Title: BECTA Annual Research Conference
1BECTA Annual Research Conference
- The impact of the SENCO forum
- Ann Lewis
- London, June 2002
2Purpose of the forum
- To provide an opportunity to discuss issues that
relate to SENCOs support for pupils and the
development of ideas and practice in special
needs provision, and to enable communication
between those working in Higher Education, and
practitioners in LEAs and schools - Quoted in NCET 1997 p 26
3Education budgets, Est 01-02
- ENGLAND LSB
-
- c 15 held centrally by LEAs
- Of which c 35.2 SEN
-
- C 85 devolved to schools
- Of which c 3-7 SEN
4- Tribunals 94-01 of appeals by SEN
- Autism 3 gt
15 - EBD 6 gt
14 - Severe learning difficulties 6 gt 4
- Moderate learning difficulties 9 gt 5
- Literacy incl SpLD 40 gt 34
5Support staff in schools in England Source
Howson 2002
6Evaluations/ research into the senco forum
- 1995 - CMC/SENCOs. Study 1 re pilot
- 1997 - CMC/SENCOs. c 500 members. Studies 2 and
3 re usage - 2000 - Study 4 c 900 members archive study re.
usage - 2001 - Study 5 library/ archive study re ICT
requirements - 2002 - Study 6 re impact c 840 members
7FOCUS Perceived impact of the forum
- Who uses the forum?
- What is the pattern of usage ? cf earlier
studies - What are the perceived professional gains?
- What are the perceived personal benefits?
8Target SENCO-forum groups
- 1. Active members who send public messages
- 2. Active members who send private messages
- 3. Passive members i.e. those who read, but do
not send, messages - 4. Non-members who come across messages through
the BECTA archive
9Time scale January-May 2002
- Forum notice / questionnaire
- late February
- Return date 5 April
10- A higher rate of contributions are associated
with members who have - (1) a comparative lack of real-world social
support and - (2) greater levels of skills/ competence
- (Cummings et al 2002)
11Returns
- 143 returns (3 blank)
- NOT a pre-selected group
- Note large minority of members join/leave forum
each month
12Numbers joining/leaving forumsourceJason
Douglas, BECTA
13Monthly postings to forum
14Who uses the forum?
- Returns from spread of 63 LEAs/ regions across
England and Wales - Schools representative re SEN numbers
- SENCOs just over half similar to BECTA base
- 21 different user groups by professional
background
15School backgrounds Teachers re SEN (62.8)
- ½ from infant, junior or primary schools
- 1/3 from secondary schools
- 1/10 from nursery schools
- 1/10 from special schools
- 1 respondent from FE
16Parents (13.6)
- One reservation I have with using the Forum to
seek direct help is that it now has a wide
audience outside that of teaching colleagues. I
am always unsure whether or not parents may read
my queries or comments. This definitely
restricts what I say or ask.
17Other users
- Publishers/consultants/ charities (13.6)
- Support workers (11.4)
- Advisory teachers (7.1)
- Educational psychologists (6.4)
- LEA officers/inspectors (5.7)
- Academics/researchers (5.7)
18Sources of professional help
- 2/3 named 29 different professional groups
- 2/3 named 34 different print-based sources
- 2/3 named various internet based sources
19Qualifications of respondents
- 2/3 had a first degree
- ¼ had a higher degree
-
20- The forum has been invaluable. I am mainly a
listener in but I have been known to
contribute. I have learned so much from the
experts out there and I have found the forum
such a brilliant resource.
21Reading of messages
- 9/10 reportedly read messages at least once a
week - 8/10 reported reading over ½ of all the messages
- Just over 1/10 read between ¼ and ½ of the
messages - Under 1/10 read less than ¼ of the messages
22(No Transcript)
23Basis for selecting messages read
- Nearly ½ - general professional or personal
relevance -
- Nearly ½ - specific topic
- Nearly 1/10 - identity of the sender
24Sending of messages
- ½ sent public messages
- ¼ sent private messages to individuals on the
forum - Nearly 2/3 of the users with higher degrees
sent public and/or (very rarely) private messages.
