Title: Satellitebased Internet
1Satellite-based Internet
Wireless Communication Systems Aitor Ferández
2Main features
- Appropiate mobility support
- Global coverage
- Inherent broadcast capacity
- Bandwith on demand capacity
3Appliable to
- Globally scattered users
- Aeronautical and maritime users
- Remote, infraestructure lacking areas
- Point to multipoint communications
- Multipoint to multipoint comm.
4Offered services
- Broadband access networks
- High speed backbone networks
- Connecting heterogeneous networks
- Comm. links between users with mobile or
fixed terminals
5Satellite communication Fundamentals
- A satellite system consists of
Space segment
Ground segment
6Satellite communication Fundamentals
- Ground segment consists of
- Gateway stations (GS)
- Network control center (NCC)
- Operation control center (OCC)
7Satellite communication Fundamentals
- Space segment consists of
- Geostationary orbit (GSO)
- Nongeostationary orbit (NGSO)
- Medium earth orbit (MEO)
- Low earth orbit (LEO)
8Satellite communication Fundamentals
- 35786 Km avobe the equator - Appears fixed to
an observer on the Earth - Sufficient for global
coverage - 1 GSO Satellite covers one third of
Earth surface - This area is called
footprint
9Satellite communication Fundamentals
- High launching cost - Large antennas and
transmission power required - Biggest problem
Propagation delay - Around 250-280 ms
- Undesirable for real-time traffic
10Satellite communication Fundamentals
11Satellite communication Fundamentals
- Closer to the earth surface - Smaller antennas
and transmission power required - Footprint
is also smaller - Larger number of satellites is
necessary - Steerable antennas become useful
12Satellite communication Fundamentals
- From 3000 Km up to the GSO orbit - Typical
round-trip propagation delay 110-300 ms
- 200-3000 Km above earth surface - Typical
round-trip propagation delay 20-25 ms
13Satellite communication Fundamentals
14Satellite communication Fundamentals
- Responsible of the satellite communications -
Once launched, a satellite is impossible to
upgrade
- No on-board processing (OBP) on traditional sats
15Satellite communication Fundamentals
- Some satellites allow OBP (Conform ISL's) -
Demodulation/remodulation -
Decoding/recoding - Transponder/beam
switching - Routing - Connectivity in space
without terrestrial resource is possible
16Satellite communication Fundamentals
- Most commonly used are C, Ku, and Ka bands -
With higher frequency, and shorter wavelenght
- Smaller antenas can be used
17Satellite communication Fundamentals
18Satellite-basedInternet architectures
- Several implementation options due to diversity
- Suggestions to use hybrid GSO-NGSO network
- Sats can act as a backbone/Hi-speed network
- ARPANET became backbone of research network
19Satellite-basedInternet architectures
- The idea of using satellites in last mile is newer
- Satellites interact with GS's
- May be the only access method for remote areas
- Bent pipe architecture (Fig 1) suffers big latency
- Because of the lack of direct communication
20Satellite-basedInternet architectures
21Satellite-basedInternet architectures
- OBP and ISL's can be combined to create a network
in the sky. Both combination access and backbone
network. Teledisc or Iridium are examples of this
kind of network. - Flexibility at cost of more complex routing
22Satellite-basedInternet architectures
Architecture Design
23Satellite-basedInternet architectures
- DBS Model (Direct Broadcast Satellites)
- Acces internet directly by satellites. Only
download - Created because of internet traffic asimetry in
which the server transmits much more information
than in reverse - Upload from the client is made via terrestrial
GS's
24Satellite-basedInternet architectures
25Satellite-basedInternet architectures
26Satellite-basedInternet architectures
27Satellite-basedInternet architectures
- Spaceway architecture scheme
28Satellite-basedInternet architectures
- Teledisc satellite distribution
29Satellite-basedInternet architectures
- Teledisc satellite coverage
30Satellite-basedInternet architectures
- Iridium satellite distribution
31Satellite-basedInternet architectures
- Iridium satellite coverage
32Technical challenges
- Multiple Access Control (MAC)
- Is a set of rules - This rules decide how the
clients in the footprint of the satellite acces
its uplink channel, which is a limited resource -
Affects to the QoS and higher layers
33Technical challenges
- This is the most basic of MAC's
- It is based in frequency, time or code divixion
basis (FDMA, TDMA and CDMA respectively) - Very poor resource management. For small networks.
