Captain Kevin S. Cook - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Captain Kevin S. Cook

Description:

The Aftermath of the LIMBURG. ADEN CONTAINER TERMINAL (ACT) THROUGHPUT 1999 - 2003 ... Aligns with SOLAS and ISPS Code. Some terminology is different ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:112
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: her108
Learn more at: http://www.oas.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Captain Kevin S. Cook


1
International Port Security
  • Captain Kevin S. Cook
  • Chief, Marine Safety Division
  • U.S. Coast Guard
  • Atlantic AreaPortsmouth, Virginia

2
Security Is Integral To A Ports Competitive
Position
3
LIMBURG impact on Yemen
4
The Aftermath of the LIMBURG
ADEN CONTAINER TERMINAL (ACT) THROUGHPUT 1999 -
2003
5
U.S. Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA)
  • Developed concurrently with ISPS Code
  • Aligns with SOLAS and ISPS Code
  • Some terminology is different
  • Applicability to non-U.S. flag vessels?
  • 33 CFR 104.105(c) clearly indicates that valid
    ISSC will attest to ships compliance with SOLAS
    and ISPS Code.

6
Security Levels
Level three Incident Imminent Exceptional
protective security measures, lasting for the
period of time when there is probable or imminent
risk of a security incident.
Level two Heightened Risk Enhanced protective
security measures, applying for the period of
time when there is a heightened risk of a
security incident.
Level one Normal Minimum appropriate
protective security measures must be maintained
at all times
MARSEC Level ? Security Level
7
Port Facility Boundaries (USCG)
  • Extends from ship/port interface to inner-most
    security perimeter
  • Passenger ships
  • Where stored, handled, processed
  • Explosives
  • Dangerous cargos
  • LNG
  • Liquefied hazardous gas
  • Oil
  • Hazardous materials in bulk

8
MTSA The International Port Security Program
9
International Port Security Program
  • Protect global shipping industry by sharing and
    aligning maritime security practices.
  • Implemented Summer of 2004
  • Traveling team to visit 45 countries per year
  • Liaison Officers stationed around the world to
    share information on best practices

10
International Port Security Program
  • Interpretations of ISPS Code
  • Exchange best practices
  • Improve communication
  • Understand approach to maritime security

11
Areas of Interest During Visits
  • Organization of Port Facility
  • Measures in Place
  • Ship/Port Interface Operations
  • Training/Exercises

12
OAS Countries Visited
  • Brazil
  • Panama
  • Guatemala
  • Honduras
  • Bahamas
  • Colombia
  • Mexico
  • Venezuela
  • Ecuador
  • Dominican Republic
  • Chile
  • Costa Rica
  • Jamaica
  • Trinidad Tobago
  • Peru
  • Argentina
  • Netherlands Antilles

13
Reciprocal Visits to the USA
  • As of December 1, 2005
  • European Commission (Italy, Netherlands, U.K.,
    Belgium, France)
  • Russia
  • Norway
  • Korea
  • Canada (ongoing exchanges)
  • Preparations for future visit
  • Argentina
  • Costa Rica

14
USCG ISPS Website
  • Sharing of Best Practices
  • www.uscg.mil/hq/g-m/mp/xfaqs.html

15
Best Practices
16
Best PracticesMore Examples
  • 3 stage plan for ISPS implementation,
    distributing costs over 3 year period.
  • Integration of five agencies into one new agency
    with exclusive authority over ISPS implementation
  • Entirely new port security training center
  • Frequent moves of security personnel to reduce
    corruption
  • Portable guard posts to randomly cover different
    port areas

17
Advantages of Implementation, Compliance
  • Reduce Terrorist Threat
  • Maintain Competitive Position
  • Expedite Trade with the U.S.
  • Improve Efficiency
  • Reduce Theft

18
Summary
  • Effective Port and Maritime Security needs to
    be an integrated aspect of port management for a
    port to be competitive and to entice shippers
    looking for reliable transport of goods to the
    United States.

19
  • QUESTIONS?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com