Francis Wallace, Partner - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Francis Wallace, Partner

Description:

But English law deals with practical problems arising in different ways ... to the defendant's use e.g. Brook's Wharf v Goodman Bros [1936] 3 All ER 696 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:59
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: Shirley48
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Francis Wallace, Partner


1
Pre-Contractual Liability Presentation to
Eurojuris International Litigation Group Riga,
May 2007
presented by Francis Wallace, Partner
2
  • No general duty to negotiate in good faith
  • But English law deals with practical problems
    arising in different ways

3
  • Requirements for formation of a valid contract
  • Offer
  • Acceptance
  • Consideration money/something worth money
  • Intention to create legal relations

4
  • Special types of contracts
  • Sale of interests in land must be in writing
  • Terms in one document or at least referred to in
    the main document
  • S2 Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act
    1989

5
  • Incomplete contracts
  • Distinction between invitation to treat and offer
  • Example Gibson v Manchester City Council 1979
    1 All ER 972

6
  • Conditional contracts
  • No binding contract unless and until the
    condition is fulfilled

7
  • Letters of intent
  • Sometimes no legal commitment
  • Sometimes implied agreement that preliminary
    costs are payable where no contract is concluded
  • Express agreement to pay preliminary costs

8
  • Quasi-Contract
  • where the defendant has acquired a benefit from
    the Claimants act
  • Where the defendant has acquired from a third
    party a benefit for which he must account to the
    claimant
  • Where the defendant has acquired a benefit
    through his own wrongful act

9
  • Examples of quasi-contract claims
  • money paid by the claimant to the defendants
    use e.g. Brooks Wharf v Goodman Bros 1936 3
    All ER 696
  • Total failure of consideration e.g. Rowland v
    Divall 1923 2 KB 500
  • Claims on a quantum meruit

10
  • Estoppel
  • One person makes a clear and unambiguous
    representation, intending the other to act on it
  • The other person relies on the representation to
    his detriment
  • The person who made the representation is
    estopped or prevented from denying its truth

11
  • Estoppel
  • Central London Property Trust Limited v High
    Trees House Limited 1947 KB 130
  • Note estoppel can only be used as a defence and
    not as a right of action

12
  • Estoppel - Continued
  • Use to support a claim to an interest in
    property Cobbe v Yeomans Row Management Limited
    2005 EWHC 266
  • Note if discussions are subject to contract,
    this normally defeats an estoppel claim

13
  • Francis Wallace
  • Rix Kay
  • The Courtyard
  • River Way
  • Uckfield
  • East Sussex TN22 3AA
  • England
  • Tel 00 1825 744421
  • Fax 00 1825 767460
  • Email FrancisWallace_at_rixandkay.co.uk
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com