ISM 6121

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

ISM 6121

Description:

85% End in Failure. Problem with measuring Success. Problem with ... I messed up (Can we try again?) 17 Responses. 53.75. 46.8. 53. 215. 234. 265. 3.161764706 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:42
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: busi210

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ISM 6121


1
ISM 6121
  • The Trilogy
  • Managers, Users
  • and Developers

2
The Trilogy
Gap
Gap
The Mgr
Gap
The User
The Geek ?
3
System Failures
  • 24 Success Rate
  • ERPs
  • 85 End in Failure
  • Problem with measuring Success
  • Problem with Communications

4
Seeking Consonance
  • Klein and Jiang (2001)

5
Different Success Measures
  • Users
  • Satisfaction
  • With the System, Usefulness, Usability, etc.
  • Managers
  • On time, Within Budget
  • Geeks
  • Code Excellence, Intellectual Stimulation
  • it is by no means assured that the parties
    involved are communicating from the same
    perspective

6
Alvarez (2002)
  • Examined Communication Patterns
  • Users and Analysts
  • Different realms of meaning!
  • Analysts
  • Technology based frame of reference
  • How can I code that
  • Users
  • Personal work experience frame of reference
  • How do I perform my job

7
Consonance
  • Collective Understanding and Agreement
  • Metrics used for Evaluation
  • Resolve Goal Conflict

8
Expectation Gaps(Discrepancy Theory)
  • Stakeholders maintain expectations
  • Expectations Reality
  • No Gap
  • Expectations lt Reality
  • Negative Gap (confirmation)
  • Satisfied
  • Expectations gt Reality
  • Positive Gap (disconfirmation)
  • Dissatisfaction

9
Results
  • Study 1 (job performance) and 2 (SERVQUAL)
  • Users vs. IS Staff
  • IS Staff discounted users expectations
  • Performance, Quality of Product, Quality of
    Personal, Dependability, Team Work, Leadership
  • IS Staff Lacked Understanding of User Expectation
  • LOW (GAP)
  • Users less satisfied with IS Staff Job
    Performance

10
Results Study 3
  • IS Staff vs. IS Management
  • Management Misjudged Staff Expectations
  • Desire to Manage, Entrepreneurship, Autonomy,
    Geographic security, Job Challenge, Employ
    Technical Expertise
  • Management Lacked Understanding of IS Staff
    Expectations
  • Gap
  • Lower IS Staff Career Satisfaction

11
Conclusions
  • Failures
  • May not be due to faulty systems but
  • Mismatched Expectations between
  • Users
  • Staff
  • Managers
  • Success Consonance
  • Pre-project Partnering
  • Develop expectations about people on the project
    team
  • Develop expectations about the process
  • Negotiated Expectations
  • Monitor Progress

12
Communication Skills
  • Hornik, Chen, Klein and Jiang
  • (2003)

13
Success Consonance
  • Premised on Communication
  • Users, Managers, Staff
  • Understand each others perceptions

14
Types of Communication
  • Interpersonal
  • 76 Oral contacts (IS Managers)
  • Presentation
  • Written
  • System proposals, requirements, documentation,
    training manuals
  • (Jacobs, 1998) http//search.epnet.com/direct.asp?
    an818336dbaphsiteehost

15
The Trilogy
Gap
Gap
The Mgr
Gap
The User
The Geek ?
16
Discrepancy Theory
  • Individuals
  • Have Expectations
  • Perceive if Expectations were met
  • If met
  • Satisfied
  • If not met
  • Unsatisfied

17
Expectation-Confirmation Theory
  • Consumer Behavior
  • Individuals
  • Form an Expectation about a service/product
  • Use the service/product
  • Compare Expectation with Perceived Performance
  • Expectation met
  • Satisfied
  • Expectation not met
  • Unsatisfied

18
Study Premise
  • IS Users, Staff and Managers
  • Difference Expectations regarding
  • Communication
  • Written, Interpersonal and Oral
  • Gap between Expectations and Perceived
    Performance
  • Affect Satisfaction
  • User satisfaction
  • Career satisfaction
  • Job performance evaluation

19
Results
  • Communication Gap is not associated with Career
    Satisfaction
  • Communication Gap is associated with User
    Satisfaction
  • Communication Gap is associated with Job
    Performance Evaluation

20
User Satisfaction
  • Not solely related to system function or
    performance.
  • Depends on Communication Competency

21
Project Team Orientations
  • Klein, Jiang, Tesch
  • (2002)

22
The Geeks
S/T
Technical
End User
U/T
All
Sociopolitical
U/S
23
Technical IS Staff Expectations
  • Commitment, Planning, Structured Techniques
  • Technicians
  • Lack knowledge of Human Needs Motivation
  • System information is privileged
  • End users are dumb!
  • End users dont care

24
End-User IS Staff Expectations
  • End-Users should play a critical role
  • System Definition
  • Training
  • Emphasize User Requirements Specs
  • Development Process is Important
  • Obtain User Acceptance

25
Sociopolitical IS Staff Expectations
  • Complications result from
  • Different End-User Personalities
  • Turnover of EUs and Top Management
  • Success or Failure depends on
  • System Development
  • Organizational Power
  • User Resistance and Politics is Inevitable

26
System Failure Perceptions
  • IT Staff Orientations System Failure
  • IT Staff Orientations Skill Needs

27
Survey Results
  • I messed up (Can we try again?)
  • 17 Responses
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)