Title: Adding Recycled Water to the SEQ Water Supply
1Adding Recycled Water to the SEQ Water Supply
2SEQ Water Supply
- The bulk of available urban water supply in SEQ
comes from Wivenhoe, Somerset, North Pine, Hinze
and Baroon Pocket Dams. - Refer to map.
3The Situation
- Wivenhoe capacity - 1,165,240 ML current
215,204 ML - Somerset capacity - 379,850 ML current
116,752 ML - North Pine capacity - 214,960 ML current
34,317 ML - Source http//www.seqwater.com.au/content/standar
d.asp?nameDamOperationsAndMaintenance
4Inflow into our dams between April 2006 and
December 2006 lowest recorded for that period of
the year at 38,923ML. Source http//statements.ca
binet.qld.gov.au/MMS/StatementDisplaySingle.aspx?i
d50056
5Current Water Usage in SEQ
- Total water usage 460,000 ML/a (about 450L per
person per day) - Rural usage about 150,000 ML/a
- Power 40,000 ML/a (Swanbank and Tarong)
- Domestic Usage about 2/3 of Urban
- Source NRM, South East Queensland Regional Water
Supply Strategy, Stage 2 Interim Report, Nov.
2005.
6Western Corridor Recycled Water Scheme
- Refer to map http//www.westerncorridor.com.au/map
.aspx?docId30 - Basically 3 AWT facilities will be constructed.
- 200 odd kms of pipes visiting the 3 AWT
facilities, a number of existing WT facilities,
Swanbank and Tarong power stations and Wivenhoe
dam. - Able to supply 210ML/day of which about 95ML/day
will go to the power stations leaving about
115ML/day (about 42,000ML/a) to potentially
augment the water supply. - Sources http//www.westerncorridor.com.au/home.as
px?docId1 - http//www.qwc.qld.gov.au/Long-termstrategy
7(No Transcript)
8Alternatives
- Recommissioning old dams (add 30-40ML/day)
- Demand reduction water restrictions, rebates
for water saving technology etc. - Pressure reduction and leakage management (add
45-50ML/day) - Tugun desalination plant (55-110ML/day)
- New dams (Wyaralong and Traveston Crossing)
- Raise existing dams
- SEQ Water grid
- Pray for rain
9(No Transcript)
10For Adding Recycled Water to the SEQ Water Supply
11Water Shortage
- How do we resolve this issue (if at all)?
- Demand side options
- Supply side options
- Both
12Supply Side Alternatives
- Construction of new dams
- Significant environmental concerns.
- Build more pipelines and other infrastructure
projects - Transporting water over long distances will
involve prohibitive costs for pumping (Quiggin
2005). - A Kilolitre of water is currently delivered to
urban consumers for around 70 cents. - Will not be economically feasible a waste of
time and money.
13Supply Side Alternatives
- Desalination
- Capital and operating costs will be significantly
higher than for traditional sources. - Suitable location of desalination plant.
- Technologies used (reverse osmosis) are energy
intensive and therefore depend on energy costs. - Estimates for supply of water from desalination
are often around 1.50/KL (Quiggin 2005).
14Supply Side Alternatives
- Recycling
- Generally less energy-intensive than
desalination. - Perceived health and aesthetic concerns.
- In California, water supplies have been
intentionally replenished with recycled water in
Los Angeles county since the 1960s. - Based on the results of the Health Effects Study
(Nellor et al., 1984) and recommendations of the
State of California Scientific Advisory Panel
(Robeck, 1987), authorization was given to
increase the annual quantity of recycled water
used for replenishment (Khan and Roser, 2007).
15Supply Side Alternatives
- Recycling
- In Singapore, the Singapore Water Reclamation
Study found NEWater to be well within current
World Health Organization guidelines for drinking
water quality - Fish studies were undertaken to assess long-term
chronic toxicity as well as estrogenic potential
(reproductive and developmental). - The results showed no evidence of estrogenic
effects from exposure to NEWater.
16Conclusion
- Recycling is the best option given the
alternatives. - Does not depend primarily on rainfall and
temperature. - Is a sustainable and renewable source.
17Against Adding Recycled Water to the SEQ Water
Supply
18Some Positives to Waste Water
- Can be brought online relatively quickly (before
2008, which is when we would run dry if there is
no more rain). - Can use to replace the drinkable water that is
going to the power station and some industry
applications. - Relatively cheap - 1.50/kL (current residential
1.40/kL)
19Some negatives To a Murky Solution
- There are unresolved health issues with waste
contaminated water. - Treatment of waste water is generally very
effective in removing harmful materials. - However traces of endocrine disrupters
remain.Big deal? The endocrine system regulates
hormones which determines among other things your
appearance as a male or female. - Fish in polluted areas have been seen to change
sex.
20Health Issues Continued
- Talk of filling dams with waste water, if drought
continue potentially a large proportion of water
will be ex-waste. - Other nations have a small proportion of ex-waste
water in their drinking water. - Given that we are unsure about possible health
impacts on humans shouldnt this be a method of
last resort rather then our first option.
21No public referendum
- Public acceptance is a problem see the result
in Toowoomba referendum. - Beattie cancelled opportunity for public vote on
the issue.
22Alternatives - Demand reduction
- Current system involves quantity controls (water
restrictions) and subsidies for adopting
water-efficient technologies. - This strategy flies in the face of all economic
principles that prices act as the most efficient
form of rationing. - Akin to Communism- top down decision making
23Alternatives Rural-Urban Trade
- Farmers get an allocation of water for
irrigating. - Temporary trades of these rights are typically at
prices that are much lower than retail rates. - Why not buy allocations back from the farmers,
treat it and supply to urban users. - In a desert nation rice and cotton is still
grown, rise in prices will provide incentives for
a movement to more water efficient crops and
smart irrigation techniques.