339 Metrics and Misroutes 16 Nov 2005 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

339 Metrics and Misroutes 16 Nov 2005

Description:

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e ... Currently tracked and briefed by DLA & AF. Quantifies AF's response to DLA engineering request ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:65
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: CaptKent6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 339 Metrics and Misroutes 16 Nov 2005


1
339 Metrics and Misroutes16 Nov 2005
Air Force Materiel Command
Developing, Fielding, and Sustaining Americas
Aerospace Force
  • Dave Crouse
  • HQ AFMC/A4YE
  • DSN 787-6453charles.crouse_at_wpafb.af.mil

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l
l e n c e
2
339 Metrics and Misroutes
  • Metrics
  • - Definition
  • - Current metrics measurement
  • - Current statistics
  • - Problem
  • - Average process days
  • - Recommendations
  • Misroutes
  • - Definition
  • - Statistics
  • - AF Actions

3
339 Metrics Definition
  • Definition of metrics
  • A metric is a formally defined measurement
    necessary in order to
  • - Predict need
  • - Manage risk
  • - Control processes
  • - Define a baseline
  • - Optimize efforts
  • An effective metric is one that
  • - Is understandable
  • - Is objective
  • - Is valid
  • - Is timely
  • - Does not drive undesirable behavior by
    concentrating on one metric to the exclusion of
  • other areas

4
(No Transcript)
5
Current Metrics Measurement
On-Time percentages
ACTUAL
FY03 FY04 FY05
CATEGORY
a. Required Response Time
84.7
75.6
58.5
lt 30 days
b. Required Response Time
30 days
63.5
66.5
79.8
c. Required Response Time
68.9
70.9
81.7
45 days
d. Required Response Time
60 days
73.8
73.3
81.7
e. Required Response Time
90 days
74.8
79.3
88.7
f. Required Response Time
gt 90 days
95.0
86.9
91.4
Source ESA web, 7 Nov 05
6
Current Statistics
Source ESA web 7 Nov 05
7
Problem
  • The current metrics have affected a positive
    change to
  • the timeliness metric but a change is needed
  • - Go now from a broad brush approach to a
    fine
  • tuning effort
  • The metric used to measure timeliness for the
    services
  • does not relate to the effort involved.
  • - Based on DLA need for the item
  • - Late is late whether it is one day or 30
    days
  • - Some actions nearly impossible to
    accomplish in 30/45 days,
  • e.g. TDP development/validation

8
Average Process Days
Source OC-ALC FY03-05 data tracking
9
Recommendations
  • Begin measuring the timeliness metric based on
    the
  • following
  • - Business days vice calendar days
  • - Requests for TDP development/validation NLT
  • 60 days
  • Begin measuring the two quality metrics
    directed by
  • DLAI 3200.1
  • - Quality of the 339 received by the services
  • - Quality of the 339 response back to DLA
  • Program for the additional 25 rate increase to
    be
  • effective for FY07

10
Misroute Definition
  • A misroute is defined as a 339 that has been
    sent by DLA to an incorrect focal point.
  • Example 1 DLA sends a 339 to OC-ALC but the
    engineering group that needs to work the item is
    located in OO-ALC.
  • Example 2 DLA sends a 339 to OC-ALC but the
    data in their data system is an OO-ALC code.

11
Misroute Statistics
FY05 Misroute Percentages
12
AF Actions
  • Prioritize misrouted items for review based on
    potential
  • need
  • Will need input from DLA
  • Working with the Defense Logistics Information
  • System (DLIS) folks at Battle Creek to verify
    codings
  • Beginning with OC-ALC (SX)
  • Validating MMAC and the MOE rule on each item
  • Coordinating with the ALCs

13
AF Actions (Contd)
  • Working with HQ cataloging people to get
    incorrect
  • codes changed as they are found
  • The gaining ALC on a misroute notifies
    cataloging
  • of the correct code
  • ALCs alerting each other as misroutes are
    discovered
  • (Phone, E-mail)
  • AF trying to I/D the correct ESA at the focal
    point
  • level before involving engineering.
  • AF reviewing all of the data that DLA sends to
  • better I/D misroutes.
  • Only charge for the item if engineering is
    involved

14
QUESTIONS?
15
Back up slides
16
339 Processing Source Cycle Time
  • Recommendation Expand this metric to measure
    all buckets of time associated with procurement
    process (e.g. source cycle time)
  • Set targets for each segment
  • Consistent with Source Cycle Time metrics on
    Sustainment Mission Area Balanced Scorecard
  • Subset of DLA response time
  • DLA request 339 metrics be added to PAC metric
    package
  • Currently tracked and briefed by DLA AF
  • Quantifies AFs response to DLA engineering
    request
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com