Responses on the World Food Crisis : - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Responses on the World Food Crisis :

Description:

Land alienation intensified (in line with neo-liberal policies) SEZs, large ... was then imposed on Singur (75 days), barring people from outside to enter ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:92
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: EEPA
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Responses on the World Food Crisis :


1
Responses on the World Food Crisis
  • Few observations from small marginal peasants
    in India

Ms. Ujjaini Halim Institute for Motivating Self
Employment (IMSE), India
2
Land Alienation A major threat to smallholders
  • Around 95 smallholders in India
  • Lack of access to Resources
  • Land alienation intensified (in line with
    neo-liberal policies) SEZs, large scale agro-fuel
    production, privatisation of common resources
  • High costs of inputs making production
    unprofitable (without support from the state)
  • Genuine Agrarian reform agenda has taken a back
    seat, despite several national/international
    commitments (RTF, ICARRD, VGRF)

3
Key Impacts
  • Destruction of livelihoods of small farmers
    rural labourers, women more affected
  • Large scale CAL, SEZ (64,000 hec) further
    concentration of land
  • Denial of access (physical and economic) to
    productive resources (land, water, CPR),
    Privatisation of water, patents of seeds
  • Evictions, displacements, violations migrations
  • Decrease in per capita landholding from 0.30 hec
    to 0.27 hec
  • Environmental pollution
  • Jobless growth of economy, rural unemployment
    increasing alarmingly
  • Lower wages

4
Land Acquired in Singur
In the name of PUBLIC PURPOSE the Government of
West Bengal COMPULSORILY ACQUIRED 997.11 acres of
fertile agricultural lands in Singur through Land
Acquisition Act 1894 and gave the same to TATA's
(Indias largest MNC) for construction of an
automobile manufacturing unit there in
collaboration with FIAT. The process is declared
complete in only 4 months amidst wide-scale
discontents
5
LIVELIHOODS DESTROYED
  • The majority of the residents (75) are
    small-scale and marginal farmers with an average
    land holding of 2.5 to 5 acres. They depend
    solely on agriculture for livelihoods.
  • The lands acquired by the state are multi
    cropping agricultural lands with a cropping
    density of 220 with a well established system
    of irrigation.
  • Livelihoods of around 30,000 people affected in
    Singur as they were dependent on agrarian economy
    as peasants, share croppers, agricultural
    labourers and other rural stakeholders
  • Peasant women are worst sufferers

6
Peasants faced violations
  • The physical acquisition took place under the
    cordon of a strong police force and no neutral
    presence was allowed in Singur during the process
  • A state of emergency was then imposed on Singur
    (75 days), barring people from outside to enter
    and all public meetings, gatherings and
    processions were banned during the eviction
    process.
  • On 2nd December 2006 police goons ransacked
    the villages, brutally attacked the villagers and
    destroyed properties
  • Women faced severe gender violence
  • on 18 December 2006, 18 year old activist girl,
    Tapashi Mallick, was raped and murdered, her
    charred body was found inside the fenced-off area
    for the proposed TATA Motors small car project.

7
Land Distribution in India up to 2007
8
GAR Challenges Ways Ahead
  • Land Equality Measures to fulfil commitments of
    GAR
  • Rejection of global policies (World Bank model
    of LR) which weaken LR and destroy livelihoods of
    farmers
  • Protection from forced evictions upholding RTF
    principles and obligations (bilateral agreements,
    AOA)
  • Effective participation grassroots democracy to
    be strengthened
  • Recognition Customary Informal and tenancy
    rights to be documented and acknowledged
  • Non Discrimination Womens rights to be
    effectively protected
  • Promotion of peoples alternative Food
    Sovereignty

9
Enabling Victims to take part in the decision
making and implementation
  • A considerable part of one billion Euro (allotted
    for food crisis) should go to CSOs/NGOs/CBOs for
    establishing successful alternatives and ensuring
    realisation of RTF (e.g. social audit, monitoring
    based on VGRF, ICAARD commitments)
  • An inclusive process needs to be established,
    with a bottom up approach, in identifying key
    actors while planning the utilisation of one
    billion Euro

10
We Urge EU Member States to
  • Play a significant role in motivating developing
    nations to mainstream RTF in their food policies
    programmes (respecting implementing
    commitments) and to support smallholders by
    providing those supports/services which they
    need to ensure livelihood security
  • Respect their obligations under RTF and promote
    such policies (protecting promoting
    smallholders) which would address the root causes
    of food crisis and would lead to a sustainable
    solution (including climate change concerns)
  • Broad base the process of developing Guidelines
    on CAL ,State land management, agro-fuel, climate
    change (FAO) etc.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com