Evaluation case study - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Evaluation case study

Description:

evaluation case study www.sane.org. Evaluation case study. www.sane.org ... To help Australians affected by mental illness by: Campaigning for improved services ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: PaulM152
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Evaluation case study


1
Evaluation case study www.sane.orgPaul
MorganDirector of Communications
2
Evaluation case study www.sane.orgPaul
Morgan
3
Evaluation case study www.sane.orgPaul
Morgan
4
Evaluation case study www.sane.orgPaul
Morgan
5
Evaluation case study www.sane.orgPaul
Morgan
6
Evaluation case study www.sane.org WHOis the
target audience?
  • 13-18 year olds students
  • 19-39 year olds health workers media
    consumers families
  • gt39 year olds health workers media
    consumers families
  • People with an interest in mental illness . . .

7
Evaluation case study www.sane.org WHOis the
target audience?
  • 13-18 year olds students
  • 19-39 year olds health workers media
    consumers families
  • gt39 year olds health workers media
    consumers families
  • People with an interest in mental illness . . .
  • But otherwise share the normal characteristics of
    their age-group and demographic segment.

8
Evaluation case study www.sane.org WHYevaluate?
  • To ensure website contributes as effectively as
    possible to SANEs Mission
  • To help Australians affected by mental illness
    by
  • Campaigning for improved services
  • Educating the community, consumers, carers and
    health workers
  • Conducting applied research

9
Evaluation case study www.sane.org WHYevaluate?
  • To ensure website contributes as effectively as
    possible to SANEs Mission
  • To help Australians affected by mental illness
    by
  • Campaigning for improved services
  • Educating the community, consumers, carers and
    health workers
  • Conducting applied research

10
Evaluation case study www.sane.org WHYevaluate?
  • To ensure website contributes as effectively as
    possible to SANEs Mission
  • To help Australians affected by mental illness
    by
  • Campaigning for improved services
  • Educating the community, consumers, carers and
    health workers
  • Conducting applied research

11
Evaluation case study www.sane.org WHYevaluate?
This means evaluation has to help us do TWO key
things . . .
12
Evaluation case study www.sane.org WHYevaluate?
  • This means evaluation has to help us do 2 key
    things . . .
  • REACH the right target group, in right way,
    and in maximum numbers
  • ACT on target group to so they are better
    informed, they use the shop, they become
    involved, and they return

13
Evaluation case study www.sane.org WHENdo we
evaluate?
  • Constantly!
  • To a monthly reporting cycle
  • To a 3-monthly management cycle

14
Evaluation case study www.sane.org HOWdo we
evaluate?
  • Internal hitcounter
  • Monitors basic usage patterns . . . From
    monthly down to hourly
  • More useful for comparative purposes than
    raw numbers

15
(No Transcript)
16
Evaluation case study www.sane.org HOWdo we
evaluate?
  • Hitwise monitoring
  • More sophisticated analysis of performance
    and ranking against competitors, charts by
    day-week-month, demographics, and upstream
    and downstream movement.

17
Ranking
18
Performance chart
19
Upstream analysis
20
Evaluation case study www.sane.org HOWdo we
evaluate?
  • User feedback
  • Can be extremely valuable . . . can be
    misleading . . .
  • Needs careful interpretation.

21
Evaluation case study www.sane.org HOWdo we
evaluate?
  • Internal informal evaluation
  • How does the site feel? . . . Is it
    superb . . . And if not, why not?
  • What could we be doing that were not?
  • What are others doing that we DONT want to
    do?
  • HON and Bobby checks

22
Evaluation case study www.sane.org WHATdo we do
with the results?
  • Splash page re-designed
  • More frequent change in lead story . . .
  • Added popup window with cookie to promote
    SANE Charter
  • More interactivity planned

23
Evaluation case study www.sane.org WHATdo we do
with the results?
  • Stylesheet changed
  • Typeface and colour changed to improve
    readability

24
Evaluation case study www.sane.org WHATdo we do
with the results?
  • HTML as well as PDF
  • Factsheets now provided in html format for
    those unable to download
  • PDF documents

25
Evaluation case study www.sane.org WHATdo we do
with the results?
  • Makeover of website shop
  • Shop being redesigned to give faster, more
    flexible, more shop-like
  • experience with facility for ex-tax overseas
    customers

26
Evaluation case study www.sane.org WHATdo we do
with the results?
  • Improvement in search engine pickup
  • Consultant being employed to make site more
    spider-friendly and improve
  • pickup by search engines using techniques
    other than meta-tags

27
Evaluation case study www.sane.org In conclusion
. . .
  • Evaluation is constant and built into the
    management cycle

28
Evaluation case study www.sane.org In conclusion
. . .
  • Evaluation is constant and built into the
    management cycle
  • We dont knee-jerk to criticism, but do listen
    carefully

29
Evaluation case study www.sane.org In conclusion
. . .
  • Evaluation is constant and built into the
    management cycle
  • We dont knee-jerk to criticism, but do listen
    carefully
  • Evaluation needs investment and internal
    justification

30
Evaluation case study www.sane.org In conclusion
. . .
  • Evaluation is constant and built into the
    management cycle
  • We dont knee-jerk to criticism, but do listen
    carefully
  • Evaluation needs investment and internal
    justification
  • Evaluation should lead to real change in
    operation

31
Evaluation case study www.sane.org In conclusion
. . .
  • Evaluation is constant and built into the
    management cycle
  • We dont knee-jerk to criticism, but do listen
    carefully
  • Evaluation needs investment and internal
    justification
  • Evaluation should lead to real change in
    operation
  • Change means improving reach and performance
    in search of the superb
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com