Title: CMS Database Issues
1CMS Database Issues
2(No Transcript)
3Production Overview
Sensors
Hybrids
Production Overview
- Quick Overview of Production Process
- Hybrids (2755 TOB 5 types, 500-2613 TEC 3
types) - 1. Receiving / Visual Inspection / Hybrid
Assembly - 2. Testing Bonding Thermal Testing Module
Assembly - Sensors (5510 TOB 2 types, 1000-5226 TEC 4
types) - 1. Receiving / Probing (Special)
- 2. Module Assembly
- Modules (2755 TOB 6 types, 500-2613 TEC 3
types) - 1. Assembly (using hybrids sensors)
- 2. Wire-bonding
- 3. Testing
- Rods ( 460 - 24 types)
- 1. Assembly / Testing / ? / Shipping
Slide 3
-Derek Barge
DOE review, January 20, 2004
4Keeping Track of Things
Sensors
Hybrids
Keeping Track of Things
- What Do we need to keep track of?
- For Hybrids, Sensors, Modules Rods, we need to
know - - Where is it? (What Test Center? UCSB, CERN,
etc.) - - What Type is it? (Module or Hybrid? TEC or TOB?
Single or Stereo?) - - How is it related to other objects?
- - Does it contain any other parts? What are
their serial numbers? - - Is it a part in another container? What is the
containers serial number? - - Has it been Wire-bonded? (hybrids modules
only) - - What channels were NOT bonded successfully?
- - Has it been tested?
- - What channels were faulty and why? Did it Pass
or Fail? - - Is it ready for the next production stage?
- - History Shipping (When was it Made? Bonded?
Tested? Shipped?)
Slide 4
-Derek Barge
DOE review, January 20, 2004
5Data Management
Sensors
Hybrids
Data Management
- Need tools to track parts record information at
different stages of production and centers - System must handle
- 13,480 Total Objects of 46 types
- Requirements
- - Must be Reliable
- - Must be Adaptable, needs to quickly
accommodate changes - - Should be centralized
- - Should be Internet based for accessibility
- - Must be secure
- - Should be easy to use
- - Should be as fast as possible
- What is the CMS collaborations solution?
Slide 5
-Derek Barge
DOE review, January 20, 2004
6TrackerDB
Sensors
Hybrids
TrackerDB
- Oracle (SQL) database for tracking CMS production
- Relational Database format, data stored in
tables - - Center - Sensor Data (ST, QTC)
- - Bonding Data - Gantry Assembly Measurements
- - Object Assembly - History Shipping
- Data is uploaded and stored for later reference
- - Uploading of Module Assembly Wire-bonding
data almost fully automated, Hybrid data will be
automated this month - Queries can be written to get data for
- - A Specific Part (Example time history for a
particular hybrid) - - All parts meeting certain criteria (Example
all modules at UCSB that have been assembled and
not wire-bonded)
Slide 6
-Derek Barge
DOE review, January 20, 2004
7DB Problems
Sensors
Hybrids
DB Problems
- Although the TrackerDB itself is reliable, and
has the potential to meet our needs, - All the interface tools we need either dont
exist or work - - BigBrowser is slow cant track parts through
their containers - - Other interfaces track modules only or sensors
only - - Interface servers go down (PISA server summer
03) - Data Problems (being resolved)
- - Sensors with incorrect or missing data
- - Hybrids received with missing bonding data
- Testing Tables not developed
- - Hybrid Testing Tables not ready until DEC 2003
- - Module testing data structures not sufficient
for UCSB
Slide 7
-Derek Barge
DOE review, January 20, 2004
8Solution
Sensors 2
Sensors
Hybrids
Solution
- Combine TrackerDB local UCSB DB
- Maximize mileage from Tracker DB, rely on it for
- - Sensor Data (unavoidable)
- - Bonding Data (also kept locally)
- - Gantry Data (also kept locally)
- - Relating Object serial numbers (also kept
locally) - - Object Histories Shipping (unavoidable)
- Local UCSB DB System handles TrackerDB
shortfalls - - Hybrid Testing Data (migrating to DB JAN 2004)
- - Module Testing Data
- UCSB web interface designed to
- - Query TrackerDB display results
- - Interface to local testing data
Slide 8
-Derek Barge
DOE review, January 20, 2004
9UCSB Interface Works
DB Problems
Sensors
Hybrids
UCSB Interface Working
- Currently Relying on UCSB Interface for
- Inventory for Hybrids, Sensors Modules, can
sort by - - , Center, Type, Bonding Status, Production
Stage (container?) - Sensor Data
- - Position of Faulty Strips (CAC, IDIEL, ISTRIP,
RPOLY) - - Depletion Voltage (used to pair sensors for
module production) - - Current(Voltage) curve (compared to module
I(V) in module testing) - All Hybrid Module Electrical Testing Data
- Tracking incoming outgoing shipments
- Frame inventory (otherwise untracked)
Slide 9
-Derek Barge
DOE review, January 20, 2004
10UCSB Interface - Main
11UCSB Sensor Inventory
12Sensor 30210314308203
13Hybrid Results
Sensors
Hybrids
Processed Hybrids
- What have we done so far?
- Hybrids (199 processed so far)
- - 160 at UCSB (All wire-bonded)
- - 126 TOB_P_4U (52 in modules)
- - 7 TOB_P_4D (3 in modules)
- - 7 TOB_P_6U (6 in modules)
- - 6 TOB_S_4U (0 in modules)
- - 8 TOB_S_4D (3 in modules)
- - 6 TEC (4 in modules)
- - 11 sent to Fermilab for module production
- - 16 in module at FERMILAB
- - 10 in modules at CERN
- - 1 in module at STRASBOURG
- - 1 in module in TORINO
Slide 13
-Derek Barge
DOE review, January 20, 2004
14Automation
Sensors
Hybrids
Automation
- Tasks previously done by technicians now done
automatically - Example Module Checklist
- - Paper Checklist (9 min / module)
- - find what hybrid, near sensor, and far sensor
are in the module - - lookup channel faults and I(V) curves for both
sensors (PIZA interface) - - manually add sensor I(V) curves
- - Automated Checklist ( 2 min )
- - Enter Module serial number and wait
- Efficiency improvement of at least 7 min /
module, 1.75 hours / day _at_ 15 modules / day - Accuracy improved, no data entry errors
-
Slide 14
-Derek Barge
DOE review, January 20, 2004
15Works in Progress
Sensors
Hybrids
Whats Left?
- Still need systems to manage
- Module Thermal Testing Data
- Rod Assembly Testing Data
- Also Distributed to Fermilab
- Already using UCSB tools for Module checklist
Sensor Data - Still need inventory tools
Slide 15
-Derek Barge
DOE review, January 20, 2004