25(No Transcript)
26Perceived value
- 2/5 gave professional aspects only
- 1/5 gave personal aspects only
- 2/5 gave a mix of personal and professional
aspects - NB open ended cf rankings
27Professional value 1. Up to date
- Many users reported that the forum is where the
latest information can be accessed immediately
and, because of the diverse population of the
forum, there is normally someone either involved
in, or with good knowledge of, the latest
initiative.
28- As a member of a dyslexia association, I find it
invaluable to listen to what teachers are
thinking and feeling. I feel it helps us to
support them and to persuade our parents that
teachers are often on their side but constrained
by funding. I also pick up so many very valuable
tips and strategies to pass on to others
29Professional value 2. Government links
- Government circulars and similar documents can be
discussed to ensure that they have been
understood. Through this process, the
individuals response to documents can be
compared with the reactions of other forum users.
30- Main value is To be in touch with the
mainstream even though I am an expatriate. I
work in a British curriculum school.
31Professional value 3. Depth speed
- The forum is used as a way of finding links to
in-depth information from other sources, saving
valuable time and effort. .. forum members can
pass on the names and addresses of valuable
websites, contacts, journals, charities and
organisations.
32Professional value 4. Curriculum
- The forum is also used as a source of information
for pedagogic developments across the SEN sector.
Messages are also posted about best practice and
practicalities of these developments
33- I am also interested in .. good classroom
practice. Since I do not work in schools (as I
teach privately nowadays) the forum enables me to
see what the concerns of the day are and helps me
to keep in touch with what is happening in
schools etc
34Professional value 5. CPD
- Some respondents reported the use of the forum in
their initial and/or continuing professional
development at a range of levels including higher
degrees, initial teacher education and SEN
diplomas or certificates.
35- I am often generously supplied with downloadable
resources from other SENCOs etc -
36- I am SENCO at a school, which for various reasons
has not acknowledged the existence of special
needs up till now. SENCO Forum has been a good
source of INSET for me. I know what we should be
doing but when it will all happen I am not sure.
Hence, the anonymity of the system is - extremely useful for me. Mine is a well-known
school.
37Personal value 1. Support
38- Its brilliant. The contributions are
knowledgeable, caring, funny, contributors are
willing to give of their time to help others.
The light-hearted stuff has been equally
supportive in getting me through some very dark
personal times recently.
39Personal value 2. Reduced isolation
40- My school operates a mushroom style of
management, its good to know what goes on
elsewhere and talk/defend with.
41Personal value 3. Altruism
42- A means of sharing my hard won specialist
knowledge/ experience and best practice with
colleagues for the benefit of all children, not
just those in the schools in which I work .
43Particular issues1. Mentoring
44Particular issues2. Cliques
45- Some people dominate the forum with huge e-mails
and that is wearing. There is a small clique
of people who must have a lot of time on their
hands.
46Particular issues3. Volume of
messages
47- The forum is a vibrant community of fellow
seekers of wisdom and an international family
at times we argue and bicker, have a good moan or
cry for help, but all moods are catered for. The
forum has developed over the last few years into
a unique group of caring colleagues with a
massive personality of its own. Long may it
continue.
48Recommendations
- Sustain the SENCO arena as the context for the
forum - Inclusiongt Encourage contributions from
non-education professionals - Maintain the archive
- Review as a prototype for other groups
49Follow up studies
- Covert and explicit mentoring
-
- Moderate and low users
- Support workers
50- True communities tend to be leaderless or to
have a shifting personal authority. The
connection among individuals that respects their
individuality and that is not linear or
hierarchical is what is often referred to as a
community. A community respects the individual
and yet finds common ground. We may argue that a
community is in some sense related to anarchy.
Purves 1998
51Acknowledgements
- Research team Ann Lewis, Martin Ogilvie, Liz
Potts, Lin Walsh - BECTA Terry Waller, Jason Douglas
- Chair of Advisory Group, Klaus Wedell
- Advisory Group members
52- Contact details University of Birmingham,
School of Educatione mail a.lewis_at_bham.ac.uk
tel 0121 414 4822/ 4834