Benchmarking for Organizational Excellence in Addiction Treatment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Benchmarking for Organizational Excellence in Addiction Treatment

Description:

Involvement of Significant Others. Organizational Climate ... Articles and other resources. One Year Subscription Fee. Annual Subscription Fee: $1,000 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:92
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: paullef
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Benchmarking for Organizational Excellence in Addiction Treatment


1
Benchmarking for Organizational Excellence in
Addiction Treatment
  • Paul M. Lefkovitz, Ph.D.
  • President, Behavioral Pathway Systems

2
The Measurement of Organizational Performance
  • Performance is measured in all addiction
    treatment settings
  • How helpful is performance data?
  • Does data drive organizational vision?
  • Does data drive organizational decision-making?

3
The Limitations of Outcomes
  • A thermometer reading would be of no value as a
    measure of your health
  • If you didn't know that 98.6 is the average
    temperature!

4
The Limitations of Outcomes in Your Organization
  • Similarly, knowing that your missed appointment
    rate is 27 is of little value in evaluating the
    health of your agencyif you dont know how
    others are performing

5
Data without Meaning
  • We are deluged with data without meaning
  • Data without a context is just a bunch of numbers
  • What is the answer?

6
The Role of Benchmarking
  • Benchmarks provide the vital external context for
    understanding your outcomes

7
Benchmarking Defined
  • Gift and Mosel (1994) define benchmarking as
    the continual and collaborative discipline of
    measuring and comparing the results of key work
    processes
  • Gift, R. and Mosel, D. (1994). Benchmarking in
    Health Care, American Hospital Association

8
A Tiered Model of Benchmarking
  • Descriptive Benchmarking
  • Comparative Benchmarking
  • Process Benchmarking
  • Each builds on the preceding type

9
Descriptive Benchmarking
  • Most common form of benchmarking
  • Industry overviews, government reports
  • Static snapshot of industry performance
  • No formal or statistical comparisons between an
    organizations performance and industry norms
  • Eyeball analysis can be misleading

10
Comparative Benchmarking
  • Formal comparison of an organizations
    performance against a descriptive benchmark
  • Typically reported as percentile rankings but can
    be reported in graph form also

11
The Importance of Formal Comparative Benchmarks
12
The Limitations of Benchmarking
  • Benchmarks profile your organization against
    others and help identify opportunities for
    improvement

13
Improve? How?
  • Benchmarks do not give any indication as to how
    to improve

14
The How Process Benchmarking
  • Based on a simple premise The methods of top
    performers differ from those of others
  • Process benchmarking systematically compares
    tactics of top performers with those of others
  • Methods that distinguish between top performers
    and others may be regarded as potential best
    practices

15
Benchmarks Where are They?
  • Readily accessible, relevant and affordable
    comparative benchmarking data is hard to come by

16
Benchmarking for Organizational Excellence in
Addiction Treatment
  • SAAS, NIATx, and Behavioral Pathway Systems are
    partnering to sponsor an addiction-specific
    national benchmarking initiative
  • BPS specializes in behavioral health and human
    services benchmarking and has numerous state and
    national benchmarking initiatives underway

17
Objectives of Benchmarking Initiative
  • Provide SAAS with information it needs to
    advocate for its members
  • Provide participating organizations with
    individualized comparative benchmark data that
    can serve as a vital context for understanding
    measured outcomes
  • Provide a powerful vehicle for the identification
    of best practices and organizational improvement
    through process benchmarking and the application
    of NIATx principles

18
Benchmark Selection Process
  • National interest survey conducted
  • Interest
  • Availability of Data
  • 354 respondents
  • Survey findings guided Steering Committee
    decisions

19
Scope of Benchmarks
  • Comprehensive range of benchmarks
  • Operational, clinical, organizational climate,
    and financial domains of performance
  • 21 benchmark dimensions
  • Approximately 150 input metrics

20
Operational Benchmarks
  • Initial Access
  • Length of Stay/Utilization, by Level of Care
  • Subsequent Access (Number of days from intake to
    first treatment appt)
  • Average Caseload Size of Clinician, by Level of
    Care
  • Outpatient Productivity
  • Average Group Size

21
Clinical Benchmarks
  • Engagement/Retention, by Level of Care
  • Outpatient No-Show/Cancellation Rates
  • Client Satisfaction/Perceptions of Care
  • Degree of Engagement with Recovery Support
    Services
  • Involvement of Significant Others

22
Organizational Climate
  • Staff Morale/Satisfaction (25 Item Measure and
    automated administration and scoring to be
    provided)
  • Staff Retention/Turn-Over
  • Percent of Staff Position Vacancies (Counselors)

23
Financial Benchmarks
  • Cost per Unit of Service, by Level of Care
  • Salaries, by Role
  • Administrative Overhead as a Percent of Total
    Expenses
  • Payer Mix
  • Current Ratio (Assets Divided by Liabilities)
  • Net Days in Accounts Receivable
  • Days of Cash on Hand

24
Data Submission
  • On-line benchmarking survey
  • Aggregated anonymous data-no complicated
    encounter-level data
  • No software needed
  • User-friendly, encrypted and secure
  • Available 24/7
  • Submit relevant and available data--no reporting
    requirements
  • State-of-the-art on-line data validation

25
BenchmarkingReports
  • Standard Report
  • Executive Summary Report
  • Organizational Climate Report
  • Run Charts

26
Standard Benchmarking Report
  • Normative Data
  • Sample Size
  • Mean
  • Median
  • Standard Deviation
  • Comparative Data
  • Overall Percentile Rankings
  • Peer Group Comparisons (budget size, geographic
    area, setting) Apples to Apples
  • Maine Norms
  • Previous Scores

27
Standard Benchmarking Report
28
Executive Summary Report
  • Designed for busy senior leaders and boards
  • Graphic representation of scores
  • Brief, key highlights

29
Executive Summary Report
30
Executive Summary Report II
31
Run Charts
  • Track your data over time
  • Trend analysis
  • Examine interplay among different benchmarking
    dimensions

32
Accommodations for Multiple Locations
  • Satellite locations easily accommodated
  • Each location can be benchmarked independently to
    produce a separate report
  • No limit to number of additional locations

33
Moving Beyond the Numbers
  • Benchmarking is not just about data
  • When data is generated, real fun begins
  • Identify potential best practices through process
    benchmarking and other vehicles
  • Enhance organizational performance through NIATx
    principles
  • Emphasis on shared learning from one another and
    from top performers
  • A learning community

34
Shared Activities and Available Resources
  • Monthly audio-conferences/user support meetings
  • Monthly newsletter to educate and inform
  • Telephonic and E-Mail user support
  • Free telephonic consultation in interpreting your
    data and developing improvement strategies
  • Articles and other resources

35
One Year Subscription Fee
  • Annual Subscription Fee 1,000
  • Includes all benefits described
  • Brochure/Order form available through SAAS

36
Questions?
  • Contact
  • Paul M. Lefkovitz, Ph.D.
  • President, Behavioral Pathway Systems
  • 877-330-9870 (Toll-Free)
  • plefk_at_bpsys.org
  • www.bpsys.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com