Internet Routing Instability

About This Presentation
Title:

Internet Routing Instability

Description:

Doesn't tell desirable updates from undesirable updates ... Undesirable. Contribution. Measurement results must be clear for this to be a contribution ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: atu1
Learn more at: https://www.cs.rice.edu

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Internet Routing Instability


1
Internet Routing Instability
  • OFFENSE
  • Scott Crosby Atul Singh

2
Critique
  • Poor title
  • Level of contribution
  • Clarity of presentation
  • Correctness
  • Methodology
  • Claims
  • Relevance

3
Poor Title
  • Not about stability
  • But, its about routing traffic
  • Doesnt tell desirable updates from undesirable
    updates
  • Better title Characterization of BGP routing
    traffic

4
Route updates
Change state
Change nothing
Desirable and Necessary
Undesirable
Topology
Policy
5
Contribution
  • Measurement results must be clear for this to be
    a contribution
  • Most paths are stable
  • Already known from Paxon96
  • Free debugging
  • bad implementations
  • vendor screw ups

6
Clarity
  • Figure 2
  • Only shows 10 of the picture Where is WWDup?
  • Appears uncorrected for missing data
  • Useless to estimate true distribution
  • Cant eyeball ratio of different categories

7
(No Transcript)
8
Clarity
  • Figure 3
  • Impressive graph with 30,000 sample points
  • Unreadable, unnecessary
  • Only discusses trends should graph trends.

9
Fig 3 Internet forwarding instability density
measure at Mae-east Exchange point during 1996.
10
Correctness
  • '99 of routing messages are pathological'?
  • No data to backup their claim
  • Analysis of routing messages
  • Wheres the table of the number of each type?
  • Wheres the table estimating the number of
    unnecessary routing messages?

11
Methodology
  • Only 5 sites, why is that enough?
  • Discount private exchanges
  • Do the instabilities actually effect performance?
  • Claim yes, but no evidence
  • Ugliness is not a crime
  • Uses prefix-pair tuple
  • How to deal with aggregation?

12
Claims
  • routing instability contributes to poor
    end-to-end performance?
  • Paxon96 paper shows 1 problems
  • high levels of instability can lead to packet
    loss
  • Paxon96 shows this is rare
  • Unverified

13
Relevance
  • Does instability matter?
  • If the network changes, it changes
  • A network with static routes would be perfectly
    stable
  • But not robust
  • Debug vendor Xs code
  • Obsolescent
  • new routers contain a full forwarding table in
    RAM
  • Care about end-to-end performance

14
Its a dirty job to critique but someone had to
do it
  • Poor title
  • Level of contribution
  • Clarity of presentation
  • Correctness
  • Methodology
  • Claims
  • Relevance
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)