Title: RICARDO RODRIGUEZ
1(No Transcript)
2FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY
TEAM MEMBERS
- RICARDO RODRIGUEZ
- MELANIE STRAUB
- RYON PLANCER
- YURFA GLENNY
- LUIS CRISTIANI
- DARYL HILDOER
PROUDLY PRESENTS
3ANALYSIS INNOVATIVE DESIGN OF A
REVERSE OSMOSIS PRETREATMENT UNIT
FOR OGDEN MARTIN SYSTEMS OF LEE, INC..
4OGDEN MARTIN SYSTEMS OF LEE, INC.
SOLID WASTE RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY
BACKGROUND
CONVERTS 1200 TONS/DAY OF WASTE TO ENERGY
RECEIVES WASTE FROM TWO COUNTIES, LEE AND HENDRY
5OBJECTIVES
- REDUCE FOULING OF RO MEMBRANES
- REPLACE PROCESS WATER WITH 100
- RECLAIMED WATER
6OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION
I. INTRODUCTION
A. BACKGROUND
B. OBJECTIVES
II. FRAMEWORK
III. EXISTING CONDITIONS
IV. FUTURE CONDITIONS
7OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION
V. RO PRETREATMENT ALTERNATIVES
VI. ALTERNATIVE REVERSE OSMOSIS PRETREATMENT
DESIGN
VII. PRESENT VALUE ANALYSIS
VIII. CONCLUSION
8FRAMEWORK
- ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS
- DO NOT PERTAIN TO OGDEN MARTIN
- INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF RECLAIMED
- WITH 100 RECLAIMED WATER
9FRAMEWORK
- LOWER SDI VALUES TO LESS THAN 5 ppm
- EXISTING RO UNIT CAN HANDLE A
- FLOW OF 100 GPM
- A MAXIMUM PAYBACK PERIOD OF
- 2-3 YEARS IS REQUIRED
10EXISTING CONDITIONS
11EXISTING CONDITIONS
- UNUSED CARBON ADSORPTION UNIT
- COSTS 250,000 TO RE-IMPLEMENT
- 2-5 MICRON FILTERS WHICH CONSISTS
- OF 8 SPIRAL, COTTON FILTERS
- RO UNIT IS USED ONCE A MONTH FOR
- MAINTENANCE REASONS
12EXISTING CONDITIONS
- THE DEMINERALIZER THEN
- RECEIVES 50 GPM FROM THE
- RO UNIT
- THE REMAINDER OF THE WATER IS
- DIVIDED BETWEEN THE COOLING
- TOWER AND THE RO REJECT
- FINALLY THE WATER WILL BE FED
- INTO THE BOILER
13FUTURE CONDITIONS
- THE ORIGINAL 5 MICRON FILTER
- BECOMES A PRE-FILTER
- A MF UNIT WITH A O.2 MICRON
- CELLULOSE ACETATE MEMBRANE
14FUTURE CONDITIONS
- MORE ADVANCED, COST EFFECTIVE,
- AND IMPROVED MEMBRANES
- OUTSOURCING CAN BE IMPLEMENTED
15FUTURE CONDITIONS
16RO PRETREATMENT ALTERNATIVES
CONSIDERED ALTERNATIVES
- OZONATION
- ULTRAFILTRATION
- MICROFILTRATION
- CARBON ADSORPTION
- MULTIMEDIA FILTRATION
- COAGULATION FLOCCULATION
17RO PRETREATMENT ALTERNATIVES
RATING ALTERNATIVES CRITERIA
WEIGHTED SUM METHOD METHOD
- TECHNICAL (10)
- ENVIRONMENTAL (6)
- ECONOMIC ASPECTS (10)
- SPACE AVAILABILITY (6)
- SAFETY (6)
- INNOVATION (5)
18RO PRETREATMENT ALTERNATIVES
WEIGHTED SUM METHOD RESULTS
19RO PRETREATMENT DESIGN
INTRODUCTION
- ENGINEERING SPECIFICATIONS
- FOR MICROFILTRATION
- SELECTION OF MICROFILTRATION
- MEMBRANES
- COST IS THE DRIVING FORCE OF THE
- DESIGN CRITERIA
20RO PRETREATMENT DESIGN
NEED FOR PILOT PROGRAM
- REAL WORLD RESULTS FOR SPECIFIC
- TASK
- SOUND ENGINEERING PRACTICE
- SOME UNCERTAINTIES IN FILTERED
- WATER COMPOSITION
21RO PRETREATMENT DESIGN
MICROFILTRATION BACKGROUND
- ONE OF THE SIMPLEST MEMBRANE
