25th Anniversary of BayhDole Fulfilling its Promise - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

25th Anniversary of BayhDole Fulfilling its Promise

Description:

'Science The Endless Frontier' Prior 1945. No NIH, NSF, ONR ... Fed's begin spending big bucks on research and generating many innovations ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: richard782
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 25th Anniversary of BayhDole Fulfilling its Promise


1
25th Anniversary of Bayh-Dole Fulfilling its
Promise
  • Richard Kordal, PhD
  • Director, OIPC
  • Louisiana Tech University

2
Mr. Peabodys Wacbac Machine
3
Science The Endless Frontier
  • Prior 1945
  • No NIH, NSF, ONR
  • Little Govnt support for basic research
  • Success Manhattan Project
  • Demonstrated importance of university research to
    national defense
  • Vannevar Bush pens Science The Endless
    Frontier
  • Recognized value University basic research to
    economy
  • Concept academic technology transfer takes shape
  • Report instrumental in stimulating increased
    federal funding for basic research (and formation
    NIH, NSF, ONR)
  • Federal funding of basic research now considered
    vital to national interest

4
1960s and 70s
5
RD Spending Increases
  • Feds begin spending big bucks on research and
    generating many innovations
  • But technology not getting adopted by industry
  • In 1980 federal govnt held title approx 28,000
    patents, fewer 5 licensed to industry
  • Whats the problem?

6
Problem
  • Federal govnt retained title to inventions
    developed with their money
  • Rationale research funded by public should
    belong to the public
  • Though theoretically attractive, govnt doesnt
    run like business, no experience commercializing
    technology
  • Govnt practice granting non-exclusive licenses
    removed incentives for industry to invest
  • No uniform polices among govnt agencies

7
Were conflicted
  • Much study and debate about patent policy
  • Those who favored govnt retention of title on
    one side
  • Small businesses, consumer advocates who feared
    big business would gain unfair advantage,
    possibly lead to monopolies, high prices
  • Those who favored grantee/contractor retention of
    title formed other side
  • This group foresaw stimulus to innovation that
    would be provided by patent ownership

8
President Jimmy Carter
9
Carters Recommendation
  • In 1979, President Carter publicly advocates full
    title retention for universities and small
    businesses but not big businesses
  • For big businesses, Carter proposes granting
    exclusive licenses
  • Predictably big business opposed to any
    restrictions on large business contractors

10
Birch Bayh and Bob Dole
11
Bayh-Dole Act
  • Senators Bayh and Dole recognized that the public
    would benefit by a policy that allowed
    contractors to retain title to inventions made
    under federal funding
  • But given the realities of the day, it was
    unlikely to get passed if it included large
    corporations
  • Their bill, introduced in 1980, applicable to
    non-profits and small businesses
  • Thereby avoided opposition by consumer advocates

12
Bayh-Dole Contd
  • Allows non-profits and small business contractors
    to choose to retain title to federally-funded
    inventions
  • If option is exercised, it places various
    responsibilities on contractor
  • These obligations are not insignificant
  • Some characterized them as implied duty to
    commercialize
  • e.g., patent filing requirement, utilization
    reporting

13
President Ronald Reagan
14
Bayh-Dole Scope Expanded
  • In initial years following enactment, large
    business continued to operate under the old
    system
  • In 1983 President Reagan by executive order
    expanded the scope of Bayh-Dole to include large
    businesses
  • Uniform patent policy applicable to all govnt
    contractors of federally-supported research

15
Building Technology Transfer Office (TTO)
  • With passage of the Act, research universities
    began to develop and strengthen the expertise
    needed to engage in technology transfer
  • Requires team with mixed skill set legal,
    business and scientific backgrounds
  • Also administrative requirements of complying
    with the reporting obligations of the Act
  • Years following passage Bayh-Dole saw big growth
    in number of universities engaged in technology
    transfer
  • All major academic research institutions have
    created and staffed offices

16
TTO Start Dates
AUTM 2003 Annual Survey
17
Growth Research Expenditures
AUTM 2003 Annual Survey
18
Growth in Invention Disclosures
AUTM 2003 Annual Survey
19
Patent Filings
AUTM 2003 Annual Survey
20
Issued Patents
AUTM 2003 Annual Survey
21
Spending on Legal Fees
AUTM 2003 Annual Survey
22
License and Option Agmts
AUTM 2003 Annual Survey
23
Break-out of Average Number License/Option
Executed
AUTM 2003 Annual Survey
24
Small vs Large Companies
AUTM 2003 Annual Survey
25
Exclusive vs Non-Exclusive Licenses
AUTM 2003 Annual Survey
26
Exclusivity Patterns
AUTM 2003 Annual Survey
27
Cumulative Active Lic/Option Agmts
AUTM 2003 Annual Survey
28
License Income
AUTM 2003 Annual Survey
29
Million Dollar Licenses
AUTM 2003 Annual Survey
30
Distribution of Royalty Income
AUTM 2003 Annual Survey
31
Start-ups
AUTM 2003 Annual Survey
32
Number of Spin-Outs
AUTM 2003 Annual Survey
33
Products
  • In FY2003 472 new commercial products were
    introduced to the marketplace
  • Since 1998 a total of 2,230 new products
  • 60 drugs and vaccines on market today were
    discovered by university researchers

34
Summary
  • By these quantative measures Bayh-Dole has been
    hugely successful
  • Many other countries around the world are looking
    to emulate Bayh-Dole
  • Aside from providing a source of income to
    universities, it has more importantly had a
    larger societal impact
  • New business creation
  • Innovative products
  • Final Bayh-Dole Act was result of many years of
    intense and emotional debate
  • Safeguards were included to address these
    concerns

35
Thank you
36
Questions/Comments
Richard Kordal, PhD Director, Office of
Intellectual Property and Commercialization Louisi
ana Tech University Enterprise Center   PO Box
3145 Campus Box 44 Ruston, LA 71272 Phone (318)
257-2484 Fax (318) 257-4703 Email
rkordal_at_latech.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com