Final PhD Defense - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Final PhD Defense

Description:

Final PhD Defense – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:6439
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: researchS5
Category:
Tags: phd | aree | defense | final

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Final PhD Defense


1
Final PhD Defense
  • FINITE ELEMENT MODELING
  • OF
  • HEPATIC RADIO-FREQUENCY ABLATION

DIETER HAEMMERICH  UNIVERSITY OF
WISCONSIN-MADISON DEPARTMENT OF BIOMEDICAL
ENGINEERING
2
Introduction
  • Hepatic tumors belong to the most common types of
    cancer
  • Estimated annual mortality in US of 56,000
  • Surgical resection is only possible less than 30
    of the cases
  • The major clinically used alternative treatment
    methods with the US are RF ablation and cryo
    ablation
  • Other ablative methods under investigation are
    microwave ablation, laser ablation, ethanol
    injection, ultrasound ablation

3
Cryo Ablation
  • Cryo ablation uses cold (- 100C) to kill tumor
    tissue
  • Open surgery is necessary (bleeding)
  • Local recurrence rates may be lower than RF
    ablation
  • Multiple probes can be used simultaneously
  • Lesion is more predictable

4
Radio Frequency Ablation
  • RF ablation was introduced in the 1990s for
    treatment of hepatic tumors
  • RF (500 kHz) is used to heat tissue above 50C
    (-gt coagulation necrosis)
  • Current is applied via catheter, that can be
    introduced transcutaneously (minimally invasive)
  • Patient under local anesthesia and conscious
    sedation, or light general anesthesia
  • Current travels between catheter and dispersive
    electrode (i.e. ground pad)

5
RF Ablation Catheter Types
6
Ablation Procedure
Probe insertion
Extension of prongs
RF current application
7
Parameters
  • Treatment time is 10-30 minutes for a single
    application
  • Multiple applications are usually necessary for
    treatment of a single tumor
  • Current max. lesion sizes are 4 cm
  • Applied power of 50 200 W
  • Temperature Control (95 C) or Impedance Control
    is used to avoid charring

8
Shortcomings
  • High local recurrence rates ( 40)
  • Large vessels act as heat sinks, that may prevent
    destruction of tumor cells close to them
  • Limited lesion size makes multiple applications
    necessary
  • Insufficient imaging modalities

Multiple applications necessary to cover large
tumor
9
FEM models
  • We have to solve the Bioheat Equation

J Current Density k Thermal Conductivity E
Electric Field hbl heat transfer coefficient
(determines perfusion) c Heat
Capacity ? Mass Density
  • We divide the model (tissue, probe) into small
    tetrahedral elements differential equation -gt
    algebraic equations

10
Rita model 30 umbrella probe
11
1. Bipolar Ablation
12
Modified Catheter
13
  • Effect due to more homogenous electric field is
    negligible

14
Results of in-vivo experiments
  • Monopolar lesions had 3.9 1.8 cm3 volume (n7)
  • Bipolar lesions had 12.2 3 cm3 volume (n10)

Bipolar Lesion
15
  • Disadvantage Deposited power cannot be
    controlled independentely at the two probes
  • Non-uniform heating can result

16
2. Multiple Probe RF Ablation
  • One Advantage of cryo ablation is the option to
    use multiple probes simultaneously
  • Large Lesions can be covered better
  • Multiple tumors can be treated simultaneously

17
FEM Results
Alternating Monopolar
Monopolar
Bipolar
18
  • Bipolar mode creates highest temperature between
    probes, but can only be used with 2 probes.
    Positioning of probes is important. Does not
    allow independent control of power deposition.
  • Monopolar mode creates lowest temperature between
    probes due to electric shielding
  • Alternating monopolar mode creates slightly lower
    temperature than bipolar. Can be used with any
    number of probes. Allows control of power
    deposition at each probe.

19
ex-vivo Experiments
20
Experimental Conditions
  • 2 pieces of liver tissue (26C, 16C) were
    immersed in 0.9 saline solution
  • One probe was inserted into each piece
  • 12 min. ablation at 95C was performed

21
Results
  • Alternating monopolar method allows independent
    control of multiple probes (theoretically
    unlimited number)

22
3. Bipolar RF Ablation next to blood vessels
  • Local tumor recurrence is associated with tumor
    cell survival next to blood vessels
  • Can Bipolar ablation create lesions closer to
    blood vessels ?

23
Bipolar Ablation with two 10-prong
probes. Distance from vessel 5 mm
24
Results
Monopolar, d2.3 mm
Bipolar asymmetric, d1.8 mm
Bipolar symmetric, d1.0 mm
25
Current Density
  • Does blood vessel conductivity have significant
    impact on lesion formation ?

26
Normal blood conductivity
Altered blood conductivity
27
  • Lesion shape is not significantly altered by
    modified blood conductivity

28
Conclusion
  • Bipolar Ablation creates lesions closer to blood
    vessels
  • Symmetric Bipolar Configuration shows best
    performance, but may be difficult to perform in
    practice

29
4. RF ablation at audio frequencies
  • Our previous studies of liver metastases in rats
    showed significant differences in conductivity of
    normal vs. tumor tissue in rats

30
  • HypothesisIf we perform RF ablation at lower
    frequencies, we might be able to preferentially
    target tumor tissue

Tumor, d40 mm
Tumor, d20 mm
31
Current Density for 20 mm diameter tumor
f 500 kHz
f 20 kHz
  • There were no significant differences in lesion
    for the 40 mm diameter tumor

32
Temperature for 20 mm diameter tumor
f 500 kHz
f 20 kHz
33
Additional Lesion for ablation at 20 kHz
34
Conclusion
  • If probe is completely submerged in tumor, no
    differences in lesion are observed
  • If probe is partially submerged in tumor, RF
    ablation at audio frequencies preferentially
    targets tumor tissue
  • Applied frequency should be limited to 20 kHz
    to avoid excitation of tissue

35
Acknowledgements
  • Block, W.F.
  • Johnson, C.D.
  • Lee jr., F.T.
  • Mahvi, D.M.
  • Staelin, T.S.
  • Tompkins, W.J.
  • Tsai, J.Z.
  • Tungjitkusolmun, S.
  • Van der Weide, D.
  • Webster, J.G.
  • Wright, A.W.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com