34Technical challenges
- Thanks to small and cheap terminals
- Less data usage, which turns in a bigger number
of terminals which a satellite can cover. - Each station transmit data regardless of the
others.
35Technical challenges
- Solves RA's lack of QoS providing
- Dynamically allocates system bandwidth depending
on how many clients request access - The transmission for permission becomes the
problem, but it is affordable.
36Technical challenges
- After reservation, bandwidth is segmented in FDMA
or TDMA - Centralized or Distributed control
- Resource reservation can be explicitly or
implicitly done. - Priority Oriented Demand Protocol and First In
First Out, combine explicit and implicit requests
37Routing Issues
- We will refer to LEO satellite systems, as
Iridium can be. - It is very attractive to be able to design a
network in the sky, thanks to OBP and ISL's - The routing becomes crucial.
38Routing Issues
- Satellites have very little visible period to us
- When a satellite goes out, and another comes in,
intersatellite handover happens - Each satellite is able to set up 4 to 8 ISL's
- These can be intraplane or interplane
39Routing Issues
- Discrete-time Dynamic Virtual Topology Routing
- DT-DVTR makes use of the periodic nature of sats
- Works completely offline
- System storages visibility data of each interval
- When topology changes, the best path is choosen
40Routing Issues
- Hidew the topologycal changes from the routing
protocols, despite satellites are actually moving - Keeps state information, such as routing tables
and user data - When the satellite covering the node disappears
in the horizon, the node is covered by the one
that comes
41Routing Issues
- IP routing is adopted, based in the VN concept
- Integrates the space network with terrestrial
Internet - Supports IP multicast and IP QoS
- Despite is useful and desirable, implementation
problems appear everywhere. Constantly improving.
42Routing Issues
- Many proposed systems use ATM as network protocol
for the constellation - A version of DT-DVTR based in ATM is
investigated, grouping the ingress and engress
satellites' virtual channel connections in a VPC - Possibly, IP over ATM will be implemented
43Routing Issues
- Internal design of communications will probably
change constantly to fit manufacturers or
clients. - Satellite network is isolated of terrestrial
network - AS (astronomous system) concept. SatAS.
- Only Border Gateways will communicate with these,
by BGP
44Routing Issues
- DBS is unidirectional. Traditional Routing is
invalid - Static routing instead of dynamic routing is an
option - Options
- Routing Protocol Modification
- Tunnelling
45Routing Issues
- Routing Protocol Modification
- In unidirectional routing, we can only send
(feeders) - The clients at the other side can only receive
(receivers) - Make a receiver identify the potential feeders,
ignoring unusable data while mantaining
neighboring connection - The receiver periodically delivers its own
routing message to all feeders through terrestial
link
46Routing Issues
- Offers a link layer approach to hide the
asymetry. - A tunnel is a virtual link set between a DBS and
a receiver by using encapsulation and
decapsulation - User encapsulates package -gt sends to routing
protocol via terrestrial nw -gt arrives to
satellite -gt the tunnel decapsulates the message
- gt forwards it to the routing protocol
47Satellite Transport
- TCP/IP and UDP/IP protocols are the heart of the
Internet. Their solidity and standarization makes
them adaptable and unlikely to be discarded - Satellite-based Internet will use UDP and TCP.
- TCP being connection oriented, will receive the
great impact of high latencys and error rates.
48Satellite Transport
- TCP/IP performance over satellite
- High latencies will affect TCP's functionality.
- Timeout based protocols such as this may severely
suffer large round-trip times delivered by
satellite connections - Also suffer from interferences, fading,
shadowing, and rain atteunation. This causes Bit
Error Rate (BER)
49Satellite Transport
- Performance enhacenments have been developed over
TCP - TCP selective acknowledgement (SACK)
- TCP for transaction (T/TCP)
- Persistent TCP Connection
- MTU mechanism
- FEC
50Satellite Transport
- TCP extensions solve some limitation of standard
TCP - TCP Spoofing
- TCP Splitting
- Web Caching
51THANK YOU!Aitor Fernández