Title: PRSS Technology Forum 2002
1PRSS Technology Forum - 2002
2PRSS Technology Forum
16-17th September 2002, Kuantan
BAYAN 3-D Modeling by Mohd Ismail Omar
3Objective of Presentation
- Present Forum Participants with the Bayan 3-D
modeling Workflow and Benefits
4Presentation Outline
- Team Structure
- Geological Setting
- Data Preparation Workflow
- Property 3D (Geostatistics) Simulation
- S2.2/S2.6 Example (static modeling)
- S3.4/S3.8 Example (static modeling)
- S4.5 Example (including reservoir simulation)
- Benefits
5Project Team Structure
6Stratigraphic Summary
7Paleoenvironment Map
- Sarawak Basin (Ref Shell, 1986b)
8Geographical Setting
Eurasian Plate
The Geographical Setting of SE Asia During the
Miocene (Hall, 1995)
Pacific Plate
Strike-Slip Movement Along Fault
Indian Plate
Sarawak Basin
Borneo with NW-SE Coastline
9Bayan Location Map
10Bayan Geological Model
11Data Preparation Process Flow
12Well Markers Correlation - Geology
Depth TVD
Cycle II Correlation Panel West Bayan (SW-NE)
13Well Markers Correlation - Seismic
Seismic Density Display illustrating Reverse
Faults
14Well Markers Correlation - Seismic
Seismic Density Display illustrating Coal Markers
15Bayan Structural Framework
16Sedimentology Facies
Bayan 107 ( 5615.4 5627.4 ft)
(Conglomorate)
17Sedimentology Facies
Bayan 2 (Bayan-3) - 5027.0 5047.1 ft
(Massive Sandstone)
18Sedimentology Facies
Bayan 8 (4847.8 4862.4ft)
(Muddy Sandstone)
19Sedimentology Facies
Bayan 8 4653.1 4668.3 ft
(Mudstone Sandy Mudstone)
20Sedimentology Facies
Bayan 5 (4147.0 4163.0 ft)
Coal between 4147.0 4151.5ft
(Coal)
21Identify Litho-Facies from Well Logs
Litho-facies input
Litho-facies output
22Facies Nomenclature (Rock Cell Core)
23Facies Comparison with Core
S7 Unit Bayan 8
24Facies Comparison with Core
S6 Unit Bayan 8
25Facies Comparison with Core
S5 Units Bayan 2
26Energy Classification
B) Medium Energy Facies
S4 Neutron/Density Cross-Plots of the Sandstone
Facies
27Well Log Statistics
West Bayan S4 Porosity Distribution By Facies
28Facies Analogue
29Property 3D Fluvial Simulation
30Control Parameters for Fluvial Simulation
- Litho-Facies at Well Bore
- Channel Statistics
- width/thickness ratios, wavelength, amplitude
- Global Proportion Curves
- Vertical Proportion Curves
- Areal property maps (seismic attributes) soft
control
31S2.2/S2.6 Example
32S2 Vertical Proportion Curves
33S2 - Effective Porosity Histograms
34S2 Layer 15 Realisation 8
35S2 Layer 40 Realisation 8
36S2 Lithology Section I 105 Realistion 8
B
A
37S3.4/S3.8 Example
38S3.4/S3.8 Vertical Proportion Curves
39S3 Attribute Input
S3 Unit Integrated Reflection Strength Seismic
Amplitude Map
S3 Unit Net Reservoir Porosity Mapped
Using Collocated Cokriging
40S3.4/S3.8 Effective Porosity Histograms
41S3.4/S3.8 Layer 15 Realisation 5
Porosity
Lithology
42S3.4/S3.8 Layer 55 Realisation 5
Porosity
Lithology
A
B
43S3.4/S3.8 Lithology Cross Section I 80 Realistion
5
B
A
44S4.5 Example
45S4.5 Vertical Proportion Curves
46S4.5 Attribute Input
S4 Unit Integrated Seismic Amplitude Map
S4 Unit Net Reservoir Porosity Mapped
Using Collocated Cokriging
47S4.5 Effective Porosity Histograms
Medium Energy Facies
48S4.5 Layer 25 Realisation 10
Lithology
Porosity
49S4.5 Layer 60 Realisation 10
Porosity
Lithology
A
B
50S4.5 Lithology Cross Section I 90 Realistion 10
B
A
51Geological to Reservoir Simulation Scale
- 1,420,000 to 142,000 cells
52Engineering Data Integration
53Simulation Model Construction
54Simulation Model Construction
55Typical Well Performance
56Model Prediction
57Model Prediction
Bypassed Oil
Bypassed Oil
Bypassed Oil
58Benefits
- A robust 3D geostatistical model which
categorises uncertainty in modelling the channel
in coastal plain environment . - Infill wells identified in S4.5 reservoir
generate some 6 MMstb of oil.
59