The Nature of - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

The Nature of

Description:

What does being risk averse mean? ... which case, the insurer may discontinue marketing the product, since the market has shrunk. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:37
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: CJo
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Nature of


1
Chapter 3
  • The Nature of
  • Health Insurance Markets

2
A. Why Are There Markets for Insurance?
  • 1. Why is there a demand for insurance?
  • Consumers are willing to purchase insurance
    because they are risk
  • averse.
  • What does being risk averse mean?
  • The disutility of an expected loss associated
    with an uncertain (and
  • probably unlikely) adverse outcome is greater
    than the disutility of
  • a certain small loss (the cost of the insurance)
    entails. Risk aversion
  • is an equal but certain small lost (the cost of
    the insurance).

3
A. Why Are There Markets for Insurance?
  • EU expected utility
  • The weighted average of the utilities associated
    with possible outcomes, where the weight is the
    probability that a given outcome will occur.
  • Risk aversion can be illustrated
    diagrammatically In the following
  • figure, EU is the expected utility of an
    uncertain outcome. U is the
  • utility associated with a certain outcome. Here,
    a person with
  • wealth 15,000 pays 200 for insurance. Her
    certain (net) income
  • will be 14,800. Since this provides greater
    utility than a 10
  • chance of incurring a 1000 medical bill, which
    leaves her with an
  • expected income of 14,900, she is risk averse.

4
A. Why Are There Markets for Insurance?
  • Figure 3.1 Risk Aversion Illustrated

5
A. Why Are There Markets for Insurance?
  • 2. Why is there a supply of insurance?
  • Insurance companies Insurance companies estimate
    what their
  • average payouts will be. If they can charge more
    than the average
  • payout to cover costs, they can make profits.
  • Consumers Risk averse consumers are willing to
    pay more than
  • the expected value of their losses for insurance.
    The amount the
  • consumer is willing to pay over the actuarial
    fair value of the policy
  • is called the load or loading fee. This is the
    price of transferring risk
  • to the insurance company.

6
A. Why Are There Markets for Insurance?
  • The load (L) is often expressed as a ratio
    between the price of
  • insurance, the premium, and the expected payout
    (E)
  • L 100 x (Premium / E 1)
  • In the equation (above) the marginal utility of
    wealth is decreasing
  • as wealth increases. When that is true, the
    slope of the EU curve
  • decreases as wealth increases.
  • In that situation, an individual will be willing
    to take an unfair bet,
  • e.g. pay more for insurance than the expected
    value of the loss
  • against which he is insuring himself.

7
B. Insurance and Consumer Behavior
  • Moral Hazard
  • If being insured affects behavior in such a way
    that the expected
  • payout from the insurance company is increased,
    this is called
  • moral hazard.
  • Health insurance is unlike most other forms of
    insurance
  • Reduces the cost of the expenditure (medical
    care) associated with adverse outcome, e.g.
    illness.
  • Main form of moral hazard associated with having
    health insurance is increased use of medical care
    by an individual or family.
  • With other types of insurance, moral hazard is
    usually associated with behavior that affects the
    likelihood of the adverse outcome.

8
B. Insurance and Consumer Behavior
  • If the demand for medical care is the usual
    downward sloping
  • function, and if health insurance reduces the
    price of medical care,
  • being insured would tend to lead to the use of
    more medical care,
  • everything else being held constant.
  • If an insurance policy is structured so that the
    insured pays only the
  • premium, after which medical care is free, demand
    is represented
  • by D2D in Fig. 3.2.
  • If the insurance company pays half the bill and
    the insured pays the
  • other half (e.g. has a 50 co-payment), then the
    demand curve
  • shifts to D1D. Without insurance the demand is
    shown by D0D.

