LECTURE 8 Stabilization policy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

LECTURE 8 Stabilization policy

Description:

Goals for stabilization policies: Stable output and inflation ... Credibility anchors inflation expectations: The legacy of 'stabilization' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:361
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: ystein6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: LECTURE 8 Stabilization policy


1
LECTURE 8Stabilization policy
Øystein Børsum 7th March 2006
2
Overview of forthcoming lectures
  • Lecture 8 Stabilization policies
  • Goals for stabilization policies Stable output
    and inflation
  • Optimal policy rule Demand and supply shocks
  • Lecture 9 Limits to stabilization policies
  • Rational expectations and the Policy
    Ineffectiveness Proposition, the Ricardian
    Equivalence Theorem and the Lucas Critique
  • Policy rules versus discretion Credibility of
    economic policy
  • Real business cycles (section 19.4)
  • Lecture 10 Open economy
  • Features of a small, open economy with perfect
    capital mobility
  • Aggregate demand and aggregate supply in the open
    economy
  • Long-term macroeconomic equilibrium in the open
    economy

3
Overview of stabilization policy in the AS-AD
model with a Taylor rule
  • Stable output and stable inflation are popular
    policy goals
  • In the case of demand shocks, the adequate policy
    response with respect to output and inflation
    stabilization is the same
  • In the case of supply shocks, there is a clear
    trade-off between the two goals
  • The priorities of monetary policy are represented
    by the choice of parameters in the Taylor rule
  • The optimal policy rule depends on whether supply
    or demand shocks are dominant, as well as policy
    preferences
  • Within a framework of rules-based policies,
    activist fiscal policy and monetary policy are
    essentially the same Demand management
    Therefore, they lead to the same outcomes and
    have the same limitations

4
Presumption A desire for stabilization policies
  • Hypothesis The observed aversion to fluctuations
    in output and inflation can be represented by a
    social loss function

5
Motivating output stability as a policy goal
  • Consumers prefer to smooth consumption over time,
    but may not be able to do so Credit constraints,
    insurance market imperfections
  • High consumer risk aversion?
  • Stable income (output) may help consumers to
    smooth consumption
  • Labor market inefficiencies probably increase
    when employment fluctuates
  • Uneven distribution of the cost of recession
    (low-paid, unskilled and young workers suffer
    most) Successful stabilization policy may help
    to improve the distribution of income and welfare

6
Motivating stable inflation as a policy goal
  • Surprisingly hard to motivate in theory
  • A fluctuating rate of inflation generates
  • Inflation forecast errors Households will regret
    saving, investment and labor supply decisions
  • Arbitrary redistribution of real income and
    wealth between creditors and debtors
  • Protection against unanticipated inflation
    Indexation of nominal contracts
  • Indexation is rare in real life, probably because
    the contracting parties (e.g., employers and
    employees) focus on different price indices

7
The inflation target should be low and positive
  • Costs of a fully anticipated inflation
  • Shoe-leather costs
  • Menu costs
  • Distortion of relative prices (due to
    unsynchronized price setting)
  • Tax distortions (due to a non-indexed tax system)
  • The case for a positive target inflation rate
  • Lower bound on the nominal interest rate
    (liquidity trap)
  • Downwards nominal wage and price rigidity
  • Quality improvements of goods and services are
    not fully captured by official price indices
  • Most OECD countries aim at Low and stable
    inflation with a target rate of 2 2½

8
Policy based on rules vs. discretionary policy
  • Examples of policy rules
  • The Taylor rule (flexible inflation targeting)
  • A fixed exchange rate policy
  • The Friedman rule (constant money growth)
  • Discretionary policy Policy makers react in an
    ad-hoc manner to the specific circumstances of
    the situation, using all relevant available
    information
  • Trade-off Credibility vs. flexibility
  • Credibility anchors inflation expectations The
    legacy of stabilization policies in the 70s and
    80s

9
AS-AD model (restated)
10
Policy problem Find the monetary policy that
minimizes the social loss function
  • At first, we disregard fiscal policy
  • AD curve
  • AS curve
  • Social loss function
  • Decision variables (in the Taylor rule) h and b

11
Deriving the variances of output and inflation in
the general case
  • Demand shock variable z (see chapter 17)
  • The asymptotic (long-run) variances of output and
    inflation become (see appendix chapter 20)

12
Case 1 An economy with only demand shocks
  • Only demand shocks
  • The variances of output and inflation simplify
  • Higher values of h and b reduce both variances
    No trade-off between the inflation gap and the
    output gap

13
Higher weight on the output stabilization (higher
b) reduces both the output gap and the inflation
gap
Illustration of the short-run effects of a
negative demand shock under different weights on
the monetary policy parameter b
14
Conclusion No policy trade-off in an economy
with only demand shocks
  • The central bank should react to demand shocks by
    pursuing a countercyclical monetary policy (b gt
    0).
  • There is no trade-off between stabilizing output
    and stabilizing inflation when business cycles
    are driven by demand shocks.
  • When faced with demand shocks, the central bank
    should react as strongly as possible to the
    output and inflation gaps.

15
Case 2 An economy with only supply shocks
  • Only supply shocks
  • The variances of output and inflation simplify
  • A low variance of output can only be achieved at
    the expense of a high variance of inflation, and
    vice versa A clear trade-off between the
    inflation gap and the output gap

where
16
With supply shocks, there is a clear trade-off
between the inflation gap and the output gap
Illustration of the short-run effects of a
negative supply shock under different designs of
monetary policy
17
Conclusion Clear policy trade-off in an economy
with only supply shocks
  • If policy makers primarily seek to stabilize
    output, b should be positive and high
    (countercyclical policy) and h should be close to
    zero so that the AD curve becomes steep.
  • If policy makers primarily seek to stabilize
    inflation, b should be negative (procyclical
    policy) and h should be high so that the AD curve
    becomes flat.

18
The general case In optimum, there is a
trade-off between the output gap and the
inflation gap
  • Minimize the social loss function
  • First-order conditions with respect to h and b
  • Implications In a social optimum, a smaller
    variance of output can only be achieved at the
    expense of a larger variance of inflation, and
    vice versa

19
Optimal monetary policy design depends on which
shocks are dominant and the policy preferences
Optimal monetary policy under the Taylor rule
20
Rules-based fiscal stabilization policy work in
the same way as rules-based monetary policy
  • Fiscal policy rule
  • Monetary policy follows the Taylor rule
  • The AD curve with activist fiscal policy

21
Decreased interest in fiscal stabilization policy
  • Policy lags are seen to disadvantage fiscal
    policy relative to monetary policy
  • Recognition lag (data measurement)
  • Decisions lag (political system)
  • Implementation lag (administrative process)
  • Effectiveness lag (from change in instrument to
    effect in target)
  • Direct constraints on the room for fiscal policy
  • EU Maastricht treaty (1992) and the Stability
    and Growth Pact (1997)
  • Credibility problems (cf. lecture 10) are likely
    to be more pronounced for fiscal than for
    monetary policy
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com