Title: Internet Routing Instability
1Internet Routing Instability
- OFFENSE
- Scott Crosby Atul Singh
2Critique
- Poor title
- Level of contribution
- Clarity of presentation
- Correctness
- Methodology
- Claims
- Relevance
3Poor Title
- Not about stability
- But, its about routing traffic
- Doesnt tell desirable updates from undesirable
updates - Better title Characterization of BGP routing
traffic
4Route updates
Change state
Change nothing
Desirable and Necessary
Undesirable
Topology
Policy
5Contribution
- Measurement results must be clear for this to be
a contribution - Most paths are stable
- Already known from Paxon96
- Free debugging
- bad implementations
- vendor screw ups
6Clarity
- Figure 2
- Only shows 10 of the picture Where is WWDup?
- Appears uncorrected for missing data
- Useless to estimate true distribution
- Cant eyeball ratio of different categories
7(No Transcript)
8Clarity
- Figure 3
- Impressive graph with 30,000 sample points
- Unreadable, unnecessary
- Only discusses trends should graph trends.
9Fig 3 Internet forwarding instability density
measure at Mae-east Exchange point during 1996.
10Correctness
- '99 of routing messages are pathological'?
- No data to backup their claim
- Analysis of routing messages
- Wheres the table of the number of each type?
- Wheres the table estimating the number of
unnecessary routing messages?
11Methodology
- Only 5 sites, why is that enough?
- Discount private exchanges
- Do the instabilities actually effect performance?
- Claim yes, but no evidence
- Ugliness is not a crime
- Uses prefix-pair tuple
- How to deal with aggregation?
12Claims
- routing instability contributes to poor
end-to-end performance? - Paxon96 paper shows 1 problems
- high levels of instability can lead to packet
loss - Paxon96 shows this is rare
- Unverified
13Relevance
- Does instability matter?
- If the network changes, it changes
- A network with static routes would be perfectly
stable - But not robust
- Debug vendor Xs code
- Obsolescent
- new routers contain a full forwarding table in
RAM - Care about end-to-end performance
14Its a dirty job to critique but someone had to
do it
- Poor title
- Level of contribution
- Clarity of presentation
- Correctness
- Methodology
- Claims
- Relevance