9
B. Insurance and Consumer Behavior
  • Figure 3.2 Effects of Insurance on Consumption
    of Medical Care

10
B. Insurance and Consumer Behavior
  • Offsetting Moral Hazard
  • Insurance companies structure insurance policies
    so as to offset
  • moral hazard. The usual ways are
  • Deductibles
  • Co-payments
  • Life-time limits on payouts
  • Reimbursing in accordance with usual or
    customary fees

11
B. Insurance and Consumer Behavior
  • Adverse Selection
  • Adverse selection exists when people who are more
    likely to buy
  • insurance or policies with more extensive
    coverage are also more
  • likely to use more insured medical services.
  • Adverse selection in an insurance pool will
  • Drive up the price of insurance premiums, causing
    those who expect to purchase fewer insured
    services (the younger and healthier) to drop out
    of the pool.
  • May lead to a Death Spiral - the pool of
    insured will become smaller and smaller, with
    only the high risk members of the pool remaining,
    in which case, the insurer may discontinue
    marketing the product, since the market has
    shrunk.

12
B. Insurance and Consumer Behavior
  • Offsetting Adverse Selection
  • If insurance companies can distinguish
    individuals who are higher
  • and lower risk and can set prices in accordance
    with this, adverse
  • selection can be offset.
  • One technique is to price using experience
    rating pricing
  • premiums on the basis of past payouts.
  • Another related technique is to demand medical
    records, and
  • to price in accordance with apparent health
    status, in some
  • cases providing insurance that excludes coverage
    of pre-existing
  • conditions.

13
C. Group Health Insurance
  • In the United States, most private insurance is
    employment-based
  • group health insurance. It has historically been
    very popular with
  • workers and employers.
  • (1) Group health insurance partially offsets the
    problem of adverse
  • selection. Within groups there is community
    rating, e.g. no price
  • discrimination based on medical histories or
    personal characteristics
  • of individual members of the group.
  • (2) All employment-based group health insurance
    receives favorable
  • tax treatment employees are not taxed on the
    value of the
  • insurance policy, and employers can deduct the
    cost of their
  • contribution to employee insurance premiums as
    part of the cost of
  • production.
  • (3) Except for very small groups, or those known
    to be
  • characterized by adverse selection, group health
    insurance
  • premiums are much lower than are premiums on
    insurance
  • purchased by individual families.

14
C. Group Health Insurance
  • There are some disadvantages to a system of
    employment-based
  • health insurance.
  • (1) It tends to tie people to their jobs (job
    lock) and therefore
  • reduces labor mobility.
  • (2) Small firms often cannot afford to provide
    workers with
  • insurance, so the employment-based system, when
    not mandatory,
  • leaves many workers without access to affordable
    insurance.
  • (3) The unemployed face the double insecurity of
    loss of wages and
  • loss of health insurance.
  • (4) Employers are cutting back on their
    contribution to employee
  • health insurance, with the result that many
    workers now do not have
  • insurance because they drop out of the firms
    plan when they have
  • to pay an increasingly large part of the premium.

15
D. Community Effects of Health Insurance
  • Over time, at least until the last decade, U.S.
    workers have opted
  • for more comprehensive health insurance coverage,
    usually
  • largely paid for up front by employers. The
    favorable tax
  • treatment of employment-based group insurance has
    augmented
  • this demand for health insurance. (In the 1950s,
    most people had,
  • at most, insurance covering hospitalization).
  • Some economists believe that this has led to
    negative aggregate
  • welfare effects. (Martin Feldstein is an example
    of this point
  • of view). They argue that too much insurance is
    inefficient and
  • leads to consumption of medical care to the
    point where the
  • marginal benefit, certainly the marginal social
    benefit, is less than
  • the marginal social cost. The good effects of
    insurance coverage
  • are partly offset by the increase in the price of
    health care that
  • results from the increased demand of the
    community.

16
D. Community Effects of Health Insurance
  • Figure 3.3 Communitys Insurance Coverage and
    Demand for Health Care

17
D. Community Effects of Health Insurance
  • An alternative view of the welfare effects of
    group health insurance
  • has emerged (John Nyman)
  • (1) The negative welfare effects of excess
    health insurance are
  • based on an analysis that focuses on the negative
    moral hazard
  • effects resulting from lower prices of medical
    care for individuals.
  • (2) If one considers the income transfer from
    healthy to sick
  • individuals within an insurance pool, there are
    offsetting positive
  • welfare effects when people are able to purchase
    more medical
  • care as a result of the implicit income transfer.
  • (3) Group health insurance has also increased
    access to insurance
  • for people who otherwise would have found it too
    expensive to
  • purchase in the individual market.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com