A Basic Income for Europes Children - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

A Basic Income for Europes Children

Description:

A shift from the childless to children, as expected ... burdens on the low-income childless with non-benefit income (especially pensioners) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: hle63
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A Basic Income for Europes Children


1
A Basic Income for Europes Children?
  • Horacio Levy, Christine Lietz and Holly
    Sutherland
  • ISER, University of Essex
  • Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna
  • IMA conference 20-22 August 2007, Vienna

2
Motivation
  • Child poverty rates vary widely across the EU
    (EU-15)
  • from 9 in Denmark to 26 in Italy in 2004
    (Eurostat)
  • Policies that are intended to increase the
    incomes of families with children vary widely in
    size and design.
  • What would be the effect of a common level and
    structure of child payment across the EU?
  • What if the burden of financing the cost were
    shared between EU nations rather than borne
    within them?

3
What the paper does
  • Uses EUROMOD to simulate the effects of topping
    up existing cash support for children to a
    guaranteed level for each child (CBI)
  • Considers how to set the level, and explores the
    implications of various levels on child poverty
    rates
  • level relative to the national or EU median
    incomes
  • child poverty relative to 60 of national or EU
    median incomes
  • Makes the implementation of the top-up
    revenue-neutral (first round) by financing it
    with a fully-flat tax set at the European level
  • Gainers and losers families and countries

4
EUROMOD
  • A tax-benefit microsimulation model for EU15
  • Built with comparability across countries as the
    main objective
  • Based on 12 different sources of household
    microdata
  • 2001 systems of cash benefits, income taxes and
    social contributions are simulated
  • Household disposable income can be calculated and
    re-calculated under alternative scenarios
  • Static calculations
  • no modelling of individual behavioural change
  • no accounting for macro-economic second order
    effects
  • assume full take-up of benefits and no tax evasion

5
Child basic income (CBI) design and assumptions
  • Qualifying children aged lt 18
  • CBIs are set as proportions of median national
    equivalised household incomes 10, 20, 30, 40
  • Top-up to existing child contingent payments
  • If the CBI is less than the amount received on
    behalf of a particular child, this amount remains
    unchanged
  • The additional payment is not taxed or withdrawn
    by other parts of the tax-benefit system
  • Flat tax common EU rate on all non-benefit
    income
  • Poverty threshold national using 60 of baseline
    median as fixed threshold

6
Effects of the CBIs
  • The size of the average payment depends on
  • The level of national income and the proportion
    of median national incomes that is used
  • The size of the existing system of child payments
  • The extent of targeting of the existing system
  • The aggregate cost also depends on
  • The number of children in the population
  • The distributional effect also depends on
  • The position of children in the distribution
  • Household composition
  • The nature of any targeting under the existing
    system

7
Average total child payment per child under the
CBI
8
Reduction in the child poverty rate
9
Paying for it with a flat tax
  • Tax on all non-benefit income with no exemptions,
    allowances etc additional to existing taxes
  • 0.52 pays for a 10 CBI 6.92 for a 40 CBI
  • High income countries contribute more per capita
    in terms
  • There are losers as well as gainers
  • Within countries
  • A shift from the childless to children, as
    expected
  • Some high income households with children lose
  • But in some countries households with children as
    a group are net losers

10
Gainers and losers between countries the net
budgetary effect of the CBI/FT as of HDI
11
Concluding points policy lessons
  • Practical policy lessons low levels of CBIs are
    effective in the Southern countries with
    under-developed existing systems
  • Financing a child BI with a pure FT involves
    undesirable burdens on the low-income childless
    with non-benefit income (especially pensioners)
  • consider other financing options
  • consider a complementary guaranteed pension
    income (FT exempt)
  • Between country subsidies? Why should a country
    that has a good standard of child support
    contribute to those that do not?
  • race to the bottom?
  • But how else to redistribute to poor children in
    poor countries?
  • fertility and a shared investment?
  • CBI as a top-up?
  • national financing, with other mechanisms for
    cross-border subsidy
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com