SCECCME Pathway 2 Meeting

1
SCEC/CME Pathway 2 Meeting
Phil Maechling 9 June 2003 maechlin_at_usc.edu http/
/www.scec.org/cme
2
Agenda

• 900 am Introduction/Project Status/Pathway 2
  Workplan/Build 2 - Phil M.
• 915 am SCEC/CME Framework Development - Phil M.
• 930 am Etree Library - Dave O'Hallaron
• Implementation
• Applications of Library
• Metadata handling
• 1030 am Standard Source Definition -
  Jacobo/Steve/Kim
• 1100 am Break
• 1115 pm Grid Infrastructure Status - Carl
  Kesselman/Hongsuda
• 1145 am AWM Validation Project - Steve Day
• Problems being tested
• Models being used
• Data processing path
• Metadata handling
• Validation process
• Relationship between Validation and
  Pathway 2
• 1230 pm Lunch
• 100 pm Community Model Interface - Linus Kamb

3
General Goals of Todays Meeting

• Heres a chance to talk with and exchange
  information with collaborators.
• We have a mix of Geoscientists and IT researchers
  that is unique.
• Use this chance.

4
General Goals of Todays Meeting

• Build common understanding about the current
  status of the SCEC/CME project.
• Build common understanding of what the project
  will produce in the remaining development.
• Identify what needs to be done by us to reach a
  useful result on this project.

5
General Goals of Todays Meeting

• Purpose it not to convince ourselves everything
  is great, or that we are on track.
• We need accurate assessment of state of project
  and problems identified. Proposed solutions are
  good, but not necessary at this time.

6
SCEC/CME Project Development

• 5 Year funding of 10M or 2M/year distributed to
  collaborating organizations including the
  following (Organizations alphabetically and
  example area of work).
• Carnegie Mellon Pathway 2 AWM Development/Data
  Representation.
• IRIS Metadata Standards/Distributed Access to
  Datasets.
• SCEC ITR Project Management/System
  Integration/Intern Program
• SDSU Pathway 2 AWM Development
• UCSB Pathway 2 AWM Development
• UCSD/SDSC Digital Library/Metadata Handling
• UCSD/SIO Pathway 3 Rupture Dynamics Model
  Development
• USC Pathway 2 AWM/Pathway 4 Inversions
• USC/ISI Grid Computing
• USC/ISI - Knowledge Representation and Reasoning
• USGS Pathway 1 Seismic Hazard Analysis Software
  (no funding for Fed Employees).

7
SCEC/CME Project Development

• IT/Geosciences Collaboration ensured by both IT
  scientists and Geoscientists represented in most
  working groups including the following
• Visualization Software
• Metadata Definitions
• CVM Standardized Interface
• CFM Standardized Interface
• Standardized 4D-Wavefield Data Format
• Digital Library Installation and Usage
• Grid Computing
• Interactive Knowledge and Acquisition
• Knowledge Representation and Reasoning
• Pathway 3 Development
• Pathway 2 Development
• Pathway 1 Development
• SCEC/CME Framework Environment Development

8
SCEC/CME Project Development

• SCEC/CME ITR is an National Science Foundation
  (NSF) Information Technology Research (ITR) Large
  Project funded in 2001.
• Project Schedule

Oct-2002
Oct-2003
Oct-2004
Oct-2001
Oct-2005
Oct-2006
June - 2003 20 months out of 60 months completed
9
SCEC/CME Project Development

• SCEC/CME ITR is an National Science Foundation
  (NSF) Information Technology Research (ITR) Large
  Project funded in 2001.
• System Release Schedule

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15
Oct-2002
Oct-2003
Oct-2004
Oct-2001
Oct-2005
Oct-2006
March 31 - 2003 SCEC/CME Release 1 Delivered
10
SCEC/CME Project Development

• SCEC/CME Release 2 Due June 30 (3 weeks)
• Please contribute your work for integration at
  SCEC/USC.

11
SCEC/CME Project Development

• SCEC/CME Pathway 2 work plan produced in April
• Task identified and order identified.
• Action items from todays meeting will be
  integrated into Plan.
• Plan reflects general consensus of what needs to
  be done to reach a successful outcome.

12
CME Development Goal

• Conceptual Development Target
• The CME Year 2 system will produce predictive
  datasets from Pathway 1 and Pathway 2 that can
  be compared to an observed dataset.

13
CME Development Goal

• Selected predictive dataset is a ground motion
  map (PGV Map, PGD Map, or Spectral Response Map)
  of Los Angeles basin for a significant recent
  southern California earthquake.
• Ground Motion Maps are derivable from Pathway 1
  and Pathway 2 and from are available from
  observation for a selected few Southern
  California earthquakes.

14
CME Model Comparison
Example Use AR and AWM models to predict PGV for
Northridge

• Predictive PGV Map from Pathway 1 Attenuation
  Relation using SCEC CVM
• Predictive PGV Map from Pathway 2 Olsen AWM using
  SCEC CVM
• Observed PGV TriNet Shakemap.

15
CME Additional Comparisons
Other predictive datasets will be produced such
as seismograms although these may not be
available from both pathways.

• Seismograms from Pathway 2 Olsen AWM using SCEC
  VM
• Seismograms from Pathway 2 Olsen AWM using
  Harvard VM
• Seismograms from Pathway 2 Day AWM using SCEC
  CVM.
• Seismograms from TriNet/SCECDC using observations.