CE ROC Meeting

1
CE ROC Meeting

• Athens, Greece
• 21th April 2005

2
Agenda

• Status and Future of Resouces in CE ROC 10
• Tomasz Szepieniec (CYFRONET)
• CE ROC Monitoring Framework 15
• Pawel Wolniewicz (PSNC)
• User Support - Status and future 15
• (additionally information on new resources at
  ICM site)
• Wojciech Wislicki (ICM)
• User Support - Remarks
• Jan Kunicek
• VOCE - Current Status 15
• Daniel Kouril (CESNET)
• CE Certification Testbed - Current Status 15
• Marcin Radecki (CYFRONET)
• Operational Status in CZ
• Jiri Chudoba (CESNET)
• HunGrid - the Hungarian VO of the EGEE Grid
• Gergely Debreczeni (SZTAKI)
• Experience with IA64 in LCG/EGEE 10
• Piotr Siwczak (PSNC)

3
Status and Future of Resouces in CE ROC

• Tomasz Szepieniec
• CE ROC Meeting
• Athens, Greece
• 21th April 2005

4
Status of CE ROC

• Current status
• 11 RCs operational, 673 CPUs, 15TB
• 3 new RCs from not EGEE member institutes
  (Hephy-Viena, IEPSAS-Kosice, TU-Kosice)
• the new procedure of site registration and
  certification implemented and validated
• Certification of 1 new sites (SZTAKI-Budapest) in
  progress
• Upgrade to 2.4.0 in progress
• Pre-production service
• deployed at CYFRONET
• CE ROC Monitoring
• http//ras.man.poznan.pl/egee/monitoring/
• Request Tracker for user support
• https//terier.fuw.edu.pl/

5
Survey results

• InputsAustria, ICM, PCSN, KFKI-RMKI, CESNET,
  IISAS, SZTAKI
• Still waiting NIFI, JSI
• Resources
• CPUs (table on next page)
• Storage planned in 15PM (declaration 32TB,
  current 15TB)
• 2TB - AustrianGrid, 10TB -CESNET, 10TB -
  CYFRONET, 3TB ICM, 0.3 - IISAS, 1.3TB -
  KFKI-RMKI, 2TB PSNC, ? SZTAKI, 1.2TB -
  EIPSAS-Kosice, 0.1TB - TU-Kosice, 2TB -
  FMPHI-Bratislava, 0 -HEPHY-Viennna
• Overall 31.9

6
Survey results
7
ROC daily routine

• Operations
• Weekly operations meetings and reports
• Implementation of site registration and
  certification procedure (3 new sites)
• Supervising of Savannah/GGUS tickes flow
• Monitoring and testing
• Upgrades coordination
• Administrative
• ROC Managers meeting and reports
• Checking resources assesment
• Inputs to deliverable/QRs/SA1 presentation, etc.

8
Results
Q1 Monitoring Should it be done automatically
(every day) from Poznan? A1 Admins will have
possibility to decide! Q2 User Support can we
have 2 RT? Interoperability between and with
GGUS? A2 Q3 Human capacity for User
Support? A3 Every institution have to delegate a
person (or more) for US. Q4