Title: Spatial distribution of trends in heat content
1Spatial distribution of trends in heat content
1982-2006 mean minus 1959-1981 mean
SST (deg C)
Taux (x 0.01N/m2)
Tauy (x 0.01N/m2)
T300 (deg C)
How reliable are the trends in ERA40 winds?
2Comparison with ocean observations
IPCC-AR4 (LEVITUS)
ORA-S3
CI0.05 deg/decade
- Similarities
- Equatorial cooling
- Warmer subtropics
- Cooling at 60N
- Comments
- Trends in ERA40 winds seem robust
- Stronger features in ORA-S3, more structure
- Circulation changes as well as mixed layer changes
3Trends in the Pacific Ocean
- Cooling of the Equatorial ocean is a robust
feature, captured by both sub-surface
observations and ocean model forced by
ERA40-winds - Shallower and wider equatorial meridional cell
- Warming in the Subtropical Pacific is robust
- Cooling in the North Pacific
Needs for decadal predictions
- What signals/modes are predictable at decadal
time scales? - Which observations are needed for decadal
prediction?
4ENSO and changing climate
- How to provide robust assessment and routine
monitoring of changes? - Need for improved ocean and atmospheric
reanalyses - Should/can we do attribution of the observed
changes? - Start validating the AR4 predictions?
- Is there a climate shift in 76/77? Or part of a
continuous process? - What are the implications of the observed changes
for ENSO and ENSO teleconnections? - Apply the BJ index to existing reanalysis for the
past and recent period?
5Status of ENSO forecasting
- Progress in forecasting SST is steady
- Improved forcing fluxes yield better forecast
skill - All the components of the ocean observing system
have a positive impact on the forecast skill. - Model error/initialization shock is a serious
problem in the Eastern Pacific. - Low amplitude in the intraseasonal time scales
can degrade the prediction of the interannual
variability - The response of the atmosphere to the SST forcing
is deficient and limits the seasonal forecast
skill
6How to improve further?
- More sophisticated assimilation methods are
needed for a seamless prediction system - A balanced initialization does not mean using
less information about the real world, but
adequate mapping between the observed state and
the model state. - The term coupled intialization is too vague.
Need to qualify different coupled
initialization strategies. - Need for a workshop on Coupled Model
INITIALIZATION? - Better Coupled models are needed to improve the
Seasonal Forecasts of T2m and precipitation. - Improved atmospheric and ocean reanalyses are
needed - Model improvement
- Initialization
- Calibration of model output for reliable seasonal
forecasts
7Progress in ENSO forecast skill
Rms error of forecasts has been systematically
reduced (solid lines) .
8Contribution of model improvement versus initial
conditions
S2 S2ic_S3model S3
Improvements in the coupled model (green versus
blue) are comparable to improvements in the
initial conditions (blue versus purple)
9Perceived Paradigm for initialization of coupled
forecasts
Real world
Model attractor
Medium range Being close to the real world is
perceived as advantageous. Model retains
information for these time scales. Model
attractor and real world are close?
Decadal or longer Need to initialize the model
attractor on the relevant time and spatial
scales. Model attractor different from real
world.
Seasonal? Somewhere in the middle?
At first sight, this paradigm would not allow a
seamless prediction system.
- Experiments
- Uncoupled SST Wind Stress Ocean Observations
(ASSIM) - Uncoupled SST Wind Stress (WIND)
- Coupled SST (COUP)
10Impact of external real world information
ASSIM WIND COUP
- Need better (more balanced) initialization
- More information corrects for model error, and
the information is retained during the fc. - Model errors that can not be corrected by
initialization (intraseasonal variability)
- Relation between drift and Amplitude of
Interannual variability. - Possible non linearity is the warm drift
interacting with the amplitude of ENSO? - Other source of errors even with the correct
mean state the I.V amplitude is small. MJO?
11Impact of real world information on skill
NINO3.4 RMS ERROR ASSIM WIND COUP
The additional information about the real world
improves the forecast skill, execept in the
Equatorial Atlantic
However optimal use of the observations may
require more sophisticated assimilation
techniques, able to map the observation space
into the model space
12Impact of Observing system on Seasonal Forecast
skill
- Moorings only the effect of anomalies is
measured, since the effect of the mean state is
included indirectly in the altimeter
assimilation. - Observing systems are complementary
- Altimeter has larger effect on Atlantic and
Eastern Pacific - Argo has larger effect on Indian Ocean and
Western Pacific
13Statistics for the period 1993-2007
- Impact of data assimilation depends on the
region - Central/Eastern Pacific assimilating data
improves the seasonal forecast skill, by
correcting the mean state and anomalies (NINO4) - In the Eastern Pacific (NINO1/2, NINO3) the
impact of better initialization of the anomalies
is hampered by degradation of the mean state. The
assimilation of data results in warmer bias (not
shown), which is detrimental for ENSO prediction
14Summary of ENSO prediction
- Most common ocean initialization strategy is the
uncoupled initialization - Ocean observations are assimilated into an ocean
model forced by atmospheric fluxes. - In general, this strategy improves the forecast
skill in the prediction of SST (if the coupled
model is good/discerning enough). - If there are serious model errors this strategy
can lead to large initialization shocks and
degradation of the skill (Equatorial Atlantic). - The skill of seasonal forecasts of SST is
steadily improving due to - Improved quality of coupled models
- Improved quality of atmospheric reanalysis
- Improved ocean observing system (contribution of
ARGO and Altimeter add to the moorings) - Improved ocean assimilation systems.
- More sophisticated assimilation methods are
needed for a seamless prediction system - A balanced initialization does not mean using
less information about the real world, but
adequate mapping between the observed state and
the model state.