taken by decision
    makers i.e. the increase in flood defences.
  • However, taking a precautionary approach can also
    lead to the media and general public anticipating
    the worst case scenario and may in fact develop
    further risk controversies.

14
Marine Conservation
  • The scale and connectivity of the marine
    environment means scientific uncertainty is a
    huge problem for policy makers.
  • Introducing the precautionary principle is
    controversial.
  • Can lead to risk controversies being developed
    such as the claim that fish stocks will be
    unsustainable by 2048.
  • Such figures are not backed up by hard science
    and represent an example of scientists moving out
    of their traditional scientific role.
  • However, snappy figures are appealing to the
    media.

15
Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) Case Study
  • There is a lot of uncertainty surrounding the
    source of BSE
  • Increased use of technology in the
    manufacturing of food is a sign of the rapidly
    widening gap between individual consumers and the
    production of food.
  • This has led to a decline in our knowledge of
    food production and led to the development of
    suspicion and a risk culture.
  • Serious questions have been asked regarding the
    accuracy of the science relating to BSE.

16
Public Health or Animal Welfare Issue?
  • To date, many of the dooms day predictions
    regarding the impact of BSE on human health
    appear to have been unfounded this has led to
    an increased suspicion surrounding the science.
  • Due to the original conceptualisation of the
    problem as an animal welfare issue much of the
    research has focused on animals rather than the
    implications for humans, adding to the
    uncertainty.

17
BSE and the Media
  • The media played a pivotal role in forming public
    opinion during the BSE crisis. Public consumption
    of beef dropped considerably.
  • It was clear that the biological reality was in
    fact secondary to public opinion and perceptions.

18
What is a Sensible Level of Risk Management?
19
  • I want to talk today about a particular
    problem my experience has led me to identify. It
    is an issue that seems more of a talking point
    than an issue of policy that has many different
    facets to it that is little discussed in the way
    Im about to discuss it but which, on the basis
    of my experience, if it goes wrong, has the
    capacity to do serious damage to our country. It
    is what I call a sensible debate about risk in
    public policy making. In my view, we are in
    danger of having a wholly disproportionate
    attitude to the risks we should expect to run as
    a normal part of life. This is putting pressure
    on policy-making, not just in Government but in
    regulatory bodies, on local government, public
    services, in Europe and across parts of the
    private sector to act to eliminate risk in a
    way that is out of all proportion to the
    potential damage. The result is a plethora of
    rules, guidelines, responses to scandals of one
    nature or another that ends up having utterly
    perverse consequences.
  • (Tony Blair 2005)

20
Implications for Policy
  • Does Risk aid or hinder the policy making process?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com