Title: LECTURE 8 Stabilization policy
1LECTURE 8Stabilization policy
Øystein Børsum 7th March 2006
2Overview of forthcoming lectures
- Lecture 8 Stabilization policies
- Goals for stabilization policies Stable output
and inflation - Optimal policy rule Demand and supply shocks
- Lecture 9 Limits to stabilization policies
- Rational expectations and the Policy
Ineffectiveness Proposition, the Ricardian
Equivalence Theorem and the Lucas Critique - Policy rules versus discretion Credibility of
economic policy - Real business cycles (section 19.4)
- Lecture 10 Open economy
- Features of a small, open economy with perfect
capital mobility - Aggregate demand and aggregate supply in the open
economy - Long-term macroeconomic equilibrium in the open
economy
3Overview of stabilization policy in the AS-AD
model with a Taylor rule
- Stable output and stable inflation are popular
policy goals - In the case of demand shocks, the adequate policy
response with respect to output and inflation
stabilization is the same - In the case of supply shocks, there is a clear
trade-off between the two goals - The priorities of monetary policy are represented
by the choice of parameters in the Taylor rule - The optimal policy rule depends on whether supply
or demand shocks are dominant, as well as policy
preferences - Within a framework of rules-based policies,
activist fiscal policy and monetary policy are
essentially the same Demand management
Therefore, they lead to the same outcomes and
have the same limitations
4Presumption A desire for stabilization policies
- Hypothesis The observed aversion to fluctuations
in output and inflation can be represented by a
social loss function
5Motivating output stability as a policy goal
- Consumers prefer to smooth consumption over time,
but may not be able to do so Credit constraints,
insurance market imperfections - High consumer risk aversion?
- Stable income (output) may help consumers to
smooth consumption - Labor market inefficiencies probably increase
when employment fluctuates - Uneven distribution of the cost of recession
(low-paid, unskilled and young workers suffer
most) Successful stabilization policy may help
to improve the distribution of income and welfare
6Motivating stable inflation as a policy goal
- Surprisingly hard to motivate in theory
- A fluctuating rate of inflation generates
- Inflation forecast errors Households will regret
saving, investment and labor supply decisions - Arbitrary redistribution of real income and
wealth between creditors and debtors - Protection against unanticipated inflation
Indexation of nominal contracts - Indexation is rare in real life, probably because
the contracting parties (e.g., employers and
employees) focus on different price indices
7The inflation target should be low and positive
- Costs of a fully anticipated inflation
- Shoe-leather costs
- Menu costs
- Distortion of relative prices (due to
unsynchronized price setting) - Tax distortions (due to a non-indexed tax system)
- The case for a positive target inflation rate
- Lower bound on the nominal interest rate
(liquidity trap) - Downwards nominal wage and price rigidity
- Quality improvements of goods and services are
not fully captured by official price indices - Most OECD countries aim at Low and stable
inflation with a target rate of 2 2½
8Policy based on rules vs. discretionary policy
- Examples of policy rules
- The Taylor rule (flexible inflation targeting)
- A fixed exchange rate policy
- The Friedman rule (constant money growth)
- Discretionary policy Policy makers react in an
ad-hoc manner to the specific circumstances of
the situation, using all relevant available
information - Trade-off Credibility vs. flexibility
- Credibility anchors inflation expectations The
legacy of stabilization policies in the 70s and
80s
9AS-AD model (restated)
10Policy problem Find the monetary policy that
minimizes the social loss function
- At first, we disregard fiscal policy
- AD curve
- AS curve
- Social loss function
- Decision variables (in the Taylor rule) h and b
11Deriving the variances of output and inflation in
the general case
- Demand shock variable z (see chapter 17)
- The asymptotic (long-run) variances of output and
inflation become (see appendix chapter 20)
12Case 1 An economy with only demand shocks
- Only demand shocks
- The variances of output and inflation simplify
- Higher values of h and b reduce both variances
No trade-off between the inflation gap and the
output gap
13Higher weight on the output stabilization (higher
b) reduces both the output gap and the inflation
gap
Illustration of the short-run effects of a
negative demand shock under different weights on
the monetary policy parameter b
14Conclusion No policy trade-off in an economy
with only demand shocks
- The central bank should react to demand shocks by
pursuing a countercyclical monetary policy (b gt
0). - There is no trade-off between stabilizing output
and stabilizing inflation when business cycles
are driven by demand shocks. - When faced with demand shocks, the central bank
should react as strongly as possible to the
output and inflation gaps.
15Case 2 An economy with only supply shocks
- Only supply shocks
- The variances of output and inflation simplify
- A low variance of output can only be achieved at
the expense of a high variance of inflation, and
vice versa A clear trade-off between the
inflation gap and the output gap
where
16With supply shocks, there is a clear trade-off
between the inflation gap and the output gap
Illustration of the short-run effects of a
negative supply shock under different designs of
monetary policy
17Conclusion Clear policy trade-off in an economy
with only supply shocks
- If policy makers primarily seek to stabilize
output, b should be positive and high
(countercyclical policy) and h should be close to
zero so that the AD curve becomes steep. - If policy makers primarily seek to stabilize
inflation, b should be negative (procyclical
policy) and h should be high so that the AD curve
becomes flat.
18The general case In optimum, there is a
trade-off between the output gap and the
inflation gap
- Minimize the social loss function
- First-order conditions with respect to h and b
- Implications In a social optimum, a smaller
variance of output can only be achieved at the
expense of a larger variance of inflation, and
vice versa
19Optimal monetary policy design depends on which
shocks are dominant and the policy preferences
Optimal monetary policy under the Taylor rule
20Rules-based fiscal stabilization policy work in
the same way as rules-based monetary policy
- Fiscal policy rule
- Monetary policy follows the Taylor rule
- The AD curve with activist fiscal policy
21Decreased interest in fiscal stabilization policy
- Policy lags are seen to disadvantage fiscal
policy relative to monetary policy - Recognition lag (data measurement)
- Decisions lag (political system)
- Implementation lag (administrative process)
- Effectiveness lag (from change in instrument to
effect in target) - Direct constraints on the room for fiscal policy
- EU Maastricht treaty (1992) and the Stability
and Growth Pact (1997) - Credibility problems (cf. lecture 10) are likely
to be more pronounced for fiscal than for
monetary policy