Title: Evaluation case study
1Evaluation case study www.sane.orgPaul
MorganDirector of Communications
2Evaluation case study www.sane.orgPaul
Morgan
3Evaluation case study www.sane.orgPaul
Morgan
4Evaluation case study www.sane.orgPaul
Morgan
5Evaluation case study www.sane.orgPaul
Morgan
6Evaluation case study www.sane.org WHOis the
target audience?
- 13-18 year olds students
- 19-39 year olds health workers media
consumers families - gt39 year olds health workers media
consumers families - People with an interest in mental illness . . .
7Evaluation case study www.sane.org WHOis the
target audience?
- 13-18 year olds students
- 19-39 year olds health workers media
consumers families - gt39 year olds health workers media
consumers families - People with an interest in mental illness . . .
- But otherwise share the normal characteristics of
their age-group and demographic segment.
8Evaluation case study www.sane.org WHYevaluate?
- To ensure website contributes as effectively as
possible to SANEs Mission - To help Australians affected by mental illness
by - Campaigning for improved services
- Educating the community, consumers, carers and
health workers - Conducting applied research
9Evaluation case study www.sane.org WHYevaluate?
- To ensure website contributes as effectively as
possible to SANEs Mission - To help Australians affected by mental illness
by - Campaigning for improved services
- Educating the community, consumers, carers and
health workers - Conducting applied research
10Evaluation case study www.sane.org WHYevaluate?
- To ensure website contributes as effectively as
possible to SANEs Mission - To help Australians affected by mental illness
by - Campaigning for improved services
- Educating the community, consumers, carers and
health workers - Conducting applied research
11Evaluation case study www.sane.org WHYevaluate?
This means evaluation has to help us do TWO key
things . . .
12Evaluation case study www.sane.org WHYevaluate?
- This means evaluation has to help us do 2 key
things . . . - REACH the right target group, in right way,
and in maximum numbers - ACT on target group to so they are better
informed, they use the shop, they become
involved, and they return
13Evaluation case study www.sane.org WHENdo we
evaluate?
- Constantly!
- To a monthly reporting cycle
- To a 3-monthly management cycle
14Evaluation case study www.sane.org HOWdo we
evaluate?
- Internal hitcounter
- Monitors basic usage patterns . . . From
monthly down to hourly - More useful for comparative purposes than
raw numbers
15(No Transcript)
16Evaluation case study www.sane.org HOWdo we
evaluate?
- Hitwise monitoring
- More sophisticated analysis of performance
and ranking against competitors, charts by
day-week-month, demographics, and upstream
and downstream movement.
17Ranking
18Performance chart
19Upstream analysis
20Evaluation case study www.sane.org HOWdo we
evaluate?
- User feedback
- Can be extremely valuable . . . can be
misleading . . . - Needs careful interpretation.
21Evaluation case study www.sane.org HOWdo we
evaluate?
- Internal informal evaluation
- How does the site feel? . . . Is it
superb . . . And if not, why not? -
- What could we be doing that were not?
- What are others doing that we DONT want to
do? - HON and Bobby checks
22Evaluation case study www.sane.org WHATdo we do
with the results?
- Splash page re-designed
- More frequent change in lead story . . .
- Added popup window with cookie to promote
SANE Charter - More interactivity planned
23Evaluation case study www.sane.org WHATdo we do
with the results?
- Stylesheet changed
- Typeface and colour changed to improve
readability
24Evaluation case study www.sane.org WHATdo we do
with the results?
- HTML as well as PDF
- Factsheets now provided in html format for
those unable to download - PDF documents
25Evaluation case study www.sane.org WHATdo we do
with the results?
- Makeover of website shop
- Shop being redesigned to give faster, more
flexible, more shop-like - experience with facility for ex-tax overseas
customers
26Evaluation case study www.sane.org WHATdo we do
with the results?
- Improvement in search engine pickup
- Consultant being employed to make site more
spider-friendly and improve - pickup by search engines using techniques
other than meta-tags
27Evaluation case study www.sane.org In conclusion
. . .
- Evaluation is constant and built into the
management cycle
28Evaluation case study www.sane.org In conclusion
. . .
- Evaluation is constant and built into the
management cycle - We dont knee-jerk to criticism, but do listen
carefully
29Evaluation case study www.sane.org In conclusion
. . .
- Evaluation is constant and built into the
management cycle - We dont knee-jerk to criticism, but do listen
carefully - Evaluation needs investment and internal
justification
30Evaluation case study www.sane.org In conclusion
. . .
- Evaluation is constant and built into the
management cycle - We dont knee-jerk to criticism, but do listen
carefully - Evaluation needs investment and internal
justification - Evaluation should lead to real change in
operation
31Evaluation case study www.sane.org In conclusion
. . .
- Evaluation is constant and built into the
management cycle - We dont knee-jerk to criticism, but do listen
carefully - Evaluation needs investment and internal
justification - Evaluation should lead to real change in
operation - Change means improving reach and performance
in search of the superb