Alternative Format Lending: A Roadmap to Utopia - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Alternative Format Lending: A Roadmap to Utopia

Description:

http://www.gov.on.ca/citizenship/accessibility/english/act2001.htm. Undue hardship, solvency' ... Familiar, low tech 4-track player (-) Labour intensive, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: temp236
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Alternative Format Lending: A Roadmap to Utopia


1
Alternative Format Lending A Roadmap to Utopia
  • Trent Copp, B.A.
  • Library Assistant, Special Needs

2
The Plan
  • Print disabilities
  • Alternative formats
  • Existing inventories
  • The Resource Service Library
  • Utopia (and how to get there)

3
Dyslexia
  • Is not
  • Stupidity, laziness
  • ESL
  • It is
  • Invisible
  • Lifelong
  • Neurologically based
  • Variable severity

4
Subtypes of Dyslexia
  • Visual processing deficits
  • Visual figure-ground deficit
  • Visual sequencing deficit
  • Visual discrimination deficit
  • Visual depth perception deficit

5
Visual Impairments
  • Severity
  • From low vision to no vision
  • Different ages of acquisition
  • Causes
  • Diabetic retinopathy
  • AMD
  • Cataracts

6
Notes on Disability Services
  • PC people first
  • Confidentiality
  • Ontarians with Disabilities Act
  • http//www.gov.on.ca/citizenship/accessibility/eng
    lish/act2001.htm
  • Undue hardship, solvency
  • Normalization
  • A students experience

7
Alternative Formats
  • Audio
  • () Familiar, low tech 4-track player
  • (-) Labour intensive, variable quality,
    navigation
  • Braille
  • () Math, Stats, Graphics
  • (-) Cost and labour intensive,
  • (-) Limited market, cumbersome
  • Large Print
  • () Cost and labour effective
  • (-) Limited market, cumbersome

8
Electronic Text
  • Word processor format
  • PDFs
  • Screenreaders/magnifiers
  • Kurzweil, JAWS ()
  • Free alternatives

9
Resources
  • Recordings for the Blind Dyslexic
    http//www.rfbd.org/
  • Limitations for Canadians
  • Institutional production
  • inefficient
  • Student self-production
  • Student priorities

10
Resource Service Library
  • Co-ordinate vast interlending
  • AMICUS, LOUIS, CNIB, etc.
  • Contract production of transcription

11
However
  • Cost
  • Time for new transcriptions
  • Administrative bottlenecks

12
Trent _at_ Mac
  • The process of obtaining alternative formats
  • Referral from CSD
  • Assessing students preferences
  • Contacting prof
  • Searching catalogues
  • Ordering, receiving, etc.
  • New transcriptions
  • The problem of elapsed time

13
The Publisher Option
  • Direct contact with requests
  • Major publishers online forms
  • http//www.thomsonrights.com/permissions/action/st
    ep1?
  • http//www.pearsoned.com/legal/form.htm
  • Smaller publishers
  • Advocacy
  • The McMaster etext contract

14
The Joys of Etext
  • Cost effective
  • Labour effective
  • One-size-fits-all (almost!)
  • New editions

15
Public Domain
  • Legalities
  • Simplicity
  • http//www.gutenberg.org/index/by-title.html
  • http//ota.ahds.ac.uk/

16
Ease of Access
  • Direct access cuts involvement
  • Administrative layers
  • Volunteers
  • New production
  • Storage space
  • Ends lending
  • English language electronic database

17
Reality Check
  • Screenreader limitations math, diagrams
  • Technological intimidation
  • Publishers limitations
  • Ignorance
  • Quality of production
  • Etext inventory
  • Inefficiency

18
Technological Potential
  • Advancing technology
  • Adobe 6.0
  • New screenreader versions
  • Future potential
  • Equations, diagrams
  • Computer voice
  • Navigation

19
Roadmap to Utopia
  • Educating smaller publishers
  • Awareness of software companies
  • Benefits of promoting screenreaders
  • Legislative push?
  • Faculty pressure?

20
A word from the publishers
  • Hi Trent-
  •  
  • Here are the answers
  •  
  • 1) Thus far concerns are minimal to nil. There
    have been no instances, that I'm aware of, of
    unlawful use or copying of e-texts.
  •  
  • 2) I'd say we have a 65-75 ability to provide
    e-texts to requestors. I expect that percentage
    to go up as requestors ask for more recently
    published texts.
  •  
  • 3) I'd say the university just needs to provide
    all information possible about the book
    requested.
  •  
  • 4) No common problems at this point that I've
    come across.
  •  
  • Hope this helps,
  • Keith Uhlich
  • OUP

21
Contact Info
  • Trent Copp
  • Email spneeds_at_mcmaster.ca
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com