- SEPARATION PROCESS
- MEMBRANE PORES RANGE FROM 0.1-
- 20 MICRONS
- LOW PRESSURE MEMBRANE FILTRATION
22RO PRETREATMENT DESIGN
MICROFILTRATION MEMBRANES
23RO PRETREATMENT DESIGN
TWO MODULES OF OPERATION
24RO PRETREATMENT DESIGN
CROSSFLOW
- CAKE-LAYER DOES NOT BUILD
- INDEFINITELY
- EFFECTIVE IN CONTROLLING
- CONCENTRATION-POLARIZATION AND
- ASSOCIATED CAKE BUILD UP
- HIGH FLUXES MAINTAINED OVER
- PROLONGED TIME PERIODS
25RO PRETREATMENT DESIGN
DEAD END FLOW
- UNIT MUST BE STOPPED
- PERIODICALLY FOR PARTICLE
- REMOVAL OR FILTER REPLACEMENT
- BY NATURE A BATCH PROCESS
26RO PRETREATMENT DESIGN
MOST COMMON MODULES OF MATERIALS AND GEOMETRY
27RO PRETREATMENT DESIGN
BASIS OF DESIGN
- 50 PARTICLES FROM 0-1 MICRONS
- SDI IS CALCULATED FROM RATE OF
- PLUGGING OF A 0.45 MICRON
- MEMBRANE FILTER
- SELECTION OF 0.2 MICRON HOLLOW
- FIBER CELLULOSE ACETATE MEMBRANE
28RO PRETREATMENT DESIGN
SPECIFICS FOR SIZING CALCULATIONS
- OPERATES AT 25 PSI, PUMP
- VELOCITY 15-17 FT/S
- SURFACE AREA IS 360 FT2 PER
- ELEMENT OF 1 METER IN LENGTH
29RO PRETREATMENT DESIGN
SPECIFICS FOR SIZING CALCULATIONS
30RO PRETREATMENT DESIGN
SIZING CALCULATIONS
- EACH MODULE CONTAINS 6 ELEMENTS, 48/6 8
MODULES
31RO PRETREATMENT DESIGN
pH OPTIMIZATION AND ANTISCALANT
- pH FOR FILTER WATER HAS AVERAGE OF 7.6
- BRING pH DOWN TO 5.5 (RULE OF THUMB
- IS TO LOWER ALK. BY 80)
32RO PRETREATMENT DESIGN
pH OPTIMIZATION AND ANTISCALANT
- ALKALINITY FOR FILTER WATER
- 141 ppm CaCO3
33RO PRETREATMENT DESIGN
pH OPTIMIZATION AND ANTISCALANT
- CONVERSION FACTOR OF
- 120 FOR ppm lbs/kgal
- STANDARD ADDITION OF ANTISCALANT
- TO TREAT FOR MEMBRANE SCALANT IS
- 5ppm 5ppm/120 0.041 lb/kgal
34COST ASSESMENT
- CRITERIA TO BE CONSIDERED
- REQUIRED RETURN PERIOD OF 2-3 YEARS
- AVAILABLE CAPITAL INVESTMENT
- 70,000/YEAR DURING 3 YEARS LAPSE.
- MICROFILTRATION MEETS OUR
- COST REQUIREMENTS
35COST ASSESMENT
MICROFILTRATION SYSTEM PHASE I
INITIAL CAPITAL COST
36COST ASSESMENT
FIRST YEAR OF IMPLEMENTATION
TOTAL INVESTMENT FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF DESIGN
96,100.00
37COST ASSESMENT
COST AFTER IMPLEMENTATION
38COST ASSESMENT
SAVINGS BY USING 100 RECLAIMED WATER 47,000.00
TOTAL PHASE I COST 127,600.00
AFTER CALCULATIONS RETURN PERIOD FOR RO
PRETREATMENT SYSTEM 2.7 YEARS
39AN INNOVATIVE SOLUTION
FOR A PLIGHT TODAY
- THROUGH IN-DEPTH INVESTIGATION
- MICROFILTRATION IS THE BEST SOLUTION
- MICROFILTRATION
- RELIABLE
- CAPABLE
- COST EFFECTIVE
- INNOVATIVE
40ACKNOLEDGMENT
Dr. David Shen, Ph. D, P.E., Chairman FIU Civil
and Environmental Engineering Department Ken
Reardon, P.E., Student Activities Chairman,
FWEA Mark Mattina, P.E., Ogden Martin
Representative Jaime E. Staton, Applications
Chemist, ECOLOCHEM INTERNATIONAL, INC. Mr. Jeff
Dunn, WATERLINK Pure Water Division, West Palm
Beach Mark Drummund, E.I. Mr. Bill Messer, CHEM
TREAT INC. Professor Sanchez, Presentation
Advisor
41INNOVATIVE SOLUTION
MICROFILTRATION PREVAILS ABOVE OTHER ALTERNATIVES